Check this NOAA QuikScat.....

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Check this NOAA QuikScat.....

#1 Postby dixiebreeze » Wed May 18, 2005 1:59 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
jabber
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC (former Boynton Beach, Fl)

#2 Postby jabber » Wed May 18, 2005 3:06 pm

Not the best of have seen... but I will take what I can at this point :)
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

#3 Postby soonertwister » Wed May 18, 2005 3:09 pm

Looks to me like this is evidence that while the mid-level circulation appears to be quite organized and vigorous, the surface circulation is still not well-organized. It could be that the LLC will relocate, because I'm guessing it's still not well-centered under the MLC. If it was, I think the circulation would look markedly better now.
0 likes   

robjay

#4 Postby robjay » Wed May 18, 2005 8:52 pm

Does quikscat have any dynamic models?
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

#5 Postby soonertwister » Wed May 18, 2005 9:11 pm

robjay wrote:Does quikscat have any dynamic models?

Nope. It's just a low-orbit weather satellite that measures surface winds, about 30 feet off the terrain.

Don't get me started about this. QuikScat has been a pet peeve of mine for years, but I have had people tell me that it wouldn't be as accurate from the Clarke Belt. I have no way of verifying whether or not that's true, since they've never even attempted to measure surface winds from that distance.

If it did work, it would make that program 100-1000 times more valuable.
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

#6 Postby soonertwister » Wed May 18, 2005 9:35 pm

With the latest images we are finally seeing evidence of closed flow, and although the image is now slightly stale, in a system like this, a few degrees of separation between turning indicators can probably shrink in a pretty short period of time.

Cane in the morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalWXMA
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:22 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

#7 Postby TropicalWXMA » Wed May 18, 2005 9:38 pm

The outflow looks fairly good, a little chopped off on the western quadrent since there is a high to the west of the system. I'm with you guys on a cane in the morning...
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Iceresistance, riapal, WaveBreaking and 581 guests