18z Gfs on potential new system this week
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
18z Gfs on potential new system this week
Several models continue to indicate potential development this upcoming week near Jamaica. Here's a look at the 18z gfs at H-72
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_072l.gif
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_072l.gif
0 likes
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: 18z Gfs on potential new system this week
Vortex wrote:Several models continue to indicate potential development this upcoming week near Jamaica. Here's a look at the 18z gfs at H-72
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_072l.gif
many of us make fun of gfs outside 72h including me but after arlene we better be careful. climatology suggests another named stormed by the end of june is highly unlikely.
0 likes
-
Josephine96
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
-
SouthernWx
Re: 18z Gfs on potential new system this week
jlauderdal wrote:many of us make fun of gfs outside 72h including me but after arlene we better be careful. climatology suggests another named stormed by the end of june is highly unlikely.
I'd normally agree with you, but in a hurricane season which seems so primed (near record sst's), we may see some things occur that aren't climatological...
FYI...if folks want to see how wild the beginning to hurricane season can be, check out 1886....a year in which three hurricanes developed and struck the Gulf coast during June...all three 85 kt cat-2's.
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... index.html
PW
0 likes
-
BocaGirl66
-
Derek Ortt
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
-
SouthernWx
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38266
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: 18z Gfs on potential new system this week
SouthernWx wrote:jlauderdal wrote:many of us make fun of gfs outside 72h including me but after arlene we better be careful. climatology suggests another named stormed by the end of june is highly unlikely.
I'd normally agree with you, but in a hurricane season which seems so primed (near record sst's), we may see some things occur that aren't climatological...
FYI...if folks want to see how wild the beginning to hurricane season can be, check out 1886....a year in which three hurricanes developed and struck the Gulf coast during June...all three 85 kt cat-2's.
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... index.html
PW
2 and 3 hit the same spot!!!
0 likes
#neversummer
- Andrew92
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 3247
- Age: 41
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Still, for those who say a "B" storm in June usually might mean, in terms of the odds, a quiet season, go back to 2003....
We had Ana in April, and Bill in late June. That year was crazy enough.
1933 also had a May storm, and then another June storm, and we know what that season produced.
-Andrew92
We had Ana in April, and Bill in late June. That year was crazy enough.
1933 also had a May storm, and then another June storm, and we know what that season produced.
-Andrew92
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
1993 produced a very inactive season. A whopping 4 hurricanes and one major for just 12 hours. (The may "storm" was a depression)
The April storm does not count for 2003 as that was well out of season; thus, a statistical anomaly.
some seasons are active with an active early season, but the reviewed paper has documented the megative correlation (about -.3 to -.4)
The April storm does not count for 2003 as that was well out of season; thus, a statistical anomaly.
some seasons are active with an active early season, but the reviewed paper has documented the megative correlation (about -.3 to -.4)
0 likes
- Andrew92
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 3247
- Age: 41
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Derek Ortt wrote:1993 produced a very inactive season. A whopping 4 hurricanes and one major for just 12 hours. (The may "storm" was a depression)
The April storm does not count for 2003 as that was well out of season; thus, a statistical anomaly.
some seasons are active with an active early season, but the reviewed paper has documented the megative correlation (about -.3 to -.4)
I think you mis-read my post. I said 1933, not 1993.
-Andrew92
0 likes
-
cyclonaut
Derek Ortt wrote:should be repeated that an active june does not mean an active season. IN fact, the odds favor a QUIET season if June is active (see the paper by Dr Gray)
Maybe so but this seasons forecast is not suppose to be quiet..There have been seasons such 1886,1887,1893.1906,1933 & 1995 that produced early development & that remained consistent through the rest of the season..
So since the forecast is for an active season it looks like the season might be off to the races.
Last edited by cyclonaut on Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- Andrew92
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 3247
- Age: 41
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
air360 wrote:hehe...i suppose derek is tired after the past few days eh
You're right, I should cut him some slack, especially since 1933 and 1993 look similar.....but the seasons were far from.
Imagine how tired we'd be if we had a 1933-like season! 21 TS's, 10 hurricanes.....I think I'd be exhausted just looking at satellite images casually!
-Andrew92
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 628 guests



