18:00z Model Guidance,All Mexico

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148501
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

18:00z Model Guidance,All Mexico

#1 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:47 pm

NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER NORTH ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

HURRICANE EMILY (AL052005) ON 20050714 1800 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
050714 1800 050715 0600 050715 1800 050716 0600

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 13.0N 65.0W 14.0N 68.4W 15.1N 71.8W 16.3N 75.3W
BAMM 13.0N 65.0W 13.9N 69.0W 15.0N 72.9W 16.0N 76.8W
A98E 13.0N 65.0W 13.9N 68.6W 14.8N 71.9W 15.6N 75.1W
LBAR 13.0N 65.0W 14.0N 68.3W 15.3N 71.9W 16.6N 75.6W
SHIP 95KTS 103KTS 108KTS 110KTS
DSHP 95KTS 103KTS 108KTS 110KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
050716 1800 050717 1800 050718 1800 050719 1800

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 17.5N 78.7W 19.9N 84.9W 22.1N 89.8W 24.1N 93.8W
BAMM 17.1N 80.7W 19.3N 87.4W 20.6N 92.6W 21.5N 96.1W
A98E 16.5N 78.2W 18.5N 84.0W 20.3N 89.1W 22.3N 93.1W
LBAR 17.8N 79.2W 19.6N 86.3W 21.1N 91.7W .0N .0W
SHIP 113KTS 112KTS 105KTS 97KTS
DSHP 113KTS 112KTS 69KTS 61KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 13.0N LONCUR = 65.0W DIRCUR = 285DEG SPDCUR = 18KT
LATM12 = 12.0N LONM12 = 61.5W DIRM12 = 284DEG SPDM12 = 15KT
LATM24 = 11.3N LONM24 = 59.0W
WNDCUR = 95KT RMAXWD = 5NM WNDM12 = 80KT
CENPRS = 971MB OUTPRS = 1011MB OUTRAD = 175NM SDEPTH = D
RD34NE = 100NM RD34SE = 75NM RD34SW = 40NM RD34NW = 90NM


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8250
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#2 Postby jasons2k » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:50 pm

Thanks Cyclone.

It'll be interersting to see if they are still so tightly clustered once Emily gets to about 85W.
0 likes   

jax

#3 Postby jax » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:50 pm

only the UKMET and the GFDL are 1800hrs (1730hrs)
the others are yet to be updated...

edited for spelling
0 likes   

gkrangers

#4 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:51 pm

jax wrote:only the UKMET and the GDFL are 1800hrs (1730hrs)
the others are yet to be updated...
the UKMET and GFDL are actually the 12z model runs.
0 likes   

jax

#5 Postby jax » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:52 pm

gkrangers wrote:
jax wrote:only the UKMET and the GDFL are 1800hrs (1730hrs)
the others are yet to be updated...
the UKMET and GFDL are actually the 12z model runs.


i'm simply reading the times on the chart...
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#6 Postby dhweather » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:52 pm

Looks like it will be similar to Gilbert - "I'm not changing my path"
0 likes   

gkrangers

#7 Postby gkrangers » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:54 pm

jax wrote:
gkrangers wrote:
jax wrote:only the UKMET and the GDFL are 1800hrs (1730hrs)
the others are yet to be updated...
the UKMET and GFDL are actually the 12z model runs.


i'm simply reading the times on the chart...
Ok..but the UKMET and GFDL plots were put on the chart at 1730z..the data is from the 12z runs tho.

The hurricane model times are accurate..if its around 12z, its the 12z run. If its around 18z, its the 18z run, and so on.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#8 Postby Brent » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:54 pm

Brownsville is at 25.9 N 97.5 W for reference.

Tampico at 22.2 N 97.9 W
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148501
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#9 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:59 pm

They are now updated.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

jax

#10 Postby jax » Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:04 pm

NHCA983 and BAMD hint at extream south Texas...
Last edited by jax on Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#11 Postby Swimdude » Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:04 pm

dhweather wrote:Looks like it will be similar to Gilbert - "I'm not changing my path"


Yup; I agree. Then again, I wasn't around to track Gilbert... Or... I was... Maybe a few months old... Anyway, I do know Gilbert was a very "stick-to-it" storm in terms of path... This one could easily do the same. What happened to the talk of a turn NW or NNW after 120 HR?
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#12 Postby djtil » Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:18 pm

not only is this going to end up mexico, but deep mexico. i think the gfs and nogaps are closest on this one.
0 likes   

User avatar
CaptinCrunch
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8740
Age: 57
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:33 pm
Location: Kennedale, TX (Tarrant Co.)

#13 Postby CaptinCrunch » Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:20 pm

jschlitz wrote:Thanks Cyclone.

It'll be interersting to see if they are still so tightly clustered once Emily gets to about 85W.


I'll go a shift of 1.5 degrees N by 80W.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#14 Postby dhweather » Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:25 pm

Emily Se Espanol
0 likes   

jax

#15 Postby jax » Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:07 pm

notice how far north the XTRAP moved...
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#16 Postby dwg71 » Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:09 pm

Yeah the XTRAP model is good.

:lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
hicksta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1108
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:16 am
Location: Kemah Texas/ Baton Rogue LA

#17 Postby hicksta » Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:12 pm

it will change.
0 likes   

jax

#18 Postby jax » Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:13 pm

dwg71 wrote:Yeah the XTRAP model is good.

:lol:


it's not a model... it's a line that demostrates where the storm
would go on a strait line given it's current direction...
0 likes   

User avatar
Canelaw99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2128
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Homestead, FL

#19 Postby Canelaw99 » Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:13 pm

OK, I have to say it just to make sure - y'all do know the xtrap is just the extrapolation of the storm's current path (in other words, where it would go if it continued on it's exact, current path)...

Sorry - had read these posts a couple times and wanted to make sure. I didn't know that when I first came on the boards :)
0 likes   

LilNoles2005
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:32 am

eh...

#20 Postby LilNoles2005 » Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:17 pm

jax wrote:
dwg71 wrote:Yeah the XTRAP model is good.

:lol:


it's not a model... it's a line that demostrates where the storm
would go on a strait line given it's current direction...



I'm guessing you missed dwg71's sarcasm in his post.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 269 guests