Emily Recon
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Gorky
- Category 1

- Posts: 334
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:23 am
- Location: Scarborough, North Yorkshire, UK
Edit: Posted wrong storm :>
Sorry clicked on wrong button and it gave me a recon result from Adrian
in my haste to post I only saw the name as I hit reply 
Sorry clicked on wrong button and it gave me a recon result from Adrian
Last edited by Gorky on Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
- johngaltfla
- Category 5

- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Sarasota County, FL
- Contact:
Gorky wrote:000
URPN12 KNHC 191854
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 19/18:30:20Z
B. 12 deg 28 min N
090 deg 34 min W
C. NA mb 1298 m
D. 80 kt
E. 090 deg 007 nm
F. 114 deg 071 kt
G. 35 deg 008 nm
H. EXTRAP 984 mb
I. 15 C/ 1528 m
J. 26 C/ 1517 m
K. 15 C/ NA
L. OPEN E
M. C25
N. 12345/08
O. 0.02 / 1 nm
P. AF302 0101E ADRIAN OB 16
MAX FL WIND 83 KT N QUAD 16:53:40 Z
SLP EXTRAP FROM 850 MB
HEAVY RAIN OUTBOUND NW QUAD
Thats a 12 mb pressure drop since the previous vortex![]()
![]()
12 mb!!!! Holy smokes!!!
I wonder if this means all those model runs are now waste paper....
0 likes
-
Scorpion
- Tommedic
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 10:57 pm
- Location: Cape Fear NC
- Contact:
Please read messages thoroughly
We all need to take a breath and be sure we are talking about right storm... Though looking at sat pic, would be surprised to see a drop if not that much at least a drop.
0 likes
Storm EMILY: Observed By AF #302
Storm #05 in Atlantic Ocean1
Maximum Flight Level Winds Were 79KT (90.8mph 146.3km/h) In N Quadrant At 01:08:00 Z
Estimated Max Surface Winds 71.1KT (81.8mph 131.7km/h) *
Date/Time of Recon Report: Invalid Date (Invalid Date)
Position of the center: 11° 41' N 060° 45' W (11.7°N 60.8°W)
Minimum Height Measured At Standard Level Of 850mb: 1379m (Normal: 1457)
Surface Winds Were: Not Estimated
Estimated Surface Winds Were Measured nm (0miles) From Center At Bearing °
Maximum Flight Level Winds Near Center Were 058KT (66.7mph 107.4km/h) From 206°
Maximum Flight Level Winds Were Measured 036nm (41.4 miles) From Center At Bearing 122°
Minimum pressure: 992mb (29.29in)
Eye Wall Characterization Not Reported
Eye Did Not Have A Definable Form or was not reported
Center Fix Established Using: Penetration Radar Wind Pressure Temperature
Center Fix Established At Level(s): 850mb
Navigational Accuracy Measured At 0.02nm
Meteorological Accuracy Measured At 2nm
* = Estimated Surface Winds are assumed 90% of Max Flight Level Winds
Storm #05 in Atlantic Ocean1
Maximum Flight Level Winds Were 79KT (90.8mph 146.3km/h) In N Quadrant At 01:08:00 Z
Estimated Max Surface Winds 71.1KT (81.8mph 131.7km/h) *
Date/Time of Recon Report: Invalid Date (Invalid Date)
Position of the center: 11° 41' N 060° 45' W (11.7°N 60.8°W)
Minimum Height Measured At Standard Level Of 850mb: 1379m (Normal: 1457)
Surface Winds Were: Not Estimated
Estimated Surface Winds Were Measured nm (0miles) From Center At Bearing °
Maximum Flight Level Winds Near Center Were 058KT (66.7mph 107.4km/h) From 206°
Maximum Flight Level Winds Were Measured 036nm (41.4 miles) From Center At Bearing 122°
Minimum pressure: 992mb (29.29in)
Eye Wall Characterization Not Reported
Eye Did Not Have A Definable Form or was not reported
Center Fix Established Using: Penetration Radar Wind Pressure Temperature
Center Fix Established At Level(s): 850mb
Navigational Accuracy Measured At 0.02nm
Meteorological Accuracy Measured At 2nm
* = Estimated Surface Winds are assumed 90% of Max Flight Level Winds
0 likes
Re: Please read messages thoroughly
Tommedic wrote:We all need to take a breath and be sure we are talking about right storm... Though looking at sat pic, would be surprised to see a drop if not that much at least a drop.
Yeah, we all got a little excited with that. Lets move on...
but, there definitely is a more pronounced intensification going on right now.
0 likes
- johngaltfla
- Category 5

- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Sarasota County, FL
- Contact:
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148501
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
That vortex in posts above was from Adrian.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148501
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Gorky wrote:Geez... I had that post up for like 60 secons before I was able to edit it. Sorry for the confusion guys... Just clicked on East Pac and it's still showing the Adrian vortex. Just so happens to have pretty similar wind speeds so I didn't spot my mistake right away..
That's ok no problem.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
-
ncweatherwizard
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
- Location: Ft. Collins, CO
Thunder44 wrote:clfenwi wrote:992 mb! And yes, that was an Emily ob!
The pressure a bit high for Cat 1 hurricane though.
Well, in general, that depends on the environment a storm is in. If pressures are high, then the storm could have high 990s-mb and be a hurricane. Also, Recon may not have found the lowest pressure yet.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hurricane2000 and 126 guests


