Breaking News Statement from NHC
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- HalloweenGale
- Category 1

- Posts: 377
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 7:31 pm
- Location: Nantucket Ma
- Contact:
- feederband
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Lakeland Fl
dhweather wrote:Swimdude wrote:Been a supporter of her become a cat. 5 all along... And now she's about 7 mph away.
Actually, from recon reports, she's 2MPH away. Not to nit pick, but I want to point out that we are witnessing a season that people will be talking about for DECADES to come.
I said that same words last year..."talking about 2004 season for decades to come" will we be saying this next year as well...?
0 likes
-
soonertwister
- Category 5

- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm
Mac wrote:Just a thought...
I'm an amateur, and admit I'm not extremely well versed on these things, but it almost appears as though Emily has entrained some dry air that she's trying to spit out? It appears dry air is entrained on the north and west sides of the storm, to me anyway. Perhaps there is some other explanation that evades me. Regardless, if Emma is able to wrap those outlying bands into her circulation, she'll be a much larger storm.
I think that Emily may have gulped some dry air at the surface yesterday. I have no other explanation for why the center went completely spastic for a while, rotating at a ridiculous rate. I've seen that behavior before in the NE GOM.
A large gulp of dry air will significantly weaken a cane, but if it's a sip, I'm of the opinion that it might serve to strengthen the cane, because the core is freed to spin up, with the circulation around the storm to follow.
That's just a theory, not a fact. It's bases are upon previous observation of hurricane characteristics, not on science.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: HurricaneFan, wwizard and 52 guests
