mike18xx wrote:Judging from 2000Z vis, I say intensifying (read: high maximum gusts) at landfall.
Im sorry.
Emily is not intensifying right now...it looks like garbage. Maybe itll gain strentgh later, but now right now.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Normandy wrote:Well do you honestly think it looks like a 145 mph cane right now? Id venture to guess its weakened to about 125mph, so 100 kts isnt quite wishful imo (if it doesnt get its act together).
It looks like Charlie or Opal right now: smallish CDO with God-knows-what is going on around a still-veiled eye. Fortunately, wind radii have probably decreased relative to yesterday, but that may only be temporary.Normandy wrote:Well do you honestly think it looks like a 145 mph cane right now?.
mike18xx wrote:It looks like Charlie or Opal right now: smallish CDO with God-knows-what is going on around a still-veiled eye. Fortunately, wind radii have probably decreased relative to yesterday, but that may only be temporary.Normandy wrote:Well do you honestly think it looks like a 145 mph cane right now?.
The official forecast track is moved a little northward in response
to the guidance shift and is now in the middle of the guidance
envelope instead of the northern edge. This change in the forecast
track increases the threat to southern Texas.
stormie_skies wrote:Agreed, Brent. The NHC couldn't be much more blunt about it:The official forecast track is moved a little northward in response
to the guidance shift and is now in the middle of the guidance
envelope instead of the northern edge. This change in the forecast
track increases the threat to southern Texas.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests