Now batting: 90L
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5

- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
- stormie_skies
- Category 5

- Posts: 3318
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
- Location: League City, TX
HouTXmetro wrote:Wait, I thought this was 99L?
As I understand it, 99L split in two a few days ago.....the part that continued to be tracked as 99L traveled northward. This is the other part, which traveled westward. It was given a new name because it wasnt considered to be the former center of 99L....and because both parts cant keep the same name....
0 likes
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive

- Posts: 29133
- Age: 74
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
stormie_skies wrote:HouTXmetro wrote:Wait, I thought this was 99L?
As I understand it, 99L split in two a few days ago.....the part that continued to be tracked as 99L traveled northward. This is the other part, which traveled westward. It was given a new name because it wasnt considered to be the former center of 99L....and because both parts cant keep the same name....
Correct!!
And so much for any rest!! Maybe it will do nothing!! We can always hope!!
0 likes
-
gkrangers
Do nothing would be boring...I'd settle for a nice little TS, Cat 1 tops.vbhoutex wrote:stormie_skies wrote:HouTXmetro wrote:Wait, I thought this was 99L?
As I understand it, 99L split in two a few days ago.....the part that continued to be tracked as 99L traveled northward. This is the other part, which traveled westward. It was given a new name because it wasnt considered to be the former center of 99L....and because both parts cant keep the same name....
Correct!!
And so much for any rest!! Maybe it will do nothing!! We can always hope!!
Gives us something to talk about, without the consequences of a major hurricane....
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met

- Posts: 23080
- Age: 68
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
I've been checking out the 18Z model guidance to see where they think 90L may go. 18Z GFS and ETA say northwest then north then northeast and out to sea, just like the BAMS model was indicating. 12Z NOGAPS says the same thing. 12Z ECMWF moves it into the eastern FL Peninsula then northward. UKMET is similar to the ECMWF. For what it's worth, the Canadian is on the east of Florida bandwagon as well. Even the experimental WRF model says east of Florida. The 18Z MM5 out of FSU isn't all in yet, but it looks like it's saying east of Florida as well. None of the models develops the wave into anything significant.
The only models I can find that bring the wave into the eastern Gulf now are the BAMM/BAMD. These two models are not dynamic, so they shouldn't be used north of the deep tropics, however.
So maybe, just maybe, we won't have another storm in the Gulf this weekend. And maybe I can finally get a few days off.....
The only models I can find that bring the wave into the eastern Gulf now are the BAMM/BAMD. These two models are not dynamic, so they shouldn't be used north of the deep tropics, however.
So maybe, just maybe, we won't have another storm in the Gulf this weekend. And maybe I can finally get a few days off.....
0 likes
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
wxman57 wrote:I've been checking out the 18Z model guidance to see where they think 90L may go. 18Z GFS and ETA say northwest then north then northeast and out to sea, just like the BAMS model was indicating. 12Z NOGAPS says the same thing. 12Z ECMWF moves it into the eastern FL Peninsula then northward. UKMET is similar to the ECMWF. For what it's worth, the Canadian is on the east of Florida bandwagon as well. Even the experimental WRF model says east of Florida. The 18Z MM5 out of FSU isn't all in yet, but it looks like it's saying east of Florida as well. None of the models develops the wave into anything significant.
The only models I can find that bring the wave into the eastern Gulf now are the BAMM/BAMD. These two models are not dynamic, so they shouldn't be used north of the deep tropics, however.
So maybe, just maybe, we won't have another storm in the Gulf this weekend. And maybe I can finally get a few days off.....
i wouldn't be making an issue out of days off around weather offices anytime soon or you might end up like t.johnston in miami.
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=68702
0 likes
-
Rainband
- southerngale
- Retired Staff

- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
Rainband wrote:I have said many times how some of the Texas discussions get eager too early in the game. Just an observation I have made.BayouVenteux wrote:Different NWS office, different take. From this morning's New Orleans office AFD:
THE BACKDOOR FRONT WILL STALL OVER THE CENTRAL GULF COAST ON SATURDAY...LEADING TO A CONTINUED HIGHER COVERAGE OF THUNDERSTORMS. HOWEVER...IT APPEARS THAT A VIGOROUS TROPICAL WAVE WILL SLIDE INTO THE GULF OF MEXICO LATE SATURDAY...AND QUICKLY PULL TOWARD LOUISIANA AND TEXAS SUNDAY. AS THIS WAVE APPROACHES FROM THE SOUTHEAST...IT WILL FORCE THE WEAK FRONTAL BOUNDARY TO PULL NORTHWARD...AS THE MID-LEVEL RIDGING ERODES ACROSS THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY...AND STRONGER SOUTHERLY FLOW DEVELOPS IN THE MID-LEVELS OF THE ATMOSPHERE. AS A RESULT...DECIDED TO REDUCE POPS TO LOW END CHANCE POPS...AND RAISE TEMPERATURES SLIGHTLY SUNDAY AND MONDAY. GOING INTO TUESDAY...THE RIDGING WILL BREAK DOWN QUITE A BIT ACROSS THE SOUTHEAST...AS A STRONG LONG WAVE TROUGH AND COLD FRONT PUSH THROUGH THE PLAINS AND MIDWEST...CREATING A MORE ZONAL FLOW FOR THE AREA.
That's very interesting because almost every time someone mentions that something far out or not developed yet (and maybe even already developed!) might head this way, I check the Lake Charles and Houston discussions (I live between the two but technically am in the Lake Charles NWS zone), and they RARELY mention anything. I'm not saying they never do because obviously one did above, but almost every time I'm looking to see if they mention something that I've heard somewhere else, always NADA. Maybe you just happen to hit it at the right times. lol
They're generally very conservative about things, at least IMO.
0 likes
-
Rainband
I will find the ones I am talking about later. Sorry didn't mean to frazzle anyone. Just something I noticedsoutherngale wrote:Rainband wrote:I have said many times how some of the Texas discussions get eager too early in the game. Just an observation I have made.BayouVenteux wrote:Different NWS office, different take. From this morning's New Orleans office AFD:
THE BACKDOOR FRONT WILL STALL OVER THE CENTRAL GULF COAST ON SATURDAY...LEADING TO A CONTINUED HIGHER COVERAGE OF THUNDERSTORMS. HOWEVER...IT APPEARS THAT A VIGOROUS TROPICAL WAVE WILL SLIDE INTO THE GULF OF MEXICO LATE SATURDAY...AND QUICKLY PULL TOWARD LOUISIANA AND TEXAS SUNDAY. AS THIS WAVE APPROACHES FROM THE SOUTHEAST...IT WILL FORCE THE WEAK FRONTAL BOUNDARY TO PULL NORTHWARD...AS THE MID-LEVEL RIDGING ERODES ACROSS THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY...AND STRONGER SOUTHERLY FLOW DEVELOPS IN THE MID-LEVELS OF THE ATMOSPHERE. AS A RESULT...DECIDED TO REDUCE POPS TO LOW END CHANCE POPS...AND RAISE TEMPERATURES SLIGHTLY SUNDAY AND MONDAY. GOING INTO TUESDAY...THE RIDGING WILL BREAK DOWN QUITE A BIT ACROSS THE SOUTHEAST...AS A STRONG LONG WAVE TROUGH AND COLD FRONT PUSH THROUGH THE PLAINS AND MIDWEST...CREATING A MORE ZONAL FLOW FOR THE AREA.
That's very interesting because almost every time someone mentions that something far out or not developed yet (and maybe even already developed!) might head this way, I check the Lake Charles and Houston discussions (I live between the two but technically am in the Lake Charles NWS zone), and they RARELY mention anything. I'm not saying they never do because obviously one did above, but almost every time I'm looking to see if they mention something that I've heard somewhere else, always NADA. Maybe you just happen to hit it at the right times. lol
They're generally very conservative about things, at least IMO.
0 likes
-
corpusbreeze
- Category 1

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:57 pm
What about that so called high pressure sitting over the South East USA? Emily couldnt buck it .wxman57 wrote:I've been checking out the 18Z model guidance to see where they think 90L may go. 18Z GFS and ETA say northwest then north then northeast and out to sea, just like the BAMS model was indicating. 12Z NOGAPS says the same thing. 12Z ECMWF moves it into the eastern FL Peninsula then northward. UKMET is similar to the ECMWF. For what it's worth, the Canadian is on the east of Florida bandwagon as well. Even the experimental WRF model says east of Florida. The 18Z MM5 out of FSU isn't all in yet, but it looks like it's saying east of Florida as well. None of the models develops the wave into anything significant.
The only models I can find that bring the wave into the eastern Gulf now are the BAMM/BAMD. These two models are not dynamic, so they shouldn't be used north of the deep tropics, however.
So maybe, just maybe, we won't have another storm in the Gulf this weekend. And maybe I can finally get a few days off.....
0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Team Ghost and 272 guests




