As look as we have Sal no development

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6400
Age: 61
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

As look as we have Sal no development

#1 Postby boca » Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:48 am

According to Derek he posted that as look as SAL is present these waves won't develop and he knows this type of senario well.
0 likes   

robjay

#2 Postby robjay » Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:52 am

SAL stands for what?
Why does SAL prevent tropical development?
0 likes   

User avatar
cinlfla
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:16 pm
Location: Titusville, Florida on the Spacecoast

#3 Postby cinlfla » Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:56 am

According to Derek he posted that as look as SAL is present these waves won't develop and he knows this type of senario well.



Then whats the point in even putting up an invest and doing model plots if nothing will come out of these waves? Seems like a waste of time if Sal puts a halt to anything developing.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#4 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:06 am

cinlfla wrote:
According to Derek he posted that as look as SAL is present these waves won't develop and he knows this type of senario well.



Then whats the point in even putting up an invest and doing model plots if nothing will come out of these waves? Seems like a waste of time if Sal puts a halt to anything developing.


Thank you. I think I'll stick with what the NHC has to say. If they say there is a possibility then that's what I will believe. No offense to the Mets on this board but hey these guys at the NHC are in the positions they are in because they are the best.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#5 Postby x-y-no » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:35 am

The area of dry air ahead of Invest-92 appears to be eroding. Compare the latest analysis:

Image


with what it was like 24 hours earlier:

Image

At this rate, it seems to me that conditions will be OK for development in another day or at most two.

I freely admit that Derek knows far, far more than I do on this topic, however.

Jan
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29133
Age: 74
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#6 Postby vbhoutex » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:42 am

The maps posted do indicate that IMO the SAL is indeed weakening and/or moving a little N also. With that in mind I think that the new invests may have a better chance at development now than they did 24 hours ago when it was obvious that the SAL was very prevalent in that area.
0 likes   

User avatar
cinlfla
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:16 pm
Location: Titusville, Florida on the Spacecoast

#7 Postby cinlfla » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:44 am

When they put up an invest I would assume its because of the possibilities. I personally listen to them because I figure they are the experts but I don't recall them saying anything about the Sal hindering development at this time. I may be wrong dunno, but my Question was never answered, if no develpment then why the invest? Oh I just wanted to mention I listen to them not for what I want to hear but to get information for tracking purposes because I do enjoy Hurricane season.
0 likes   

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

#8 Postby bvigal » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:44 am

for those still asking: SAL = Saharan Air Layer = African dust

Hmmm, well I'd really like to discuss this issue, arugments aside, so I can learn something... OK guys?

I had a question about the SAL map, it looks as if Pacific is all dust, too. Is that correct, or can other conditions cause the red color, i.e. is all red SAL??? Or can I look at that map and incorrectly assume something is dust that really isn't?

And let's talk about layers of the atmosphere. Here, below 6,000ft. we are seeing clearing. I know that because every day I look my windows and there is an island, St. Thomas, which takes up 1/3 of my horizon view!! Today I can see it again.

But, how much dust is there as we go up from sea level? How low must dust be, what layer, to put the lid on development? To illustrate, with a wild extreme, does dust at 50,000ft. clamp development? (I know that answer :wink: )

Finally, let's talk about distance. A broad circulation like 92L can certainly pull in dust from hundreds of miles away, right? Can anyone show us a static visible sat pic this morning and indicate where dust is traveling and at what levels?

Thanks for any and all attempts to increase my knowledge!

By the way, if anyone is interested in health/environment issues related to dust, here are a few interesting links:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Dust/
http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/african_dust/
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#9 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:45 am

first one still seems to be over taken.

the one behind it could have some slow and milited development, but the chances are that both could develop once they clear 60W, or move north of 20N, where the SAL grip is less. A good example of that is Andrew
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#10 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:46 am

also,

I am going to start making precipitable water maps again in the near future of the tropical Atlantic, as I have done the past 2 years. Likely, this year I will use TRMM data, unlike years passed where I have used SSM/I as TRMM has slightly better coverage of the tropical regions
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#11 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:52 am

cinlfla wrote:When they put up an invest I would assume its because of the possibilities. I personally listen to them because I figure they are the experts but I don't recall them saying anything about the Sal hindering development at this time. I may be wrong dunno, but my Question was never answered, if no develpment then why the invest? Oh I just wanted to mention I listen to them not for what I want to hear but to get information for tracking purposes because I do enjoy Hurricane season.


That's is exactly how I feel and if it offended anyone well I'm sorry. If the NHC felt it was going to prevent development or was an issue then they would state it in the their outlooks. I have nothing else to say concerning SAL.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#12 Postby x-y-no » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:52 am

Derek Ortt wrote:first one still seems to be over taken.

the one behind it could have some slow and milited development, but the chances are that both could develop once they clear 60W, or move north of 20N, where the SAL grip is less. A good example of that is Andrew


OK, but that's a little different than what I understood you to be saying in the other thread, where you said they're "done."

I absolutely agree there's no prospect of development until these systems get out of this environment. It just seems to me that may happen for the lead system within the next two days, and for the following system maybe a day later.

Jan
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#13 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:55 am

the second one ahs the better chance. The first one looks as if it is under the sal. I do not recall a storm that was this entwined with the SAL to recover
0 likes   

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

for Derek

#14 Postby bvigal » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:57 am

Derek, can you answer any of my questions?

bvigal wrote:for those still asking: SAL = Saharan Air Layer = African dust

Hmmm, well I'd really like to discuss this issue, arugments aside, so I can learn something... OK guys?

I had a question about the SAL map, it looks as if Pacific is all dust, too. Is that correct, or can other conditions cause the red color, i.e. is all red SAL??? Or can I look at that map and incorrectly assume something is dust that really isn't?

And let's talk about layers of the atmosphere. Here, below 6,000ft. we are seeing clearing. I know that because every day I look my windows and there is an island, St. Thomas, which takes up 1/3 of my horizon view!! Today I can see it again.

But, how much dust is there as we go up from sea level? How low must dust be, what layer, to put the lid on development? To illustrate, with a wild extreme, does dust at 50,000ft. clamp development? (I know that answer :wink: )

Finally, let's talk about distance. A broad circulation like 92L can certainly pull in dust from hundreds of miles away, right? Can anyone show us a static visible sat pic this morning and indicate where dust is traveling and at what levels?

Thanks for any and all attempts to increase my knowledge!

By the way, if anyone is interested in health/environment issues related to dust, here are a few interesting links:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Dust/
http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/african_dust/
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#15 Postby x-y-no » Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:58 am

Derek Ortt wrote:the second one ahs the better chance. The first one looks as if it is under the sal. I do not recall a storm that was this entwined with the SAL to recover


It does look like the dry air is completely over the center. It sure would be extraordinary for this system to recover from that.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#16 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:00 am

on that map, all dry air shows up the same as it is a combo product with 2 different satellite wavelengths.

From looking at GPS dropsondes, the SAL is between 2 and 5KM above the surface. You likely won't experience much drier conditions at the surface

yes, dust can be entrained into the center from far away. However, in a peper I am hoping to soon have published, I have found that this seems to happen typially in conjunction with shear
0 likes   

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

#17 Postby bvigal » Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:14 am

Derek Ortt wrote:on that map, all dry air shows up the same as it is a combo product with 2 different satellite wavelengths.

From looking at GPS dropsondes, the SAL is between 2 and 5KM above the surface. You likely won't experience much drier conditions at the surface

yes, dust can be entrained into the center from far away. However, in a peper I am hoping to soon have published, I have found that this seems to happen typially in conjunction with shear


Thank you!
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 69
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#18 Postby mf_dolphin » Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:25 am

ADMIN Note: Step away from the keyboard if your blood pressure is going up. I've sent a couple of PM's already. Let's get back on track before people get a vacation.......
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#19 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:34 am

I was a bit out of line with some of the statements I made, and I regret making those statements
0 likes   

recmod
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#20 Postby recmod » Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:00 am

Derek Ortt wrote:first one still seems to be over taken.

the one behind it could have some slow and milited development, but the chances are that both could develop once they clear 60W, or move north of 20N, where the SAL grip is less. A good example of that is Andrew


Looking at those images of the SAL posted above, I'd say that the area above 20N has a much stronger SAL than the tropical regions to the south (the orange dust layer is mostly confined above 20N)...unless I am reading those maps completely wrong.

--Lou
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], KirbyDude25, pepecool20 and 36 guests