simplyme wrote:
If there's such a trend going on that includes years/decades, show it... talk about it. Discuss how this season or the weather in recent years is similar to how it was during the previous trend. Are the same factors in place? Will factors be similar in a month or two?
Excuse me friend, but thats ALL I've been doing the past 5+ years online: WARNING south Floridians that it was only a matter of time until the major hurricane cycle swung back to them.
Well friend, it finally happened in 2004. Two major landfalling hurricanes (Charley, Jeanne) plus another very strong (960 mb) cat-2 in Frances. If you believe that was just a "freak" year that will revert back to another long "dry spell" for south Florida, you are only kidding yourself.
There ARE major hurricane landfall cycles which have been extensively researched by hurricane experts. Go to Unisys and check out where 90%+ of landfalling major hurricanes struck the U.S. in the 1951-1960 period....between south Carolina and New England. Here's the number of intense hurricanes (IH) which made landfall between 1951-1960...landfalling hurricanes with central pressure below 965 mb/ 28.50".
1951-1960
U.S. east coast: 8 IH (incl Donna from SW Fla)
Florida peninsula: 1 IH (Donna)
U.S. Gulf coast: 1 IH (Audrey, an unseasonable June monster)
Now check out the 1961 to 1983 period..when the major hurricane cycle most definitely shifted to the Gulf Coast states. Monster hurricanes such as Camille, Frederic, Carla, and Betsy became legendary...and virtually every intense hurricane to impact America slammed the Gulf Coast during that 22 yr period....while none struck the U.S. east coast north of Florida, and only one struck south Florida (Betsy).
1961-1983
U.S. east coast: 0
Florida peninsula: 1 (Betsy)
U.S. Gulf coast: 11 (incl Betsy from SoFla)
The intense landfall hurricane cycle swung back to the U.S. east coast beginning with Diana in 1984. For the 1984-2003 period, intense hurricanes smashed the Carolinas particularly hard, but once again inexplably bypassed south Florida.
1984-2003
U.S. east coast: 9
Florida peninsula: 1 (Andrew)
U.S. gulf coast: 5 (incl Andrew from SoFla)
Now compare the periods since 1951 to the period between 1919 and 1950...the LAST intense landfalling hurricane cycle to target the Florida peninsula:
1919-1950
U.S. east coast: 3
Florida peninsula: 16 (incl 5 cat-4's and 1 cat-5)
U.S. gulf coast: 11 (incl 4 from SoFla)
In 2004, more intense hurricanes (3) targeted the southern half of Florida than during the entire 1961-2003 period....a 43 yr period of record. If anyone wants to believe last season was "just an anomaly"; "just a freak that won't happen again for decades", then be my guest....but you are only fooling yourself and IMHO are in for one helluva rude awakening in the next several years.
South Florida is climatologically and historically the most likely area of America to experience a landfalling intense hurricane. The unprecidated lull between 1951 and 2003 fooled millions; gave many a "false sense of security" that hurricane patterns had changed since the 1919-1950 period; that Miami, Tampa, and Palm Beach were somehow "protected" from big hurricanes. I even saw clueless theories that NOAA, the U.S. military, or even NASA had "steered" the big hurricanes away from south Florida since Andrew's carnage. Well, 2004 should have proven that the only reason monster hurricane Floyd turned away from the Sunshine state in 1999 was the same reason big canes sometimes turned away from the Sunshine state in 1900...GOOD FORTUNE aka DUMB LUCK.
Hurricane Georges in 1998 failed to deepen explosively before impacting south Florida after hitting Hispanola's 10,000' foot mountains just as David did in 1979 and the monster Santo Domingo hurricane did in 1930.....it wasn't peanut oil poured into the sea, nor dry ice, nor laser beams, nor the U.S. marines which saved Florida's hiney from Georges becoming a monster....just good fortune.
Based on last years hurricanes, IMO we have entered another Florida major landfall cycle. With history and climatology as a guide, it means we can reasonably expect, on average a major landfalling hurricane somewhere in south or central Florida once per 2 years for the foreseeable future (30 yrs or so). As difficult as it may seem to believe, Floridians was actually quite fortunate in 2004.
Charley was exceedingly small and missed large population centers along the SW Florida coast; Frances weakened from 140 mph to 105-110 mph over the Bahamas AND missed the densely populated SE Florida coast; so did Jeanne, even though billions in damage occurred along her path.
If history is a guide, we won't be so fortunate in coming years....because it's almost inevitable at least 4 or 5 of the powerful hurricanes during this next cycle won't be small, won't weaken before landfall, or won't miss the large population centers.
They may not be called "the great Miami hurricane", "San Felipe", "the Labor Day hurricane", or the "great Sept 1947 Florida hurricane".....but their catastrophic impact on Florida will be the same; possibly even worse (there are a lot more people and expensive property in harms way today than in 1926 or 1947).
To put those past monster hurricanes into perspective, the 1926 Miami hurricane was very similar to 1989's Hugo.....the 1928 San Felipe and 1919 Keys monster hurricane similar to 1999's Floyd a his peak. The 1947 Fort Lauderdale cat-4 similar to 1995's Luis...of course, for intensity the 1935 Labor Day hurricane was off the scale; think about last season's Charley or 1992's Andrew with 195-200 mph SUSTAINED winds (gusting to 230+ mph/ 200 kts
Now imagine ALL of those monster hurricanes slamming the Florida peninsula within the next 30 years....it already happened between 1919 and 1950 (during the LAST intense Florida landfall cycle), so there's no reason similar monsters couldn't impact Florida again during the next two to three decade period.
PW