92L Invest

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#141 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:53 am

elysium wrote:I will admit that this one had me going for a while. When you study the satellite imagery carefully, though, you realize that whoever listed this as a strong tropical wave has a very broad interpretation of the word 'strong'. This thing is in about the worst shape that it could be in and still be a wave, IMO.

This is a dud. It's better to realize it early. Even if it holds together (highly unlikely), this thing will never extract itself from the mountains of Hispaniola and Cuba. It's moving dead west. You can forget it.

I hate to be the one to break this to everyone here. 92L did look promising, but this one's over. This is when you kiss them goodbye and.....move on to the next one. It isn't so much that it's in poor condition, it's rather because it will never get a chance to develop. This one is making a bee line into the mountains, and there is nothing that can be done about that. 92L is a waste of time.


Here come the naysayers :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#142 Postby x-y-no » Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:56 am

elysium wrote:I will admit that this one had me going for a while. When you study the satellite imagery carefully, though, you realize that whoever listed this as a strong tropical wave has a very broad interpretation of the word 'strong'. This thing is in about the worst shape that it could be in and still be a wave, IMO.

This is a dud. It's better to realize it early. Even if it holds together (highly unlikely), this thing will never extract itself from the mountains of Hispaniola and Cuba. It's moving dead west. You can forget it.

I hate to be the one to break this to everyone here. 92L did look promising, but this one's over. This is when you kiss them goodbye and.....move on to the next one. It isn't so much that it's in poor condition, it's rather because it will never get a chance to develop. This one is making a bee line into the mountains, and there is nothing that can be done about that. 92L is a waste of time.


It's a "strong" wave not because of convection but because of the surface wind signature.

I do agree that it has been moving west, and neeeds to acquire a NNW motion quickly in order to avoid crossing directly over Hispaniola.

I can't agree that it's a dead issue yet, however.

Jan
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148500
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#143 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:00 am

x-y-no wrote:
elysium wrote:I will admit that this one had me going for a while. When you study the satellite imagery carefully, though, you realize that whoever listed this as a strong tropical wave has a very broad interpretation of the word 'strong'. This thing is in about the worst shape that it could be in and still be a wave, IMO.

This is a dud. It's better to realize it early. Even if it holds together (highly unlikely), this thing will never extract itself from the mountains of Hispaniola and Cuba. It's moving dead west. You can forget it.

I hate to be the one to break this to everyone here. 92L did look promising, but this one's over. This is when you kiss them goodbye and.....move on to the next one. It isn't so much that it's in poor condition, it's rather because it will never get a chance to develop. This one is making a bee line into the mountains, and there is nothing that can be done about that. 92L is a waste of time.


It's a "strong" wave not because of convection but because of the surface wind signature.

I do agree that it has been moving west, and neeeds to acquire a NNW motion quickly in order to avoid crossing directly over Hispaniola.

I can't agree that it's a dead issue yet, however.

Jan


Jan I think looking at it it well may cross Puerto Rico first or pass just south.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#144 Postby x-y-no » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:05 am

cycloneye wrote:
Jan I think looking at it it well may cross Puerto Rico first or pass just south.


Yes, certainly. But even though Puerto Rico has some mountainous territory, crossing there as a TD with a broad circulation isn't going to do the system a tremendous amount of damage. The spine a Hispaniola is different matter.

You're certainly in for a ton of rain, whatever happens.

Jan
0 likes   

elysium

#145 Postby elysium » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:12 am

No, not really a naysayer as such. I just think it's better to put 92L into the proper perspective instead of wasting time watching something that won't develop. Of course, there are some who find these type systems interesting from a meteorolical viewpoint, and that's fine. Just don't take time away from something else more important under the assumption that you will benefit in the long run by being fully prepared for a possible tropical event evolving out of 92L. This one's a dud not only in terms of organization, but also directional heading. It can be interesting from a meteorological perspective, however. It is interesting sometimes to watch one of these undeveloped systems run aground. Some people like to watch that type of thing, and to them, all I can say I suppose is by all means do watch. Even at this late stage of his career, Franklin stills attracts a few diehard fans. People do like to watch. There's certainly nothing wrong with that
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#146 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:17 am

the UL ahead of it is diving SW. Models cannot forecast upper winds over the ocean with any level of accuracy due to the lack of obs, and the poor weighting of satellite data (which must be higher for regions where there are no obs)

This one is probably not going to develop, and IMO, there is no reason at all to waste a recon flight on this system.

Entire basin is starting to become hostile, much more in line with climo for this type of year
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#147 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:21 am

I think 92L is far from dead and we ALL know things can change in an instant in the tropics.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#148 Postby x-y-no » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:25 am

Derek Ortt wrote:the UL ahead of it is diving SW. Models cannot forecast upper winds over the ocean with any level of accuracy due to the lack of obs, and the poor weighting of satellite data (which must be higher for regions where there are no obs)

This one is probably not going to develop, and IMO, there is no reason at all to waste a recon flight on this system.


You don't think there's any prospect of that ULL staying far enough ahead to ventilate it instead of tearing it apart?


Entire basin is starting to become hostile, much more in line with climo for this type of year


It does look that way.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#149 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:27 am

the UL already appears to be too close.

With this pattern, except for the tropical Atlantic, which has SAL issues, it is going to be extremely hard to get any type of cyclon for a few days or a couple of weeks. Seems to be shaping up somewhat like 2003 in that regard
0 likes   

ThunderMate
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 215
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:18 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#150 Postby ThunderMate » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:28 am

This system has plenty of life left and is looking like a southeast coast hit due to the ridge being blocked from rebuilding by the trough over the southeast. And if won't be a waste of a recon flight because every model is developing this system.
0 likes   

ThunderMate
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 215
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:18 am
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Contact:

#151 Postby ThunderMate » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:29 am

Derek where did you get your degree? how can no system develope for a couple of weeks THIS season?
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#152 Postby Frank2 » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:32 am

Re: Thunder44's post

Naysayers, no - commenting on what is there, yes.

Looking at this photo, does anyone see a "vigorous tropical wave"?

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/WATL/VIS/20.jpg

There appears to be scattered strong convection in several areas, but, nothing else.

Frank
Last edited by Frank2 on Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#153 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:33 am

but they aren't developing it until it reaches the Bahamas, and that is looking less likely as the UL is not moving out of the way and this may cross Hispaniola
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#154 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:34 am

University of Miami, got my degree in Meteorology and Applied mathematics

The pattern is not likely to change quickly, just as the favorable pattern from a couple of weeks ago didn't change. Plus, as has been stated in the analysis forum, we are on the less favorable phase of the MJO right now
0 likes   

elysium

#155 Postby elysium » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:36 am

Not this one stormcenter. This one's pretty washed-out. There will be better systems to track a little later on in the season. I think that the fast pace so far this season has just about everyone thinking that every single system will develop (lol). 92L is good as gone, but didn't it have you going? It had me going for a while there. I've seen livelier floating pieces of logs that accidently became oceanic post septic. That's what 92L reminds me mostly of (lol). Logs.
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6400
Age: 61
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

#156 Postby boca » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:37 am

Derek do you think 92L will cross Fl and give us rain atleast?
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#157 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:42 am

Frank2 wrote:Re: Thunder44's post

Naysayers, no - commenting on what is there, yes.

Looking at this photo, does anyone see a "vigorous tropical wave"?

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/WATL/VIS/20.jpg

There appears to be scattered strong convection in several areas, but, nothing else.

Frank


A wave is defined by it's surface wind signature not by convection. There are waves moving through the Atlantic that often don't have much convection and is scattered at best. This morning convection is deep and concentrated in a small area with a low pressure. I know it doesn't look "perfect" on satellite, but many developing TD's don't look very well at all. You can't judge just by satellite, you have to use surface obs as well, if they are any avaible in the area. And it too early to know where exactly this is going and to write it off.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#158 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:47 am

elysium wrote:Not this one stormcenter. This one's pretty washed-out. There will be better systems to track a little later on in the season. I think that the fast pace so far this season has just about everyone thinking that every single system will develop (lol). 92L is good as gone, but didn't it have you going? It had me going for a while there. I've seen livelier floating pieces of logs that accidently became oceanic post septic. That's what 92L reminds me mostly of (lol). Logs.


I would have to go with JB 's thinking this morning on 92L especially considering how this seasons been going so far. But hey anything is possible and it may just go POOF. :lol:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#159 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:48 am

the weaker the system remains, the farther west it will come
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#160 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:48 am

Thunder44 wrote:
Frank2 wrote:Re: Thunder44's post

Naysayers, no - commenting on what is there, yes.

Looking at this photo, does anyone see a "vigorous tropical wave"?

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/WATL/VIS/20.jpg

There appears to be scattered strong convection in several areas, but, nothing else.

Frank


A wave is defined by it's surface wind signature not by convection. There are waves moving through the Atlantic that often don't have much convection and is scattered at best. This morning convection is deep and concentrated in a small area with a low pressure. I know it doesn't look "perfect" on satellite, but many developing TD's don't look very well at all. You can't judge just by satellite, you have to use surface obs as well, if they are any avaible in the area. And it too early to know where exactly this is going and to write it off.


Good points.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests