Emily's is over?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Pebbles
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
- Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)
Emily's is over?
I just find it very interesting that only now is Emily's eastern eyewall making it on land and the northwest eyewall starting to affect Mexico for the past hour or so. You know.. the part with the highest winds... Why have most started talking like Emily is over? Just something I have noticed with most storms is everyone moves on to the next storm at ... if not before ... storms are 'declared' to make landfall. In the case of Emily and the fact she is moving westward... Landfall was just when the heaviest winds were only beginning to effect land. Just an observation to note...
0 likes
- MBismyPlayground
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 765
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 9:25 pm
- Location: myrtle beach, sc
- Contact:
Pebbles, I noticed the same thing. I am curious as to the damage that Emily is creating in Mexico and S. Texas. I think it is a bit quick to say that it is over, until damage can be determined. The rain and winds are still there, and well it ain't over til its over. Plus now just hearing tornado damage in Brownsville.
I guess it is easy to consider Emily over if it doesn't have a personal effect on some.
I guess it is easy to consider Emily over if it doesn't have a personal effect on some.
0 likes
- Pebbles
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
- Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)
Brent wrote:gboudx wrote:My guess is because it didn't make landfall in the US. And there aren't any(or many) posters down in that area of Mexico to report the conditions.
You hit the nail on the head.
I would agree with that... if I didn't notice the same phenomenon with Dennis.
0 likes
-
Big-Iguana
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38266
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Pebbles wrote:Brent wrote:gboudx wrote:My guess is because it didn't make landfall in the US. And there aren't any(or many) posters down in that area of Mexico to report the conditions.
You hit the nail on the head.
I would agree with that... if I didn't notice the same phenomenon with Dennis.and most storms last year ...an exception that I can think off the top of my head being maybe frances ...because she was expected to go back over water...
Well... since this is the tropics board, once landfall is done, people here don't focus on it. We have a Severe Weather and a US Weather Watch board for inland affects. Only if something is over water does it generally garner attention.
0 likes
#neversummer
-
wxcrazytwo
MBismyPlayground wrote:Pebbles, I noticed the same thing. I am curious as to the damage that Emily is creating in Mexico and S. Texas. I think it is a bit quick to say that it is over, until damage can be determined. The rain and winds are still there, and well it ain't over til its over. Plus now just hearing tornado damage in Brownsville.
I guess it is easy to consider Emily over if it doesn't have a personal effect on some.
DOES ANYONE KNOW THE STATUS OF BROWNSVILL AND THE DAMAGE SO FAR?
0 likes
I'm worried about the damage since she is moving so slowly. Prolonged rain and wind from a slow moving hurricane do a lot more damage than a fast moving storm.
I was looking at the water vapor loop this morning and was wondering what was causing her slow speed.
The circulation is likely to be around for a while so the storm could go back out over water if a digging trough came along or a high built to her south.
Usually troughs shear rather than steer weak circulations though.
I was looking at the water vapor loop this morning and was wondering what was causing her slow speed.
The circulation is likely to be around for a while so the storm could go back out over water if a digging trough came along or a high built to her south.
Usually troughs shear rather than steer weak circulations though.
0 likes
-
wxcrazytwo
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator

- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
wxcrazytwo wrote:dhweather wrote:If it does not directly affect the US, then generally, it gets very little attention.
Also, that area is sparsely populated, so reports will be few and far between.
DH, I hardly call 106,202,903 (July 2005 est.) sparsely populated. I just think because it is Mexico who cares.
I think the landfall area, where the core passed over with the max winds,
had a town of 20,000 nearby, that's about it. I'm not trying to minimize it, it's a major hurricane making landfall. My point is that the mass media
doesn't really care about hurricanes that do no affect the US, or ones that
do not kill thousands, such as Mitch.
Think of Don Henley's "Dirty Laundry"
0 likes
- Pebbles
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
- Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)
dhweather wrote:wxcrazytwo wrote:dhweather wrote:If it does not directly affect the US, then generally, it gets very little attention.
Also, that area is sparsely populated, so reports will be few and far between.
DH, I hardly call 106,202,903 (July 2005 est.) sparsely populated. I just think because it is Mexico who cares.
I think the landfall area, where the core passed over with the max winds,
had a town of 20,000 nearby, that's about it. I'm not trying to minimize it, it's a major hurricane making landfall. My point is that the mass media
doesn't really care about hurricanes that do no affect the US, or ones that
do not kill thousands, such as Mitch.
Think of Don Henley's "Dirty Laundry"
Actually i've been watching the major news media outlets and they have been on and off reporting from the storm all morning *winks*
0 likes
- BayouVenteux
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 775
- Age: 64
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:26 pm
- Location: Ascension Parish, Louisiana (30.3 N 91.0 W)
-
Stormtrack
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 112
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:11 pm
- Location: Angleton, Tx
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38266
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
wxcrazytwo wrote:MBismyPlayground wrote:Pebbles, I noticed the same thing. I am curious as to the damage that Emily is creating in Mexico and S. Texas. I think it is a bit quick to say that it is over, until damage can be determined. The rain and winds are still there, and well it ain't over til its over. Plus now just hearing tornado damage in Brownsville.
I guess it is easy to consider Emily over if it doesn't have a personal effect on some.
DOES ANYONE KNOW THE STATUS OF BROWNSVILL AND THE DAMAGE SO FAR?
I suspect any damage is confined to maybe some trees/limbs here and there. I haven't seen any wind gusts over 60 mph reported there.
0 likes
#neversummer
- TexasStooge
- Category 5

- Posts: 38127
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
- Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 188 guests

