Back to a westward course

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#21 Postby djtil » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:11 am

djtil wrote:
Quote:
Emily is headed for a S.Texas landfall


come on....with a comment like that so opposed to any evidence at least state your reasons.


Geez, you make it sound like she said Miami or Tampa! South Texas is in the cone


LOL...I guess you are right.....but only the extreme northern part of the cone....I think JB is forecasting a Miami hit and then on to Denver.
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#22 Postby Swimdude » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:12 am

Just an observation... Those rain bands are pretty far North. Where do y'all think Emily would have to make landfall to give Houston a shower or two?
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#23 Postby southerngale » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:18 am

djtil wrote:LOL...I guess you are right.....but only the extreme northern part of the cone....I think JB is forecasting a Miami hit and then on to Denver.


Yeah, but in the cone so I wouldn't think she would need to give some huge spill about how it's possible. :) That's just her prediction within the cone since it likely won't go smack dab down the middle.

Miami, then Denver...funny. But I did see Bastardi on Fox News last night. He explained the high and reasoning behind the forecasted track well for those who don't follow hurricanes as much as most of us here do.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5280
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

#24 Postby PTrackerLA » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:19 am

I'm thinking that south Texas is probably safe from Emily now. I was concerned about the NW movement over the Yucatan but she is cleary turning back towards the WNW as she quickly moves into the BOC.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#25 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:42 am

Swimdude wrote:Just an observation... Those rain bands are pretty far North. Where do y'all think Emily would have to make landfall to give Houston a shower or two?


Middle Texas coastline, IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#26 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:50 am

she might be wobbling WNW....interesting on how that ULL continues to sit there and not move....that will not let her move DUE W....that will have to leave for a W track to start...
0 likes   

Rainband

#27 Postby Rainband » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:54 am

Texas will see rain out of this system and maybe some wind too be the center looks to make landfall in Mexico IMHO.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#28 Postby dwg71 » Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:59 am

Emily is not forcast to ever move due west, its been moving on or very near track.. Its going to Mexico, though extreme south Texas will have at least TS conditions to deal with.

Certainly the all clear can be given to anyone north (or east, its a curved coastline, you know what I mean though.) of corpus.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7404
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

#29 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Jul 18, 2005 12:07 pm

I think the southern tip of Texas landfall
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#30 Postby djtil » Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:06 pm

Emily is not forcast to ever move due west


actually most of the models do have a due west component before landfall.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10385
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

#31 Postby Sanibel » Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:15 pm

More west now.


Should landfall somewhere near La Pesca, Mexico north of Tampico...
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#32 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:17 pm

Sanibel wrote:More west now.


Should landfall somewhere near La Pesca, Mexico north of Tampico...


yup more westward now your right...
0 likes   

Kennethb
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:15 am
Location: Baton Rouge

#33 Postby Kennethb » Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:49 pm

It is really a battle of the ULL and Ridge. The models have done really well in figuring that the ridge will win. Look at how the outflow to the northeast is getting flattened, showing the strength of the ridge to push her WNW and eventually West.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests