90L Invest
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5

- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
- HouTXmetro
- Category 5

- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: District of Columbia, USA
- Scott_inVA
- Storm2k Forecaster

- Posts: 1238
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 5:44 pm
- Location: Lexington, Virginia
- Contact:
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5

- Posts: 5280
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
IF (and that's still in doubt) this develops I just don't see how it can go up the East coast. It should cross Fl and enter the GOM. Then after that well my thinking is Central or Eastern GOM. I don't think this wil be a Texas threat. But again this ALL based on something actually developing.
0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
-
Rainband
- jasons2k
- Storm2k Executive

- Posts: 8250
- Age: 52
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
- Location: The Woodlands, TX
I'm confused, some of the TX forecast disucssions overnight and this AM referenced a wave that was supposed to move in on ~Monday-Tuesday next week. I assumed it was 90 (old 99).
Now the models are fishing with 90.
Is this the same system or did I really miss something? Sorry, been in meetings all day and litttle time to get updated.
Now the models are fishing with 90.
Is this the same system or did I really miss something? Sorry, been in meetings all day and litttle time to get updated.
0 likes
jschlitz wrote:I'm confused, some of the TX forecast disucssions overnight and this AM referenced a wave that was supposed to move in on ~Monday-Tuesday next week. I assumed it was 90 (old 99).
Now the models are fishing with 90.
Is this the same system or did I really miss something? Sorry, been in meetings all day and litttle time to get updated.
You should look at some of discussions coming out of the Miami and Melbourne offices. They are talking about this more:
From the Miami NWS:
BEHIND THIS RIPPLE...THE NEXT FEATURE SHOULD BE A TROPICAL
WAVE/DISTURBANCE ACROSS HISPANIOLA INTO THE CARIBBEAN ADVANCING
TOWARD SOUTH FLORIDA. MOST OF THE CONVECTION IS NORTH OF
HISPANIOLA. THIS DISTURBANCE COULD ENHANCE CONVECTION THURSDAY
AND FRIDAY ACROSS OUR AREA BUT THE DEVIL WILL BE IN THE DETAILS.
NAM AND GFS NOW SEEM TO AGREE ON MOVING THE DISTURBANCE ACROSS THE
FAR SIDE OF THE BAHAMAS THROUGH THURSDAY NIGHT. THEN THEY BOTH
DEVELOP A CLOSED LOW...TROPICAL DEPRESSION?...EAST OF THE FLORIDA
PENINSULA BY FRIDAY MORNING AND MOVE IT NORTH WITHOUT REALLY
AFFECTING THE STATE. WITH A WEAK SYSTEM IT WOULD SEEM MORE LOGICAL
THAT THE SYSTEM WOULD CONTINUE MOVING ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
RIDGE AND ACROSS THE PENINSULA. THE MODEL SCENARIO SEEMS QUESTIONABLE
AND IT WILL BE INTERESTING TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS. FOR THIS PACKAGE
WILL EXPECT DISTURBANCE TO CONTINUE WEST-NORTHWEST AND SHOW
ENHANCEMENT OF CONVECTION ACROSS SOUTH FLORIDA THURSDAY AND
FRIDAY...TRENDING BACK TOWARD CLIMATOLOGY FOR THE WEEKEND.
From the Melbourne NWS office:
FRI-SAT...NEW INTEREST IN THE T-WAVE OVER HISPANIOLA AND THE SRN
BAHAMAS AS NHC INDICATED EARLIER TODAY. UPR LVL ENVIRONMENT IS NOT
LOOKING AS UNFAVORABLE AS BEFORE...AND INITIAL MODEL RUNS BRING THE
SYSTEM TOO CLOSE TO THE EAST FL COAST TO IGNORE. STILL...WITH NO
STORM CURRENTLY IN PLACE...THE ONLY OPTION AS FAR AS FORECASTING IS
CONCERNED IS TO INCREASE POPS/SKY COVER AREAWIDE FOR THE WEEKEND.
ALSO WILL ADJUST MIN TEMPS UP TO REFLECT INCREASED CLOUD COVER AND
STRONGER NOCTURNAL SFC WINDS. STAY TUNED.
Last edited by Thunder44 on Wed Jul 20, 2005 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Thunder44 wrote:jschlitz wrote:I'm confused, some of the TX forecast disucssions overnight and this AM referenced a wave that was supposed to move in on ~Monday-Tuesday next week. I assumed it was 90 (old 99).
Now the models are fishing with 90.
Is this the same system or did I really miss something? Sorry, been in meetings all day and litttle time to get updated.
You should look at some of discussions coming out of the Miami and Melbourne offices. They are talking about this more:
I will post them shortly.
Miami doesnt seem real excited about it, melbourne is luke warm
0 likes
- chris_fit
- Category 5

- Posts: 3261
- Age: 42
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
- Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
FRI-SAT...NEW INTEREST IN THE T-WAVE OVER HISPANIOLA AND THE SRN
BAHAMAS AS NHC INDICATED EARLIER TODAY. UPR LVL ENVIRONMENT IS NOT
LOOKING AS UNFAVORABLE AS BEFORE...AND INITIAL MODEL RUNS BRING THE
SYSTEM TOO CLOSE TO THE EAST FL COAST TO IGNORE. STILL...WITH NO
STORM CURRENTLY IN PLACE...THE ONLY OPTION AS FAR AS FORECASTING IS
CONCERNED IS TO INCREASE POPS/SKY COVER AREAWIDE FOR THE WEEKEND.
ALSO WILL ADJUST MIN TEMPS UP TO REFLECT INCREASED CLOUD COVER AND
STRONGER NOCTURNAL SFC WINDS. STAY TUNED.
SUN-WED...THE POSITION OF THE BERMUDA RIDGE IS THE PRIMARY WX FACTOR
FOR THE FL PENINSULA THIS TIME OF YEAR. HOWEVER...THE POTENTIAL
T-WAVE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE THE BOTTLENECK AS TRYING TO FORECAST ITS
POSITION BEYOND 72HRS. WILL DEFAULT LARGELY TO CLIMO.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 379 guests




