Here is what the 00Z Globals are saying!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
The fact that we are still talking about 4-5 days away and the models have shifted that much north concerns me. Now they could easily shift back south. The main thing to note is that maybe just maybe the High will build as far west or be as strong as first thought or some sort of trough will weaken it. Oh well so much for the "She is going to Mexico" talk for now.
0 likes
The 0Z GFS is approx 180NM miles further north at 96 hours...and even the newest NOGAPS guidance wants to take Emily near western Cuba and through the Yucatan channel.
This looks a bit drastic...well...more than a bt drastic compared to the 12Z runs.
Perhaps it's a shift...or perhaps it's something with the strength of the system in the models as opposed to the 12z guidance.
Anyway...I am having connection problems...so I probably wont get a chance to reply....hope this gets through...but concerns for an eventual US landfall have increased some based on what has come out so far. Remember the globals that have come out have previously been the LEFT outliers. Hard to imagine the GFDL and UKMET coming in left of this guidance...
MW
This looks a bit drastic...well...more than a bt drastic compared to the 12Z runs.
Perhaps it's a shift...or perhaps it's something with the strength of the system in the models as opposed to the 12z guidance.
Anyway...I am having connection problems...so I probably wont get a chance to reply....hope this gets through...but concerns for an eventual US landfall have increased some based on what has come out so far. Remember the globals that have come out have previously been the LEFT outliers. Hard to imagine the GFDL and UKMET coming in left of this guidance...
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
hicksta wrote:jkt21787 wrote:That's actually a good bit further south there at the end. What do you have to say, hicksta?
id have to say itl shift more north..
What a surprise, the model shifts south (although just a bit), but you insist it will go back north.
Sounds like a wish-caster to me.
0 likes
-
gkrangers
NOGAPS run is further north than 12Z run pretty much right off the start... *maybe* a touch south of the 18Z run... shows that the intermediate run was not an aberration... pretty significant as every 00/12 run of NOGAPS since Tuesday morning had been saying Yucatan with only slight north/south alterations...[/i]
Last edited by clfenwi on Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
That is what is so hard to predict about these storms, it is all in the timing. If everything doesnt synchornize as the meterologists expect it too it really begins a whole new ball game for them. I just hope that they can get a handle on Emily and where it is going soon so people in harms way can get prepared.
0 likes
mobilebay wrote:It appears so far that the models are seeing a weakness in the ridge around Jamaica to western Cuba. However once in the GOm high pressure seems to build back over Emily pushing her westwerd. All of this is subject to change though.
The question remains though at what latitude Emily makes it before turning west. That could determine a Texas or Mexico hit.
0 likes
- hicksta
- Category 5

- Posts: 1108
- Age: 35
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
- Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA
jkt21787 wrote:mobilebay wrote:It appears so far that the models are seeing a weakness in the ridge around Jamaica to western Cuba. However once in the GOm high pressure seems to build back over Emily pushing her westwerd. All of this is subject to change though.
The question remains though at what latitude Emily makes it before turning west. That could determine a Texas or Mexico hit.
i doubt a mexico. with it near cuba.. doubt it
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hurricane2000 and 73 guests

