92L Up at NRL....No Pix Yet

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Post Reply
Message
Author
Steve H.
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2163
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

92L Up at NRL....No Pix Yet

#1 Postby Steve H. » Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:00 pm

I'm out of town but saw a 92L up on the Naval site. Is this old or for the spin in the carribbean? No photos yet :?:
0 likes   
Top
Matt-hurricanewatcher

#2 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:01 pm

Its true

http://tcweb.fnmoc.navy.mil/tc-bin/tc_home.cgi


In its up here to.

http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
air360
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 447
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Morehead City, NC
Contact:
Contact air360

#3 Postby air360 » Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:03 pm

yep...92L....its our storm...

Image
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:
Contact senorpepr

#4 Postby senorpepr » Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:05 pm

Hmmm... this still shouldn't be 92L. Arlene was 90L and 91L was only up for a short amount of time due to an error. This storm should be listed as 91L.


(okay, in reality, Arlene should have been 91L. Maybe they're catching up with the numbering convention....)
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#5 Postby Thunder44 » Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:07 pm

This means 91L was for real the other. They got concerned about that little swirl out in the Atlantic for awhile.
0 likes   
Top
cyclonaut

#6 Postby cyclonaut » Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:09 pm

The ULL to the north is gradually weakening.

Its going to be another slow process.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:
Contact senorpepr

#7 Postby senorpepr » Mon Jun 13, 2005 5:10 pm

Thunder44 wrote:This means 91L was for real the other. They got concerned about that little swirl out in the Atlantic for awhile.


No, that shouldn't be the case. The wouldn't (or shouldn't) list an invest for only a couple of hours. That makes the idea of an invest moot -- to run models with an ID number.

I believe they are just trying to catch up because Arlene should have been 91L. There was already an 90L in May.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:
Contact dhweather

#8 Postby dhweather » Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:00 pm

cyclonaut wrote:The ULL to the north is gradually weakening.

Its going to be another slow process.


The latest WV loop seems to indicate that the ULL has started to weaken.
0 likes   
Top
Matt-hurricanewatcher

#9 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Jun 13, 2005 6:06 pm

The ULL might be weaken a little. But reinforcement are coming off the coast. With 50 knots of shear.
0 likes   
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 603 guests