Why is it that the GFDL output is not made available to the public for so many hours after it presumably comes out?
You know, the 00Z hurricane models show up on the various servers at around 8:30-8:50pm EDT. Why not the 00Z GFDL too? What's up with that. Been wondering that for a long time.
Question from me....
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- hurricanetrack
- HurricaneTrack.com

- Posts: 1781
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
- Location: Wilmington, NC
- Contact:
Question from me....
0 likes
-
gkrangers
Re: Question from me....
Maybe the GFDL takes longer to run, like the global models?hurricanetrack wrote:Why is it that the GFDL output is not made available to the public for so many hours after it presumably comes out?
You know, the 00Z hurricane models show up on the various servers at around 8:30-8:50pm EDT. Why not the 00Z GFDL too? What's up with that. Been wondering that for a long time.
The tropical models don't require much computing, so they run quick and are released just after their run time.
Just a guess.
0 likes
GFDL is computationally intensive relative to the BAMs and LBAR.
The other thing that may delay its release is the fact that it relies upon the GFS for initial and boundary conditions. If it uses true 00Z initial conditions (and not the 6 hr forecast from the 18Z GFS), then those aren't available until 0330Z. I don't know for sure if that is the case, however.
The other thing that may delay its release is the fact that it relies upon the GFS for initial and boundary conditions. If it uses true 00Z initial conditions (and not the 6 hr forecast from the 18Z GFS), then those aren't available until 0330Z. I don't know for sure if that is the case, however.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: wwizard and 130 guests

