H Emily Recon Reports=Next Mission this evening
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Scorpion
Scorpion wrote:NHC is going to keep this at 155 mph for 5 PM I bet. This is a true Cat 5 I cant believe NHC is doing this its a historic event.
1 mph is not a huge deal except to weather weenies. The damage will still be catastrophic. If recon goes in this evening and finds a stronger system then, they will upgrade it. Its quite possible even if now it doesn't get upgraded, it will in the future on further analysis.
0 likes
-
gkrangers
-
mike18xx
Why? EWRC's aren't clockwork expectations, and the "stadium effect" 12-15 mile-wide eye is a pretty stable entity. If, west of Jamaica over maximum oceanic content, there is an EWRC, it'll probably be because hurricane-force wind radii are expanding dramatically, and the cycle could occur in tandam with (as opposed to) pressure falls and msw increases. A complete EWRC can also occur extremely rapidly as compared to weaker storms, such as in less than an hour.jkt21787 wrote:An EWRC seems almost certain in the very near future.
0 likes
mike18xx wrote:Why? EWRC's aren't clockwork expectations, and the "stadium effect" 12-15 mile-wide eye is a pretty stable entity. If, west of Jamaica over maximum oceanic content, there is an EWRC, it'll probably be because hurricane-force wind radii are expanding dramatically, and the cycle could occur in tandam with (as opposed to) pressure falls and msw increases. A complete EWRC can also occur extremely rapidly as compared to weaker storms, such as in less than an hour.jkt21787 wrote:An EWRC seems almost certain in the very near future.
Why? Because they're common in hurricanes of this intensity. I'm not saying one will happen soon, but it will happen at some point most likely. Given the nice stadium effect, it could in fact be a while though. We will have to wait and see.
0 likes
-
gkrangers
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Okay... you want to know another reason why NHC isn't upgrading this to category five? That 151kt report was a 30-sec peak wind. That doesn't quite make the standard "one-min average sustained" criteria. The highest sustained winds they've recorded was 148kt. Do the math... 153mph which rounds up to 155 mph. Category four.
NHC was right on their call. This isn't quite five status yet. This isn't about "being a weather weenie" and being scientific. Right, there isn't much of a difference, but let's call it as it is. 148kt sustained with a peak of 151 within a 30-second period. It doesn't quite cut it.
Trust me, the situation we are in now has happened many times before. Many. No storm, other than Andrew, was upgraded to category five on an end-of-year best track. If no further deepening occurs with Emily, it would also most likely remain category four in the best track.
Sorry, that may come as a sad note to those rooting for a cat five, but either way, the NHC is calling it by standards and regardless, Emily poses a grave threat.
NHC was right on their call. This isn't quite five status yet. This isn't about "being a weather weenie" and being scientific. Right, there isn't much of a difference, but let's call it as it is. 148kt sustained with a peak of 151 within a 30-second period. It doesn't quite cut it.
Trust me, the situation we are in now has happened many times before. Many. No storm, other than Andrew, was upgraded to category five on an end-of-year best track. If no further deepening occurs with Emily, it would also most likely remain category four in the best track.
Sorry, that may come as a sad note to those rooting for a cat five, but either way, the NHC is calling it by standards and regardless, Emily poses a grave threat.
0 likes
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
-
gkrangers
Good post, rely on the Vortex Message winds, as those are 1 minute, correct?senorpepr wrote:Okay... you want to know another reason why NHC isn't upgrading this to category five? That 151kt report was a 30-sec peak wind. That doesn't quite make the standard "one-min average sustained" criteria. The highest sustained winds they've recorded was 148kt. Do the math... 153mph which rounds up to 155 mph. Category four.
NHC was right on their call. This isn't quite five status yet. This isn't about "being a weather weenie" and being scientific. Right, there isn't much of a difference, but let's call it as it is. 148kt sustained with a peak of 151 within a 30-second period. It doesn't quite cut it.
Trust me, the situation we are in now has happened many times before. Many. No storm, other than Andrew, was upgraded to category five on an end-of-year best track. If no further deepening occurs with Emily, it would also most likely remain category four in the best track.
Sorry, that may come as a sad note to those rooting for a cat five, but either way, the NHC is calling it by standards and regardless, Emily poses a grave threat.
0 likes
senorpepr wrote:Okay... you want to know another reason why NHC isn't upgrading this to category five? That 151kt report was a 30-sec peak wind. That doesn't quite make the standard "one-min average sustained" criteria. The highest sustained winds they've recorded was 148kt. Do the math... 153mph which rounds up to 155 mph. Category four.
NHC was right on their call. This isn't quite five status yet. This isn't about "being a weather weenie" and being scientific. Right, there isn't much of a difference, but let's call it as it is. 148kt sustained with a peak of 151 within a 30-second period. It doesn't quite cut it.
Trust me, the situation we are in now has happened many times before. Many. No storm, other than Andrew, was upgraded to category five on an end-of-year best track. If no further deepening occurs with Emily, it would also most likely remain category four in the best track.
Sorry, that may come as a sad note to those rooting for a cat five, but either way, the NHC is calling it by standards and regardless, Emily poses a grave threat.
I think you just practically stuck a knife in the hearts of many on this board with those comments!
Its a strong cat 4, thats the bottom line here. Its not a cat 5 now. Does that mean it won't become one in the next few hours if not already, absolutely not. But right now we don't have a category 5 hurricane, but neverthes less the situation is very serious for Yucatan residents and also increasingly for the Caymans.
0 likes
-
mike18xx
*Shrug* A lot of people were calling Andrew a cat-5 for ages and ages upon all kinds of physical and other evidence; it took a decade for the reclassification to come, and sonde extrapolations are now computed differently as a result.gkrangers wrote:They are the EXPERTS. Let them handle it, k? If they wanna call it a Cat 4, its a Cat 4.Scorpion wrote:NHC is going to keep this at 155 mph for 5 PM I bet. This is a true Cat 5 I cant believe NHC is doing this its a historic event.
As the 'net gets better and better, mere proletarians will increasingly have access to near-real-time tools equivalent to that at the disposal of "the experts", and the appeal-to-authority fallacy will become increasingly threadbare. At that point, of course, one's record is of considerably more importance than whether or not you've managed employment.
Frankly, the insistance upon sticking with models ubiquitously forecasting 110kt maximum intensities (until "set up" exceeds that) in WNW Caribbean hurricanes is something I just don't understand. They have to know such critters are inadequate to the task.
I can only conclude that there are vanishing few who'll go out on a limb to make *human* predictions, and would instead rather let an algorithm "take the responsibility". Frankly, it's an excercise in bureaucratic butt-covering -- no one wants to take the blame for a 'bust'.
-- While it may take more balls than some have to predict a cat-5 from two or three days away, how much doubt is there, really, that almost any non-recurving WNW-tracker in the west-CAR in a non-El-Nino year will make at least cat-4 provided it's already a cat-2 in the east end? How many on record haven't in the satellite era? Less than 20%?
Last edited by mike18xx on Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Okay, mission IX (AF flight 305) has begun, but I won't be decoding any observations from this aircraft. This aircraft is performing an upper-level synoptic flight, flying at 24,000 to 30,000ft. However... mission X should be preparing for takeoff any time now. Once they get rolling down the runway, I'll pass it along here. I will begin decoding mission X as they approach Emily.
BTW, you can grab raw observations off of S2K's recon page at http://tropicalupdates.nhcwx.com/recon.htm
BTW, you can grab raw observations off of S2K's recon page at http://tropicalupdates.nhcwx.com/recon.htm
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 311 guests

