Emily finally pulling up?

#81 Postby **jlauderdal** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:30 pm

CaptinCrunch wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:http://sirocco.accuweather.com/adc_hurr_images/2005/ae/UHAE_2_640X480.GIF

Accuweather appears to have it heading for Brownsville.

joe b has it heading for new orleans

Joe Blow has every HC heading for NO LA, if it does happen I hope he is there and takes it right in the a$$!!!

now that isn't a very friendly texas attitude..lol.

texasheat · #82 Postby **texasheat** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:30 pm

NASTY

Derecho · #83 Postby **Derecho** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:30 pm

Note that on many occasions the JB and Accuweather forecasts don't match, in many cases the deviations are large.

#84 Postby **dhweather** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:30 pm

Normandy wrote:Emily doesnt have a CDO, the center isnt even in the center of the convection....its on the extreme NW edge..

I think she's dangerously close to having a CDO, what an explosion this afternoon!

Now if it persists........

Sanibel · #85 Postby **Sanibel** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:31 pm

The answer to the topic is "yes" Emily has pulled up.

That last burst put an end to any speculation of weakening.

I finally figured what was causing the linear wave look. The High above Emily is so strong that it compressed the structure. That is why it looks like the center is accelerating out in front. That isn't the center, it's the west side of the LLC zipping around because of its compressed elongation. The reason it is shooting out like that is because the storm is bursting stronger and the LLC band needs to get back around quickly.

It is starting to lift a little. Grenada should get a good taste...

texasheat · #86 Postby **texasheat** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:31 pm

we should expect the wnw to accur soon

Website · #87 Postby **FritzPaul** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:33 pm

Hey, don't wish that on my fair city! Joe B. that is....

texasheat · #88 Postby **texasheat** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:47 pm

its all about the ridge

#89 Postby **CaptinCrunch** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:47 pm

Emily may take the same track as Gilbert did in 88'

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1988gilbert.html

#90 Postby **deltadog03** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:49 pm

currently, i think she is headed a little north of WNW...maybe like 290 or so??

texasheat · #91 Postby **texasheat** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:50 pm

ahhh gilbert. what a BEAST

texasheat · #92 Postby **texasheat** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:52 pm

deltadog03 wrote:currently, i think she is headed a little north of WNW...maybe like 290 or so??

i cant really tell but she is sure fireing alot !

#93 Postby **jasons2k** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:52 pm

Joe B. DOES NOT have it going to New Orleans.

His latest post says it MAY be a US, specifically TX threat.

Another example of someone posting something innacurate and then next thing you know everyone says "Joe B said this".........grrrrrr.........

clfenwi · #94 Postby **clfenwi** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:53 pm

deltadog03 wrote:currently, i think she is headed a little north of WNW...maybe like 290 or so??

290 pretty much is west-northwest as 270 is due west and 315 is northwest

texasheat · #95 Postby **texasheat** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:53 pm

jschlitz wrote:Joe B. DOES NOT have it going to New Orleans.

His latest post says it MAY be a US, specifically TX threat.

Another example of someone posting something innacurate and then next thing you know everyone says "Joe B said this".........grrrrrr.........

where did you get this

#96 Postby **deltadog03** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:53 pm

jschlitz wrote:Joe B. DOES NOT have it going to New Orleans.

His latest post says it MAY be a US, specifically TX threat.

Another example of someone posting something innacurate and then next thing you know everyone says "Joe B said this".........grrrrrr.........

i was just about to say...he hasn't made a landfall prediction yet...he is not stupid....he knows its waaaaay too early

#97 Postby **jasons2k** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:54 pm

texasheat wrote:
jschlitz wrote:Joe B. DOES NOT have it going to New Orleans.

His latest post says it MAY be a US, specifically TX threat.

Another example of someone posting something innacurate and then next thing you know everyone says "Joe B said this".........grrrrrr.........

where did you get this

On the Accuweather Pro Site, his PM column here is a snippet: "There are things about Emily that have me worried it could hit the United States, specifically Texas, besides the modelling which is shifting further north."

texasheat · #98 Postby **texasheat** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:57 pm

Website ???

#99 Postby **jasons2k** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:01 pm

texasheat wrote:Website ???

It's the Accuweather Pro Site - it is a pay site. Here is the generic URL:

https://wwwl.accuweather.com/pro_login.php

#100 Postby **Portastorm** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:28 pm

yup, jschlitz is totally accurate. JB has said nothing about New Orleans ... at least as far as Emily is concerned.

Emily finally pulling up?

Joe B.

Re: Joe B.

Re: Joe B.

Re: Joe B.

Who is online