MIA NWS

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
pavelbure224
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 132
Age: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Sunrise Fl

MIA NWS

#1 Postby pavelbure224 » Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:56 am

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL
230 PM EDT THU JUL 28 2005

.DISCUSSION...THE UPPER LOW NEAR 70W YESTERDAY HAS MOVED WEST
OVERNIGHT AND IS OVER THE EASTERN BAHAMAS TODAY. THE UPPER RIDGE TO
ITS NORTH HAS BUILT SOME SO WOULD EXPECT IT TO MOVE ABOUT OVER OUR
ZONES BEFORE BECOMING ABSORBED BY THE TROUGH TO THE NORTH. THIS
MOTION WOULD KEEP THE DRYING AND SINKING ASSOCIATED WITH THE LOW TO
THE NORTH OF OUR AREA. SO WILL CONTINUE TO SHOW AN INCREASE IN THE
PROBABILITIES TOMORROW. THE TROPICAL WAVE NEAR 55W SHOULD IMPACT US
ON MONDAY. THIS WOULD BE THE DAY WE SEE THE DRYING AND SUBSIDENCE.
OTHERWISE WHAT WE PREVIOUSLY EXPECTED IS WHAT IS IN THE FORECAST.
THE SURFACE TROUGH IS STILL IN THE OBSERVATIONS TODAY BUT SHOULD BE
VERY DIFFUSE BY TOMORROW. THEN BY SATURDAY THE SURFACE RIDGE SHOULD
BEGIN TO BUILD BACK TO OUR NORTH WITH THE WAVE COMING INTO THE AREA
ON MONDAY. WE WILL REMAIN IN AN EASTERLY FLOW PATTERN FOR THE REST
OF THE FORECAST.

&&

.MARINE...STILL RELATIVELY LIGHT WINDS UNTIL WE SEE THE APPROACH OF
THE WAVE. WILL STILL KEEP THE SPEEDS UNDER 15 KNOTS UNTIL WE HAVE A
BETTER INDICATION OF THE STRENGTH OF THE WAVE.
0 likes   

User avatar
BonesXL
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Homestead, Florida
Contact:

#2 Postby BonesXL » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:03 pm

Interesting...hopefully, it will remain a tropical wave.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11166
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

#3 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:07 pm

not even a recurve scenario in that discussion
0 likes   

Anonymous

#4 Postby Anonymous » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:08 pm

How can it recurve if the ridge builds back in?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11166
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

#5 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:12 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:How can it recurve if the ridge builds back in?



im in your boat mike, i dont think it will recurve, im just saying they dont even mention it, which is interesting to say the least
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4430
Age: 44
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#6 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:12 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:How can it recurve if the ridge builds back in?


LOL..Floyd Man this better come west...I have confidence in you...
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#7 Postby Trader Ron » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:27 pm

Pretty Bold forecast out 96 hours. :D
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#8 Postby Frank2 » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:40 pm

In reference to this wave, I must admit I'm a bit surprised at the strong TWO wording - it seems like some of the younger replacements at the NHC are a bit over-eager, considering the current visible loop:

http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huvsloop.html

notice that the convection remains stationary near 20N 55W, while the exposed wave continues rapidly westward.

Since Miles Lawrence is now retired (I was greatful to be at his retirement dinner), I can tell you that if he were on duty, he would have not given the wave as much credibility, and had written a much shorter TWO.

That's not to say that the current forecasters are inept, but, perhaps they are just not from the "old school" of being able to eyeball a system over strictly relying on what the computer model is saying, and perhaps is similar to what was said in the movie Twister, where Bill Harding states that the other storm chaser has the money and the technology, but not the instincts - something that is not taught in college.

Frank
Last edited by Frank2 on Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#9 Postby deltadog03 » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:45 pm

imo...that tells me that the ridge will push it WEST...like the Florida straights
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#10 Postby dixiebreeze » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Trader Ron wrote:Pretty Bold forecast out 96 hours. :D


Ditto
0 likes   

User avatar
TreasureIslandFLGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1584
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: Cancun, Mexico (northeast Yucatan coast)

#11 Postby TreasureIslandFLGal » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:50 pm

Tampa NWS (ruskin) has also insinuated that they believe the ridge will be building back in, albeit a little further north than it has been, but still causing anything coming along to head into Florida. They said the troughs will be retrograding westward to allow this as well.
0 likes   

Rainband

#12 Postby Rainband » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:57 pm

The good news is they say wave not sfc low. :P
0 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3261
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

#13 Postby chris_fit » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:58 pm

Yea no mention of TC... just a wave.... let it stay that way.... haha naaaaaaaaaaaaa :grrr: :grrr:
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#14 Postby deltadog03 » Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:13 pm

read the latest TPC/HPC disscussion...don't count on it being only a wave
0 likes   

HURRICANELONNY
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1386
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:48 am
Location: HOLLYWOOD.FL

WAVE VS HIGH

#15 Postby HURRICANELONNY » Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:31 pm

You have to read into the NWS forecasts. They usually are talking about surface observations when they talk about the High or Low moving back in. That is why the wave can't recurve because the surface winds will be from the east. If 92L forms then it's a whole nother story. When they say TUTT or upper low then they'll talking upper air disturbances.
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6400
Age: 61
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

#16 Postby boca » Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:54 pm

If 92L does develop wouldn't that cause the system to move poleward maybe up to the Carolina's rather than west into Florida.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#17 Postby deltadog03 » Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:01 pm

boca wrote:If 92L does develop wouldn't that cause the system to move poleward maybe up to the Carolina's rather than west into Florida.


depends on the strength of the ridge...it will NOT plow right through it
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#18 Postby WeatherEmperor » Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:19 pm

boca wrote:If 92L does develop wouldn't that cause the system to move poleward maybe up to the Carolina's rather than west into Florida.


why would it do that? Frances didnt move poleward when it was approaching FL so why should this thing? Doesnt it all depend on the strengh and positioning of the steering ridge?

<RICKY>
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests