July 14th 12z Global Models - Emily
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
gkrangers
July 14th 12z Global Models - Emily
The 12z UKMET appears fairly steady in its track, shifted slightly south near landfall. With a landfall in extreme upper Mexico. This after it passes just off the northern tip of the Yucatan.
12z NOGAPS has shfited its carribbean track some to the north, impacting Jamaica...then the central/northern Yucatan peninsula. Then W/WNW into the central part of the mexican gulf coastline.
The 12z GFS remains mainly unchanged. I think theres a slight northern shift in the Carribbean track as compared to 12 hours ago. Just south of Jamaica towards the central Yucatan, into the BOC, and WNW into the Mexican coast. Similar to the NOGAPS IMO.
12z NOGAPS has shfited its carribbean track some to the north, impacting Jamaica...then the central/northern Yucatan peninsula. Then W/WNW into the central part of the mexican gulf coastline.
The 12z GFS remains mainly unchanged. I think theres a slight northern shift in the Carribbean track as compared to 12 hours ago. Just south of Jamaica towards the central Yucatan, into the BOC, and WNW into the Mexican coast. Similar to the NOGAPS IMO.
Last edited by gkrangers on Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
jax
NOGAPS...slightly north of prev track starting at 48 h (but near identical to prev 12Z track)...timing virtually unchanged...mid-Yucatan landfall at 96 h...off-shore at 108 h...landfall ivo Tampico at 144 h...
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/CGI/PUBLIC/w ... 2005071412
GFS...this run decides to draw a closed isobar around Emily...similar track to previous run although slightly slower by day 3 or so... mid-Yucatan landfall b/t 78 and 84 h...then the creeping begins...slooowly across BOC...landfall ivo Tampico at 150h...
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
UKMET...slightly slower and further south than previous run... puts Jamaica in Emily's northeast quadrant during 48h-54h...across the tip of Yucatan at 84 h...moving northwest towards Rio Grande/S Texas in last frame displayed (108 h)...
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
Canadian...adjacent to Jamaican east coast at 36 h...west of Jamaica at 60 h...loses the low after that...inverted trough over Cuba at 72 hr... trough implies Rio Grand landfall at 96h...
http://weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/model_for ... bal_e.html
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/CGI/PUBLIC/w ... 2005071412
GFS...this run decides to draw a closed isobar around Emily...similar track to previous run although slightly slower by day 3 or so... mid-Yucatan landfall b/t 78 and 84 h...then the creeping begins...slooowly across BOC...landfall ivo Tampico at 150h...
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
UKMET...slightly slower and further south than previous run... puts Jamaica in Emily's northeast quadrant during 48h-54h...across the tip of Yucatan at 84 h...moving northwest towards Rio Grande/S Texas in last frame displayed (108 h)...
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
Canadian...adjacent to Jamaican east coast at 36 h...west of Jamaica at 60 h...loses the low after that...inverted trough over Cuba at 72 hr... trough implies Rio Grand landfall at 96h...
http://weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/model_for ... bal_e.html
0 likes
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
dwg71 wrote:There seems to be consensous amongst most all models that Mexico is the path of choice, once through Yuc and finally towards Tampico..
O.K. then everybody go back to work and lets quit wasting our time tracking Emily since the models have spoken. The storm is going into Mexico and no one in the U.S. has to worry.
0 likes
-
gkrangers
Those in South Texas should watch things...but its staying hot and dry in Houston, so don't worry.Stormcenter wrote:dwg71 wrote:There seems to be consensous amongst most all models that Mexico is the path of choice, once through Yuc and finally towards Tampico..
O.K. then everybody go back to work and lets quit wasting our time tracking Emily since the models have spoken. The storm is going into Mexico and no one in the U.S. has to worry.
0 likes
Stormcenter wrote:dwg71 wrote:There seems to be consensous amongst most all models that Mexico is the path of choice, once through Yuc and finally towards Tampico..
O.K. then everybody go back to work and lets quit wasting our time tracking Emily since the models have spoken. The storm is going into Mexico and no one in the U.S. has to worry.
No it doesnt mean that, what it does mean is that the models have a pretty good handle on Emily, (like dennis) and we did not see any big sways in the path. I would not expect a large sway one way or the other. Time will tell, but at least I didnt just post "its going to Mexico" and leave. I think that Mexico/extreme S TX is the most plausable track at the moment, as does the NHC...
0 likes
-
LilNoles2005
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:32 am
...
Stormcenter wrote:dwg71 wrote:There seems to be consensous amongst most all models that Mexico is the path of choice, once through Yuc and finally towards Tampico..
O.K. then everybody go back to work and lets quit wasting our time tracking Emily since the models have spoken. The storm is going into Mexico and no one in the U.S. has to worry.
0 likes
- Cape Verde
- Category 2

- Posts: 564
- Age: 70
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:53 pm
- Location: Houston area
I hope it's Mexico, but being certain about a hurricane's position more than 5 days out is a little ridiculous.<P>All I'm certain of is that if Emily gets into the Western Gulf, she will encounter even hotter water.<P>I'm tossing in ice cubes every evening, but I can't detect that it's making a difference yet.
0 likes
-
Rainband
They pretty much nailed DennisCape Verde wrote:I hope it's Mexico, but being certain about a hurricane's position more than 5 days out is a little ridiculous.<P>All I'm certain of is that if Emily gets into the Western Gulf, she will encounter even hotter water.<P>I'm tossing in ice cubes every evening, but I can't detect that it's making a difference yet.
0 likes
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38266
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Rainband wrote:They pretty much nailed DennisCape Verde wrote:I hope it's Mexico, but being certain about a hurricane's position more than 5 days out is a little ridiculous.<P>All I'm certain of is that if Emily gets into the Western Gulf, she will encounter even hotter water.<P>I'm tossing in ice cubes every evening, but I can't detect that it's making a difference yet.
The problem is... the NHC 5-day track doesn't even go to Mainland Mexico yet. Nothing says it can't make a turn and go into South Texas beyond that.
and just because they nailed Dennis(which was about the simpliest track to forecast I've ever seen, it went between two ridges, duh), doesn't mean we should think they will be precise with Emily. 5-day track errors are still 300 miles. With Cindy the initial prediction was Galveston and we see where they wound up.
0 likes
#neversummer
- wxwatcher91
- Category 5

- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Keene, NH
- Contact:
-
Rainband
yeah but the strength of the ridge wasn't that easy to predict and The models were all over with Dennis that was my point. The models have been very close together in this case. Like I said I trust the NHC.Brent wrote:Rainband wrote:They pretty much nailed DennisCape Verde wrote:I hope it's Mexico, but being certain about a hurricane's position more than 5 days out is a little ridiculous.<P>All I'm certain of is that if Emily gets into the Western Gulf, she will encounter even hotter water.<P>I'm tossing in ice cubes every evening, but I can't detect that it's making a difference yet.
The problem is... the NHC 5-day track doesn't even go to Mainland Mexico yet. Nothing says it can't make a turn and go into South Texas beyond that.
and just because they nailed Dennis(which was about the simpliest track to forecast I've ever seen, it went between two ridges, duh), doesn't mean we should think they will be precise with Emily. 5-day track errors are still 300 miles. With Cindy the initial prediction was Galveston and we see where they wound up.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: wwizard and 50 guests

