Emily finally pulling up?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
texasheat

#21 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:10 pm

i have no clue why. but i cant open those links fron the ssoda.. everything else works just not them
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4305
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

#22 Postby abajan » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:17 pm

HURAKAN wrote:..."this season is not responding to climatology." <---Historical phase expressed by Forecaster Franklin.

And he ought to know because he's one of them. In fact, he's next! :lol:
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#23 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:18 pm

Skywatch_NC wrote:Man, the UKMET really took off and left the pack behind!

Eric

completely agree. I am running a Global Tracks trial, and it plots many, many more models than wunderground or the other site (with the white background). Out of a couple of dozen 12z models, the only model NOT showing a Yucatan hit is the UKMET, I think its safe to ignore it.
0 likes   

texasheat

#24 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:19 pm

jkt21787 wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:Man, the UKMET really took off and left the pack behind!

Eric

completely agree. I am running a Global Tracks trial, and it plots many, many more models than wunderground or the other site (with the white background). Out of a couple of dozen 12z models, the only model NOT showing a Yucatan hit is the UKMET, I think its safe to ignore it.


thats 5 days away.. it could easily change. espically with it seeming like its finnaly pulling up
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#25 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:21 pm

texasheat wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:Man, the UKMET really took off and left the pack behind!

Eric

completely agree. I am running a Global Tracks trial, and it plots many, many more models than wunderground or the other site (with the white background). Out of a couple of dozen 12z models, the only model NOT showing a Yucatan hit is the UKMET, I think its safe to ignore it.


thats 5 days away.. it could easily change. espically with it seeming like its finnaly pulling up


I agree, it has to be watched, but seeing as how the UKMET was determined to destroy NOLA with Dennis until about 24 hours before landfall makes its solutions a little less believable at this time.
0 likes   

jax

#26 Postby jax » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:23 pm

texasheat wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:Man, the UKMET really took off and left the pack behind!

Eric

completely agree. I am running a Global Tracks trial, and it plots many, many more models than wunderground or the other site (with the white background). Out of a couple of dozen 12z models, the only model NOT showing a Yucatan hit is the UKMET, I think its safe to ignore it.


thats 5 days away.. it could easily change. espically with it seeming like its finnaly pulling up


easily change... I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say they will all
change multiple times in the days to come...
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

#27 Postby Agua » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:23 pm

jkt21787 wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:Man, the UKMET really took off and left the pack behind!

Eric

I am running a Global Tracks trial, and it plots many, many more models than wunderground or the other site (with the white background). Out of a couple of dozen 12z models, the only model NOT showing a Yucatan hit is the UKMET, I think its safe to ignore it.


Not a hijack attempt, but the GT7 release candidate 1 is outstanding.
0 likes   

texasheat

#28 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:23 pm

jax wrote:
texasheat wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:Man, the UKMET really took off and left the pack behind!

Eric

completely agree. I am running a Global Tracks trial, and it plots many, many more models than wunderground or the other site (with the white background). Out of a couple of dozen 12z models, the only model NOT showing a Yucatan hit is the UKMET, I think its safe to ignore it.


thats 5 days away.. it could easily change. espically with it seeming like its finnaly pulling up


easily change... I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say they will all
change multiple times in the days to come...


agreed
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#29 Postby dwg71 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:24 pm

Emily just caught the worlds largest fish

Look here....


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... IR4/20.jpg
Last edited by dwg71 on Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

texasheat

#30 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:25 pm

dwg71 wrote:Emily just caught the worlds largets fish

Look here....


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... IR4/20.jpg


LOL
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#31 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:27 pm

I also think the models will be a little more erratic in the next couple of days..
0 likes   

User avatar
Wpwxguy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 427
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:10 pm
Location: Southeast Louisiana
Contact:

#32 Postby Wpwxguy » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:31 pm

Took me a while, but now I see! LOL
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#33 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:31 pm

One thing for sure, that convection is really firing.
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#34 Postby Swimdude » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:36 pm

UKMET... Where are you going?! :lol:

Image
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#35 Postby dwg71 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:37 pm

UKMET is on crack...
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#36 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:37 pm

Swimdude wrote:UKMET... Where are you going?! :lol:

Image


I think Accuweather may have gotten their hands on the UKMET. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#37 Postby Swimdude » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:38 pm

dwg71 wrote:Emily just caught the worlds largest fish

Look here....


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... IR4/20.jpg



That's awesome! I see it!
0 likes   

texasheat

#38 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:39 pm

i expect these models to move northern more.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#39 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:40 pm

texasheat wrote:i expect these models to move northern more.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but whats your reasoning?
0 likes   

texasheat

#40 Postby texasheat » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:42 pm

when storms intesify they tend to move more on a northern track. correct me if im wrong thought.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hurricane2000 and 111 guests