00z Canadian shifts east with other Globals
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
00z Canadian shifts east with other Globals
Canadian poses a threat to S.Fl and the Keys. 00z GFS also shifts slightly to the east. 00z Nogaps also a bit further east. Al posing a greater threat to Florida and potentially bringing the system dangeroulsy close to the Keys and even S Fl. Obviously, recon data fed into the models this evening has set a potential trend....
http://weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/data/mode ... 20_100.gif
http://weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/data/mode ... 20_100.gif
0 likes
- dixiebreeze
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
- Location: crystal river, fla.
-
PurdueWx80
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
PurdueWx80 wrote:The Canadian GEM has been one of the right-most outliers all along - no shift east here yet from what I can see.
Yes, again this has been an outlier here for a while.
I'm sorry if I'm being mean, but people keep posting the models that show FL hits, and they are the models that are initilaizing poorly or just doing bad overall. Please read previous posts and understand this.
We need to see the more reliable models like the UKMET and the tropicals and the GFS make significant shifts to the east as well. I know GFS was east a bit, but it could be a bad run tonight as ALHurricane mentioned in another thread.
0 likes
- feederband
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Lakeland Fl
jkt21787 wrote:PurdueWx80 wrote:The Canadian GEM has been one of the right-most outliers all along - no shift east here yet from what I can see.
Yes, again this has been an outlier here for a while.
I'm sorry if I'm being mean, but people keep posting the models that show FL hits, and they are the models that are initilaizing poorly or just doing bad overall. Please read previous posts and understand this.
We need to see the more reliable models like the UKMET and the tropicals and the GFS make significant shifts to the east as well. I know GFS was east a bit, but it could be a bad run tonight as ALHurricane mentioned in another thread.
I kind of confused what causes a bad run..
0 likes
The Canadian has not shifted East. It has been in right field the the whole time. As for the NAM
. The rest of the guidance is pretty tightly clustered along the central Gulf Coast. Right where the NHC has their forecast. I think they are right on. Throw out that one bad run (12Z) of the GFS and it has stayed in the same general area.
0 likes
feederband wrote:jkt21787 wrote:PurdueWx80 wrote:The Canadian GEM has been one of the right-most outliers all along - no shift east here yet from what I can see.
Yes, again this has been an outlier here for a while.
I'm sorry if I'm being mean, but people keep posting the models that show FL hits, and they are the models that are initilaizing poorly or just doing bad overall. Please read previous posts and understand this.
We need to see the more reliable models like the UKMET and the tropicals and the GFS make significant shifts to the east as well. I know GFS was east a bit, but it could be a bad run tonight as ALHurricane mentioned in another thread.
I kind of confused what causes a bad run..
In the case of the GFS, it does bad in the first 48 hours with too far N and E, it s obvious it will not take that path. Its also too fast.
NAM and CMC are initializing the system WAAAAAY too weak (~1000mb area). That will automatically want to take the system further east.
Look at this...Dennis track has been consistently going south of recent GFS models...

0 likes
The Canadian on a routine basis has a hilariously bad right bias for TCs.
It's the worst-performing global model in objective verification stats for a reason; it's often off by its lonesome as an outlier.
Also makes it the model of choice, for example, for Northeastern US people I disagree with; it showed Isabel hitting Long Island when every other model was tightly clustered on a North Carolina hit.
It's the worst-performing global model in objective verification stats for a reason; it's often off by its lonesome as an outlier.
Also makes it the model of choice, for example, for Northeastern US people I disagree with; it showed Isabel hitting Long Island when every other model was tightly clustered on a North Carolina hit.
0 likes
Also, how can storm rapidly strengthen over Central Fl.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/cmctc2.cgi?time=2005070700&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/cmctc2.cgi?time=2005070700&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation
0 likes
Actually, Canadian shifted a touch west
Compare http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cyclonephase/cmc ... 12/11.html
and
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cyclonephase/cmc ... 700/9.html
Compare http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cyclonephase/cmc ... 12/11.html
and
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cyclonephase/cmc ... 700/9.html
0 likes
-
WeatherEmperor
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 4806
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
- Location: South Florida
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: wwizard and 623 guests




