http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0% ... %2C00.html
I had no idea this storm may have caused a wave that large. Specifically, the NRL model predicts it may have reached 131 feet in height
Moderator: S2k Moderators


PTrackerLA wrote:I've seen damage from the Pensacola beach area that looks as if waves were crashing on the tops of some 2 story ocean front condos because they all had similar damage...just the front parts of the roofs had caved in..



CFL wrote:I'm still amazed when I drive down Scenic Highway and see that entire bottom floors washed away. These condos and townhouses aren't on the Gulf. . . they are on the Escambia Bay!


SunnyThoughts wrote:Thats just terrifying. I do know that the local authorities believe that a large wave caused the I10 bridge to give way..I suppose it wasn't nearly as high as this...but to think about a wave that high...is almost incomprehensible.


SunnyThoughts wrote:I came across this right after the storm...not so sure how TRUE it is...but worth the look anyway.
http://www.big-boys.com/articles/hurricaneivan.html

mf_dolphin wrote:We have to remember the the waves are on top of the storm surge. So if you have an 8 foot surge and a 12 ft wave that's 20 feet from sealevel.
Aslkahuna wrote:An open water storm wave is way different from a tsunami and a 100 foot storm wave would have tripped and broken long before reaching shore. From the report, it looks like this was a rogue wave resulting from interference between conflicting wave/swell trains and currents.
Steve
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 615 guests