You want some facts?

14 Apr 2005/12Z QSCAT data indicated an elongated area of low pressure, but no southeasterly winds.

Surface observations and ship reports indicated a lack of southeasterly winds.

Upper-air analysis indicated a deep trough with an cut-off upper-level low.

Surface observations and ship reports indicated a drop in temperatures of 5-20°F behind the front. Standard surface analysis steps would conclude that a cold, warm, and occluded front are present.

Upper-air analysis indicated deep cold-air advection funneling to the system’s southwestern quadrant.

Satellite analysis and meteorological theories applied to this system indicated that the limited semi-deep convection associated with the system was nothing more than an interaction between the air aloft to the sea surface temperature with some vertical velocities and vorticity advection thrown in the mix.
I’ll stop right there…
There was no need for recon to investigate an extratropical system.
As for “playing the darn Nhc card,” how about stop playing the darn notsogreatone card. Why would I tend to believe a seasoned meteorologist with decades of experience and a master’s degree or Ph.D over a teenage weather hobbyist? Because that makes since! Trust me; these folks have been watching these storms before you were even an idea in your parents’ mind. Furthermore, the experienced meteorologist here on S2K, including myself, have been monitoring these systems for years before you did. Many of these same mets, including myself, have professional backgrounds in meteorology that help support our theories and we have college backgrounds to help support our theories.
This was an occluded low. I don’t know if there is any other way to tell you because you obviously don’t care about the opinions of those who are knowledgeable in this field. Rather, you would care to live in your dream world full of subtropical systems and South Atlantic cyclones.
If you’re tempted so badly to tell me something, feel free to PM me. I’d love to hear what you have to say. See, Matt, I do value your opinion. Believe it or not, I do. However, when you contradict many people with tons more experience than you do and you provide no support of your opinion, your credibility goes down the tube. Trust me, I don’t want to squelch your ideas, but you also have to learn to accept the knowledge and the advice of others.
I don’t mean this as a slam to you or your intelligence. However, I take offense when someone slams my or my peers’ intelligence, which is what you’re doing. People continue to provide you evidence on why systems are extratropical or won’t develop, but you choose to disregard them and continue on your “random cyclonic development hooting and hollering.” I just ask that you give those professionals the credit they deserve instead of playing “Monday morning quarterback.”
We’re all here to learn and share ideas. That only works when one is willing to accept those ideas and provide reason behind their own. Otherwise, we have the Iraqi Information Minister on our hands.
Now, as I said before, feel free to PM me. I want to hear your ideas and your vents. Also, I want you to know I do enjoy viewing your posts because you do have an eye for monitoring potential systems. You normally spot something questionable well before other people do. That should be commended, but please… please try to accept the advice that is being dispensed your way.