Here is what the 00Z Globals are saying!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#141 Postby southerngale » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:30 pm

rockyman wrote:This has probably already been posted..but the 00z MM5 shows Emily going north of Jamaica then hitting near the TX/LA border:

Image

Image

Here's the loop:
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/mm5fsutc2.cgi?time=2005071500&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation


Well, this is obviously a far right outlier, but just curious...what does it see? A weaker ridge?
0 likes   

gkrangers

#142 Postby gkrangers » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:31 pm

Trough drops down and develops a pretty significant weakness in the ridge, according to the MM5.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#143 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:32 pm

Wait, didn't the MM5 outperform all the other models last year?
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#144 Postby southerngale » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:35 pm

k, thanks gk. I don't buy this solution...it's all alone, just wondering what it saw. I can see where it shows the storm going but I've still got to learn what all the colorful swirly lines mean. ;)
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#145 Postby GalvestonDuck » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:38 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:Wait, didn't the MM5 outperform all the other models last year?


To quote Derek from a long past thread:
Derek Ortt wrote:for the 100th time

the FSU MM5 is run at too low of a resolution. MM5 needs to be run much higher, more like under 20km (tomorrow, with Dennis being farther to the west, I can start using 15km instead of 18

I keep meaning a low resolution, not high


And it had Dennis hitting Tampa at one time.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#146 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:40 pm

All I'm saying is that last year, I remember discussions about how the MM5 outperformed the other models. Is that correct?
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#147 Postby hicksta » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:44 pm

Im wondering how she will turn N like that so quickly.. Although these people know so much more than me i wouldnt be suprised.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#148 Postby GalvestonDuck » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:44 pm

I'm looking.... :)
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#149 Postby clfenwi » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:49 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:Wait, didn't the MM5 outperform all the other models last year?


Of the models that NHC keeps track of, the top performing model track-wise was the FSU Superensemble... see http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/2004.pdf

Note that NHC doesn't keep track of MM5 versions, so I don't know if there was a version that did even better than the Superensemble...
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#150 Postby deltadog03 » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:50 pm

I think the ridge is going to be weaker.....plus, i don't the models are handling the trof overhead right now either...TX trof i mean....
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#151 Postby southerngale » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:52 pm

deltadog03 wrote:I think the ridge is going to be weaker.....plus, i don't the models are handling the trof overhead right now either...TX trof i mean....


Why do you think it's going to be weaker? Just wondering if you have some reason for it or just one of those "gut" feelings people get. :P
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#152 Postby hicksta » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:53 pm

southerngale wrote:
deltadog03 wrote:I think the ridge is going to be weaker.....plus, i don't the models are handling the trof overhead right now either...TX trof i mean....


Why do you think it's going to be weaker? Just wondering if you have some reason for it or just one of those "gut" feelings people get. :P


You just reminded me off a feeling i get by roger creager. ima go listen to that song. =]. And delta you might be correct this far out so many possobilties we shall just see. you might be saying i told you so in a few days.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#153 Postby GalvestonDuck » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:53 pm

Maybe this will help also. I didn't really find any specifics about how well or poorly it performed for any particular storms last year, except this from Derecho that basically explains that it could be a good short-range model. Not saying it didn't do well -- I just haven't found anything one way or the other that specifically praises it for last year.

Derecho wrote:
rsm wrote:If I can add something here. When Charley was passing just north of Cuba I was sitting in Venice, FL. We were watching the Tampa NBC afffiliate weather and they had a system called VIPIR. Steve Jerve who is Channel 8's MET. said that 20 computer models had Charley going in just north of Tampa, but this one model or forecasting program called VIPIR had Charley going through Charlotte Harbor- Which it did.

Has anyone ever heard of this system elsewhere or give any credence to it's true abilities?

Thanks.



VIPIR isn't a computer forecast model. It's a system that local TV stations subscribe to to show fancy-schmancy 3-D graphics of radars and whatnot.

From various reports, it seems to me various local TV stations have used the MM5 model and falsely described it as "our" model..as if the station had its own computer model; it happened to perform very well for Charley on the short-range forecast, and I suspect this is what you were shown; not certain whether the station was deceptive or you misheard what he said.

The MM5 has some usefulness as a short-range model but it's no supermodel or anything, and you can't judge a model on one storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#154 Postby deltadog03 » Fri Jul 15, 2005 12:54 pm

southerngale wrote:
deltadog03 wrote:I think the ridge is going to be weaker.....plus, i don't the models are handling the trof overhead right now either...TX trof i mean....


Why do you think it's going to be weaker? Just wondering if you have some reason for it or just one of those "gut" feelings people get. :P


well, on some of the models it just looks like it fluxes back and forth...but, with that said, even if it is strong, the models are not seeming to grasp the idea that this trof overhead is worth anything...FWD made a great point this morning...the ULL will pretty much move to the SE and DEEPEN....jmo....we will see.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#155 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:01 pm

That coupled with the discussion from NOLA-NWS stating that the models are intializing the trough 2 degrees warmer than what they should be, (Whatever that means). I wish someone could provide more insight to the significance of the NWS-NOLA discussion last night.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29133
Age: 74
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#156 Postby vbhoutex » Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:02 pm

gkrangers wrote:Trough drops down and develops a pretty significant weakness in the ridge, according to the MM5.


This has been concerning me since it appears the trough may be sticking around long enough(longer than anticipated and maybe a little further South) and more disturbances may be riding along it to bring on a larger weakness than anticipated in the ridge. IF that happens then the MM5 scenario could become reality. Since none of the models I am aware of see it as the MM5 does, attm I can't place much credence in it. For the time being I am still anticipating a S TX landfall as the furtherest N it will go, but I am definitely watching Emily intently!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148502
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#157 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:06 pm

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 31&start=0

Go to todays 12z run of the globals at thread above at link to see the latest from them.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#158 Postby hicksta » Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:09 pm

cycloneye wrote:http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=68131&start=0

Go to todays 12z run of the globals at thread above at link to see the latest from them.


But models change so quickly this far out. some had it near free port the other day. All we can do right now is just sit relax and wait. thats all you can do. we should know soon this weekend
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gib, jhpigott, MetroMike, Sciencerocks and 320 guests