Landfall -- Hmmm........
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
mike18xx
-
Stratosphere747
- Category 5

- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
mike18xx wrote:<Guffaw!> "Ignore that inconvenient data!"
I'm talking about the one at the NHC's site...Only updated every 00min..
Ah; gotchya. IMO, ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov is the only way to spy.
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... vair3.html
0 likes
-
mike18xx
-
Stratosphere747
- Category 5

- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
-
mike18xx
dwg71 wrote:
What's the source page for those? (I pawed all over http://www.sfwmd.gov looking for it.)
0 likes
As Deltadog3 noted last night Emily has been s l o w l y gaining latitude and is north of 17 now so you would normally start to expect more recurve....
I read the NHC forecast this morning and the pressures are up in the eye which is getting so small it will need replacing soon.
The outflow restriction they talked about appears to be a little shear from the southwest in the water vapor loop. Emily may well go through an ERC soon and stumble left a little as the UKMET track seems to indicate. This would cause her to spend more time over the Yucatan. Other than that there is not much new in the short term.
The Gulfstream IV data appears to support the J.B. scenario of a persistent weakness in the ridge for the long term forecast.
With Emily traveling over the warm gulf north of 20 this is not comforting from a steering point of view.
We may luck out and get some shear before the second landfall though.
I read the NHC forecast this morning and the pressures are up in the eye which is getting so small it will need replacing soon.
The outflow restriction they talked about appears to be a little shear from the southwest in the water vapor loop. Emily may well go through an ERC soon and stumble left a little as the UKMET track seems to indicate. This would cause her to spend more time over the Yucatan. Other than that there is not much new in the short term.
The Gulfstream IV data appears to support the J.B. scenario of a persistent weakness in the ridge for the long term forecast.
With Emily traveling over the warm gulf north of 20 this is not comforting from a steering point of view.
We may luck out and get some shear before the second landfall though.
0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
thanks nimbus, i am still unsure of a landfall...the ridge has NOT made it past LA yet....that is clearly evident on the SAT...and from the drops from the NOAA jet...the steering currents in the western gulf are out of the SSE or due S....that ridge better hurry up and get to the western gulf...imo..any thoughts??
0 likes
- HurryKane
- Category 5

- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 pm
- Location: Diamondhead, Mississippi
mike18xx wrote:dwg71 wrote:
What's the source page for those? (I pawed all over http://www.sfwmd.gov looking for it.)
I've never been able to find it either on my own, but once upon a time someone posted the very nondescript parent page: http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/omd/ops/weather/plots.html
Now how you get to THAT page from the SFWMD home page...I know not.
0 likes
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive

- Posts: 29133
- Age: 74
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
deltadog03 wrote:thanks nimbus, i am still unsure of a landfall...the ridge has NOT made it past LA yet....that is clearly evident on the SAT...and from the drops from the NOAA jet...the steering currents in the western gulf are out of the SSE or due S....that ridge better hurry up and get to the western gulf...imo..any thoughts??
Couldn't agree more with your statement. If those steering current winds don't shift more out of the SE we could well be looking at a more Northerly landfall than currently indicated. The other thig to be watching is the rises or falls around 500mb. If there are falls in the heights in this layer we would be seeing a possible weakenss in the ridge which again could bring Emily further to the North. Definitely still enough variables I am not comfortable pinpointing a landfall yet, even with the model consensus.
0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
vbhoutex wrote:deltadog03 wrote:thanks nimbus, i am still unsure of a landfall...the ridge has NOT made it past LA yet....that is clearly evident on the SAT...and from the drops from the NOAA jet...the steering currents in the western gulf are out of the SSE or due S....that ridge better hurry up and get to the western gulf...imo..any thoughts??
Couldn't agree more with your statement. If those steering current winds don't shift more out of the SE we could well be looking at a more Northerly landfall than currently indicated. The other thig to be watching is the rises or falls around 500mb. If there are falls in the heights in this layer we would be seeing a possible weakenss in the ridge which again could bring Emily further to the North. Definitely still enough variables I am not comfortable pinpointing a landfall yet, even with the model consensus.
thanks, i appreciate that...anyway, one more thing to consider...look at the SAT loop of the gulf...here is kicker right now for me...look at the storms over the eastern coast of Mexico...right now, they are moving DUE NORTH....almost NNE....we will have to see but, right now there is clearly a weakness there...also, NHC made mention either this morning or last night in there discussion that she might make a move towards the right after coming off the yuc...
0 likes
-
dolebot_Broward_NW
- Category 2

- Posts: 529
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:38 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 189 guests


