FSU headed to play Key West?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5

- Posts: 4430
- Age: 44
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
FSU headed to play Key West?
0 likes
-
nolecaster
- Tropical Depression

- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:15 pm
- Location: Tallahassee
- Contact:
Tallygrl wrote:That's not the fsu superensemble-- its the mm5 -- the fsu superensemblemodel is not avalible to the public.....although they give it to the NHC
He didn't claim it to be, there are many enseble forecast models out there. Fsu outputs a few that are only ensemble copmilations, heck, event the gfs technically is an ensemble of all its model runs.
-Eric
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5

- Posts: 4430
- Age: 44
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
-
wxcrazytwo
-
Dean4Storms
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5

- Posts: 4430
- Age: 44
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
-
lurkerinthemidst
- Tropical Depression

- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:07 pm
- Location: Hudson,FL & Cleveland, TN
-
Derek Ortt
for one, the only MM5 that nailed Cindy was the UM version. It correctly insisted upon no well-defined center until it reached the NGOM. Even as all other models indicated landfall in Texas initially, UM MM5 correctly indicated a landfall new New Orleans with significant intensification near the coast. FSU was in the Texas bandwagon
0 likes
-
Rainband
- Canelaw99
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2128
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
- Location: Homestead, FL
Derek Ortt wrote:for one, the only MM5 that nailed Cindy was the UM version. It correctly insisted upon no well-defined center until it reached the NGOM. Even as all other models indicated landfall in Texas initially, UM MM5 correctly indicated a landfall new New Orleans with significant intensification near the coast. FSU was in the Texas bandwagon
Well, that's because we all know UM is better than FSU
0 likes
- Canelaw99
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2128
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
- Location: Homestead, FL
Rainband wrote:seems like the models last year had a right basis this year a left basis from what I have been reading. What cause this and what can be done in the future to help them become more accurate??
Maybe they overcorrected this year because of last year? Not sure how the models work, but there was quite a right bias, so it makes sense if the programs can be tweaked, that they had to tweak it to go more left, hence the left bias this year.....???
0 likes
- Wthrman13
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 502
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
- Location: West Lafayette, IN
- Contact:
ericinmia wrote:Tallygrl wrote:That's not the fsu superensemble-- its the mm5 -- the fsu superensemblemodel is not avalible to the public.....although they give it to the NHC
He didn't claim it to be, there are many enseble forecast models out there. Fsu outputs a few that are only ensemble copmilations, heck, event the gfs technically is an ensemble of all its model runs.
-Eric
I replied to this in another thread. The operational GFS is NOT an ensemble compilation or average. They run a separate GFS ensemble system at NCEP that uses perturbed initial conditions. The GFS model output you see is from the deterministic (single run) operational GFS.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: wwizard and 523 guests


