West GOM will be busy
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
corpusbreeze
- Category 1

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:57 pm
West GOM will be busy
this year. First off the western to upper GOM would have been a lot more active if not for the saving grace of some out of charector weather patterns. The biggest being the almost unheard of strong front in August. If not for this freakish front Charley would have ventured west into the west GOM. I dont know what was the cause of these series of strong fronts in late summer, but the effect was a slow and uneventful cane season for Texas and the surrounding areas. With the NHC predicting a busy season, and water temps above normal for this time of the year already, people on the west GOM should not be complacint becuase of seasons like last year. Odds are the we wont be getting any fall weather again in the middle of August.
0 likes
-
Rainband
The WGOM was very quiet last year and that was fine by me. Previous years brought some scares to the Upper TX Coast such as Claudette, Fay, Lili and Isidore. We dodged the built again and again. I truely hope all you Floridians are spared any major storms this season.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
Rainband
Texas may be due. Check out this graphic I ripped from Cycloneye's post in the NOAA 2005 outlook thread. It doesn't appear that TX gets very many majors, in general, whether the season be deemed "above" or "below" "normal".:
I was very surprised that it doesn't appear that the upper TX coast has had any majors during the time periods presented in the graphic. Odd, huh?
[Edited to include the following:] The more I look at that, the more puzzling it seems. NO majors?!?? In fact, for the amount of coastline TX has, the entire state doesn't seem to be visited that frequently on a "storm per mile" basis. Odd.
I was very surprised that it doesn't appear that the upper TX coast has had any majors during the time periods presented in the graphic. Odd, huh?
[Edited to include the following:] The more I look at that, the more puzzling it seems. NO majors?!?? In fact, for the amount of coastline TX has, the entire state doesn't seem to be visited that frequently on a "storm per mile" basis. Odd.
0 likes
- southerngale
- Retired Staff

- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
Agua wrote:Texas may be due. Check out this graphic I ripped from Cycloneye's post in the NOAA 2005 outlook thread. It doesn't appear that TX gets very many majors, in general, whether the season be deemed "above" or "below" "normal".:
I was very surprised that it doesn't appear that the upper TX coast has had any majors during the time periods presented in the graphic. Odd, huh?
[Edited to include the following:] The more I look at that, the more puzzling it seems. NO majors?!?? In fact, for the amount of coastline TX has, the entire state doesn't seem to be visited that frequently on a "storm per mile" basis. Odd.
Being on the Upper Texas coast, I'm glad we haven't experienced a major. The last hurricane that hit here directly was Bonnie in 1986. It was a strong Cat.1 (some here argued there were weak Cat.2 sustained winds though) and she reeked enough havoc here. While it was nothing compared to the damage from the hurricanes last year, it was enough to give a glimpse of what a major would do.
I've seen the simulations of the storm surge from a cat. 5 hitting here and it was very ugly.
We did get Allison after that, but she was "just" a tropical storm. Major flooding with Allison, but of course, no wind damage.
0 likes
- BayouVenteux
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 775
- Age: 64
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:26 pm
- Location: Ascension Parish, Louisiana (30.3 N 91.0 W)
Agua wrote:I was very surprised that it doesn't appear that the upper TX coast has had any majors during the time periods presented in the graphic. Odd, huh?
[Edited to include the following:] The more I look at that, the more puzzling it seems. NO majors?!?? In fact, for the amount of coastline TX has, the entire state doesn't seem to be visited that frequently on a "storm per mile" basis. Odd.
It is odd Agua, and the fact that the graphic only covers a 47-year span (a blink, historically speaking) serves to further emphasize that fact. Looking back at historical records from 1850-1950, there are a number of landfalling Texas storms that from the anecdotal evidence and ship logs, appear to have been at least category 3 storms.
0 likes
- GulfBreezer
- Category 5

- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:58 pm
- Location: Gulf Breeze Fl
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 592 guests


