GFS shows Mobile Bay/MS border

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

GFS shows Mobile Bay/MS border

#1 Postby hurricanetrack » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:17 pm

I hope I am not repeating another post- but the 0z GFS now shows Mobile Bay area (or even MS/AL border) for a landfall- quite a jog back to the east like Pasch alluded to earlier today. We're also within 5 days of landfall, so these runs are getting to be more and more important.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_096m.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
ALhurricane
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Daphne, AL

#2 Postby ALhurricane » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:20 pm

Major problem with the 00z GFS..

way too far north and east in the first 48 hours. if you believe this is going to be over southern cuba like the GFS is showing then you have my sympathies :D

once again...if the model cannot figure out the short term right how can it get the later forecast hours right?
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#3 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:21 pm

FWIW (it may not be much), Canadian is coming back with a Mobile landfall as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
Houstonia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 829
Age: 61
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 9:45 am
Location: Sharpstown, Houston, Harris County, Southeast Texas.

dauphin island

#4 Postby Houstonia » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:21 pm

DI can't do with another major hurricane. They only had about 6 months to recover from last season and they got hit right away with Cindy.
0 likes   

User avatar
AL Chili Pepper
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

#5 Postby AL Chili Pepper » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:22 pm

jkt21787 wrote:FWIW (it may not be much), Canadian is coming back with a Mobile landfall as well.


You got a link? That would be a major change from the 12Z.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#6 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:25 pm

AL Chili Pepper wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:FWIW (it may not be much), Canadian is coming back with a Mobile landfall as well.


You got a link? That would be a major change from the 12Z.

Sorry, Looking at the wrong data.

Canadian still shows FL.

In fact it appears to show a Miami hit!
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

#7 Postby dixiebreeze » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:28 pm

They may all start trending more east after tonight. There's a big push swooping down to the GOM from WNW.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#8 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:29 pm

As ALhurricane said, GFS is not doing well in the short term. We know CMC/Canadian is bad. NAM is bad as well. All of those show the FL landfalls.

The others are showing NO-Mobile landfalls. That's where I'm going right now.

Edit: GFS is NOT showing a FL Landfall. Its showing Mobile as well.
Last edited by jkt21787 on Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#9 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:30 pm

Just keep it away from Houston. We need the rain but NOT that bad.
0 likes   

User avatar
AL Chili Pepper
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

#10 Postby AL Chili Pepper » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:38 pm

I agree AL, it's looking more and more like Dennis may even go south of Jamaica. I don't see much of a northerly component right now, at least not enough to have it hugging the southern coast of Cuba.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#11 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:47 pm

Wouldn't it be something if never made the NW turn?
0 likes   

gkrangers

#12 Postby gkrangers » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:49 pm

We gave the GFS too much credit today..it screwed the pooch on this run.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#13 Postby jkt21787 » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:51 pm

Image
Dennis has been consistently going south of recent GFS runs...this could have big implications...
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#14 Postby mobilebay » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:52 pm

ALhurricane wrote:Major problem with the 00z GFS..

way too far north and east in the first 48 hours. if you believe this is going to be over southern cuba like the GFS is showing then you have my sympathies :D

once again...if the model cannot figure out the short term right how can it get the later forecast hours right?

I'm not a Pro-Met and don't claim to be. However, how bad of a run could it be? It is in tightly clustered with other models NOGAPS,UKMET,GFDL, and the NHC projected path. The GFS has been showing this area for days. It had one bad run at 12Z and shifted back East, just like the NHC said it would in their 5PM Discussion. :D
0 likes   

mtm4319
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:47 am
Location: Mobile, AL

#15 Postby mtm4319 » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:56 pm

Does anyone know of a static map that shows computer models (like the one on Weather Underground here) but doesn't use the Mercator projection?

Image

I like this one, but I think it moves depending on the storm's location. (I'm trying to make a Google Earth image overlay that will work for most storms.)[/url]
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#16 Postby mobilebay » Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:01 am

also the 00Z UKMET stays exacty the Same= New orleans! I will post the Link in a minute.


http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
Last edited by mobilebay on Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#17 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:02 am

mobilebay wrote:also the 00Z UKMET stays exacty the Same= New orleans!

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/CGI/PUBLIC/w ... rp&tau=096

UKMET has been and continues to remain my favored model, for its consistency in this similar track.
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#18 Postby rtd2 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:04 am

mobilebay wrote:
ALhurricane wrote:Major problem with the 00z GFS..

way too far north and east in the first 48 hours. if you believe this is going to be over southern cuba like the GFS is showing then you have my sympathies :D

once again...if the model cannot figure out the short term right how can it get the later forecast hours right?

I'm not a Pro-Met and don't claim to be. However, how bad of a run could it be? It is in tightly clustered with other models NOGAPS,UKMET,GFDL, and the NHC projected path. The GFS has been showing this area for days. It had one bad run at 12Z and shifted back East, just like the NHC said it would in their 5PM Discussion. :D


Its NOT a BAD run...It may have Missed the Initial Position slightly but It still Clustered with all the others!
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#19 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:05 am

rtd2 wrote:
mobilebay wrote:
ALhurricane wrote:Major problem with the 00z GFS..

way too far north and east in the first 48 hours. if you believe this is going to be over southern cuba like the GFS is showing then you have my sympathies :D

once again...if the model cannot figure out the short term right how can it get the later forecast hours right?

I'm not a Pro-Met and don't claim to be. However, how bad of a run could it be? It is in tightly clustered with other models NOGAPS,UKMET,GFDL, and the NHC projected path. The GFS has been showing this area for days. It had one bad run at 12Z and shifted back East, just like the NHC said it would in their 5PM Discussion. :D


Its NOT a BAD run...It may have Missed the Initial Position slightly but It still Clustered with all the others!

No, its not nearly as bad as CMC and NAM. However, its missed position and too far N and E could mean its Mobile landfall is a bit east than it should be. Its best to wait for additional runs of course to latch on to the meaning here.
0 likes   

User avatar
mobilebay
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1853
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:22 am
Location: Mobile, Alabama

#20 Postby mobilebay » Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:06 am

NOW!! here is the 00Z UKMET= New orleans. Sorry about the Above. :roll:

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation

The point I've been trying to make is there is a pretty tight cluster of models that calls for landfall between New Orleans and Pensacola. These models include The GFS, UKMET, GFDL, NOGAPS, and the NHC model suite. Note- the NHC model suite will probably shift a little East on the next run because of the GFS.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: KirbyDude25 and 509 guests