Emily missing her points

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
calidoug
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 480
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:13 pm

#21 Postby calidoug » Mon Jul 18, 2005 6:39 pm

Steve wrote:The NHC and most of the models maintain that westward bend toward the end of the track, so I'm thinking it's gonna happen regardless of how it tracks the rest of this evening. JTWC's got Haitang going in around 25.2 on a WNW heading with a kinda-sorta-similar bend (though not as pronounced) on Wednesday. The NHC takes Emily only as far north as 24.5. I think it would have been a more interesting case had Haitang not weakened as much as it did over Taiwan because that could obviously play a factor in whether or not they would have hit at closer latitudes. I still think the Atlantic/Pacific parallel was pretty good for these storms, especially considering we're in July.

Steve


What happens 1/2-way around the globe with a typhoon has no bearing on what is simultaneously going on over here, JB's bizarre theories (if you can call them that) notwithstanding.

A 6-10 day delay with certain large features influencing the weather over here is one thing. Imaginary instantaneous "parallels" are another matter completely, and a bunch of hogwash, IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9628
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#22 Postby Steve » Mon Jul 18, 2005 6:59 pm

>>What happens 1/2-way around the globe with a typhoon has no bearing on what is simultaneously going on over here, JB's bizarre theories (if you can call them that) notwithstanding.

I'm not offering a theory. I'm just saying it was a cool phenomina with a chance to test out and learn a few things (more if Haitang hadn't weakened as much as it did).

I think he uses the 6-10 day east coast trof/ridge one more (as you noted). But if you look at the globe, there seems to be a lot of sharp amplification. In the Northern Atlantic, we're coming out of a positive NAO phase. The water temperature profiles have vaguely matched quite a bit this season too.

>>Imaginary instantaneous "parallels" are another matter completely, and a bunch of hogwash, IMO.

Come on man. There's an obvious parallel. Again, I'm not saying it means anything, but it is interesting. You don't have to like it or you can have a vendetta or whatever. I'm just pointing out the incidence and saying it's a trip for July. But whatever I guess.

Steve
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#23 Postby djtil » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:25 pm

i think all this worry is likely unnecessary.....the models would have to be very far off for there to be real danger in south texas.....a little north might lead to a gusty day but we are talking 120-150 miles off to actually bear the brunt of the now only cat 1 winds. just seems like a freak of nature right now if the forecast track would really be THAT far off.

i dont see any reason that the ridge wont strengthen and push west as advertised....any slight northward bobble now is probably just that...a bobble.

it seems like no matter what the nhc forecasts people gripe that the doomsday alerts arent sounded for a much wider area....in reality that just isnt feasible...and IMO the NHC...and their built in margin of errors..should be trusted.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#24 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:29 pm

ok, mgc, did you see houstons AFD?? also, i think derek made mention that the GFS was of on intializing emily on the 18z run...BUT, it did CLEARLY show the weakness....and yeah, mgc, the pressures are correct...that high has backed of somewhat....
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#25 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:38 pm

120 miles off for a 48 hour forecast is actually not that far off. The mean error is about 160 miles
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#26 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:41 pm

ok, cool..thanks...derek...what did the 00z models intialize for motion do you know?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#27 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:43 pm

300/14
0 likes   

User avatar
loon
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:50 pm
Location: Downtown Houston

#28 Postby loon » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:43 pm

alright, powers that be, push this to houston,k , thanks

cheers,
loon
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#29 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:44 pm

avni actually this time has a track that passes the giggle test. Comes inland at about 25.2, which is about 50NM south of the border. Depends upon the eye size then as to whether or not Brownsville gets the eye wall
0 likes   

User avatar
TampaFl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1905
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Tampa, FL

#30 Postby TampaFl » Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:47 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5444
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#31 Postby Nimbus » Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:16 pm

That ULL to the south of Emily is starting to fill in but it does look like she followed it westward some unless that recent motion is just a wobble.
We are seeing a lot more symmetrical storm now so intensity forecast will probably need to go up.
Hope south Texas gets lucky.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#32 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:19 pm

we aren't seeing the intensificaton though that has been expected

yes, dennis went from a TS to a cat 4 in about 18 hours in the GOM (it likely did weaken to a TS briefly while over Cuba), but it had a tight core. This has become all broad and spread out. Marginal 3 is probably the most this will become now
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5444
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#33 Postby Nimbus » Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:50 pm

I agree slower spin up with a large eye.
We have 24 + hours till landfall over 30 degree water, I would prefer to see a smaller eye that she would be more likely to outgrow.
I am visualizing rather large wind fields by tomorrow night.
0 likes   

mahicks
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:25 pm

#34 Postby mahicks » Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:53 pm

TampaFl wrote:Center definatley north of the forecasted track. :eek:

Robert 8-)


http://wxweb.meteostar.com/cgi-bin/archive/tropical.cgi?&&leads_images/tropical/GMH/IR/


Awesome link!!! I'll be bookmarking this one!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#35 Postby Swimdude » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:19 pm

I'm actually wondering if tomorrow's 40% chance of rain, and Wednesday's 50% chance of rain [for Houston] is from the outer bands of Emily. That certainly looks possible.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
amawea
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 385
Age: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:36 pm
Location: Horseshoe Bend, Ar. but from Baytown, Tx

#36 Postby amawea » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:23 pm

calidoug wrote,

"What happens 1/2-way around the globe with a typhoon has no bearing on what is simultaneously going on over here, JB's bizarre theories (if you can call them that) notwithstanding"

Yes, the weather half way around the globe does compare with our weather here. It's troughs, ridges, troughs ridges, all the way around the globe and each one affects the other. Get a grip, J.B. knows more about the teleconnections than you will ever dream of.
Whats your deal with the slamming of an ideaolgy that is in it's infancy as far as forecasting. He's on to something., and I really picked up on it about a year ago.
Amawea
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#37 Postby HouTXmetro » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:26 pm

Swimdude wrote:I'm actually wondering if tomorrow's 40% chance of rain, and Wednesday's 50% chance of rain [for Houston] is from the outer bands of Emily. That certainly looks possible.

Image


With the saturated grounds, any training rain from Emily would not be good for Houston.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#38 Postby Brent » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:29 pm

Current motion brings it in just south of Brownsville in Mexico...

NHC needs a hurricane warning for South Padre now.

Image
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

#39 Postby Portastorm » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:33 pm

Brent, how dare you question the NHC? :wink:
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#40 Postby jkt21787 » Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:35 pm

Sorry Brent, not happening with this advisory. :)
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: wwizard and 51 guests