18z Gfs on potential new system this week

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

18z Gfs on potential new system this week

#1 Postby Vortex » Sat Jun 11, 2005 5:43 pm

Several models continue to indicate potential development this upcoming week near Jamaica. Here's a look at the 18z gfs at H-72

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_072l.gif
0 likes   

Anonymous

#2 Postby Anonymous » Sat Jun 11, 2005 5:49 pm

Is the system south of cuba in this map or se of bermuda??
0 likes   

Coredesat

#3 Postby Coredesat » Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:04 pm

South of Cuba. It's the one closest to Jamaica, the 1008mb low.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7240
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: 18z Gfs on potential new system this week

#4 Postby jlauderdal » Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:36 pm

Vortex wrote:Several models continue to indicate potential development this upcoming week near Jamaica. Here's a look at the 18z gfs at H-72

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_072l.gif


many of us make fun of gfs outside 72h including me but after arlene we better be careful. climatology suggests another named stormed by the end of june is highly unlikely.
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

#5 Postby canegrl04 » Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:19 pm

Climatalogy may suggest another June storm is unlikely, but this season,I think it is a good possibility. Arlene came 12 days before the average June storm starts :eek:
0 likes   

Josephine96

#6 Postby Josephine96 » Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:22 pm

Arlene and Bret before July 1..? I think that would be a storm trackers' dream lol
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#7 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sat Jun 11, 2005 7:23 pm

I would need more runs. In would also need other models to join in before I start hyping this to much.
0 likes   

SouthernWx

Re: 18z Gfs on potential new system this week

#8 Postby SouthernWx » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:05 pm

jlauderdal wrote:many of us make fun of gfs outside 72h including me but after arlene we better be careful. climatology suggests another named stormed by the end of june is highly unlikely.


I'd normally agree with you, but in a hurricane season which seems so primed (near record sst's), we may see some things occur that aren't climatological...

FYI...if folks want to see how wild the beginning to hurricane season can be, check out 1886....a year in which three hurricanes developed and struck the Gulf coast during June...all three 85 kt cat-2's.
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... index.html

PW
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#9 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:08 pm

Southernwx what is your thinking on this?
0 likes   

BocaGirl66

#10 Postby BocaGirl66 » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:18 pm

i think this systems may develop but i have to look over this for the next few days


Junior @ West Boca Raton High School!
Last edited by BocaGirl66 on Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#11 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:22 pm

should be repeated that an active june does not mean an active season. IN fact, the odds favor a QUIET season if June is active (see the paper by Dr Gray)
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#12 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:31 pm

There appears to be a area of deep convection. Which looks some what interesting at 12 north/75 west. I know that the heat low over south America will kill its chances.
0 likes   

SouthernWx

#13 Postby SouthernWx » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:46 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Southernwx what is your thinking on this?


The same thing I posted on my site this evening....it's "watch and wait" time again. It definitely bears watching....especially in a year with Caribbean Sea & deep tropical Atlantic sst's above average.

PW
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: 18z Gfs on potential new system this week

#14 Postby Brent » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:49 pm

SouthernWx wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:many of us make fun of gfs outside 72h including me but after arlene we better be careful. climatology suggests another named stormed by the end of june is highly unlikely.


I'd normally agree with you, but in a hurricane season which seems so primed (near record sst's), we may see some things occur that aren't climatological...

FYI...if folks want to see how wild the beginning to hurricane season can be, check out 1886....a year in which three hurricanes developed and struck the Gulf coast during June...all three 85 kt cat-2's.
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... index.html

PW


2 and 3 hit the same spot!!! :eek:
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#15 Postby Andrew92 » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:51 pm

Still, for those who say a "B" storm in June usually might mean, in terms of the odds, a quiet season, go back to 2003....

We had Ana in April, and Bill in late June. That year was crazy enough.

1933 also had a May storm, and then another June storm, and we know what that season produced.

-Andrew92
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#16 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:02 pm

1993 produced a very inactive season. A whopping 4 hurricanes and one major for just 12 hours. (The may "storm" was a depression)

The April storm does not count for 2003 as that was well out of season; thus, a statistical anomaly.

some seasons are active with an active early season, but the reviewed paper has documented the megative correlation (about -.3 to -.4)
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#17 Postby Andrew92 » Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:04 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:1993 produced a very inactive season. A whopping 4 hurricanes and one major for just 12 hours. (The may "storm" was a depression)

The April storm does not count for 2003 as that was well out of season; thus, a statistical anomaly.

some seasons are active with an active early season, but the reviewed paper has documented the megative correlation (about -.3 to -.4)


I think you mis-read my post. I said 1933, not 1993. :wink:

-Andrew92
0 likes   

cyclonaut

#18 Postby cyclonaut » Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:08 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:should be repeated that an active june does not mean an active season. IN fact, the odds favor a QUIET season if June is active (see the paper by Dr Gray)

Maybe so but this seasons forecast is not suppose to be quiet..There have been seasons such 1886,1887,1893.1906,1933 & 1995 that produced early development & that remained consistent through the rest of the season..

So since the forecast is for an active season it looks like the season might be off to the races.
Last edited by cyclonaut on Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
air360
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 447
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Morehead City, NC
Contact:

#19 Postby air360 » Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:08 pm

hehe...i suppose derek is tired after the past few days eh :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#20 Postby Andrew92 » Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:09 pm

air360 wrote:hehe...i suppose derek is tired after the past few days eh :)


You're right, I should cut him some slack, especially since 1933 and 1993 look similar.....but the seasons were far from.

Imagine how tired we'd be if we had a 1933-like season! 21 TS's, 10 hurricanes.....I think I'd be exhausted just looking at satellite images casually! :eek:

-Andrew92
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 653 guests