Final Hurricane Damages...

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Anonymous

Final Hurricane Damages...

#1 Postby Anonymous » Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:59 am

Hurricane Charley: 6.8 or 14.8 billion
Hurricane Frances: 4.4 or 8.8 billion
Hurricane Ivan::::: 6.0 or 12 billion
Hurricane Jeanne: 3.2 or 6.4 billion

http://www.sptimes.com/2004/10/27/Busin ... e_pa.shtml
0 likes   

User avatar
ohiostorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1582
Age: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#2 Postby ohiostorm » Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:23 pm

Is this for a specified region or total damages that the storms caused over the US? Because I thought Charley caused well over 20 billion.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#3 Postby Anonymous » Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:30 pm

I did too...but Charley is pretty much certain...14.8 billion.
0 likes   

User avatar
alicia-w
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6400
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:55 pm
Location: Tijeras, NM

Re: Final Hurricane Damages...

#4 Postby alicia-w » Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:32 pm

~Floydbuster wrote:Hurricane Charley: 6.8 or 14.8 billion
Hurricane Frances: 4.4 or 8.8 billion
Hurricane Ivan::::: 6.0 or 12 billion
Hurricane Jeanne: 3.2 or 6.4 billion

http://www.sptimes.com/2004/10/27/Busin ... e_pa.shtml


what do the two sets of numbers mean? for example, why is it 4.4 or 8.8? i dont understand.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#5 Postby Anonymous » Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:33 pm

adjusted and unadjusted
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#6 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:30 pm

There was a lot of flooding with Jeanne, and Ivan. Therefore, those two storms may have a higher value than indicated here since the national flood insurance program covers those losses
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Bottom line...

#7 Postby hurricanetrack » Thu Oct 28, 2004 10:50 pm

The 2004 hurricane season was the costliest ever.

Let's assume for a minute that the strong ridge in the eastern US holds for another year or so- why not? The trough was there for year after year it seemed. Can we expect more of the same for a few years to come.

That, to me, is where hurricane forecasting should go- looking for indications that a protective trough or an inviting ridge will be in place during a particular season. No trough= more landfalls right? And all it takes is a six week period like we saw this season for all heck to break loose.

I will really be interested to see how dry Florida is come Spring. If May is record dry, then I put money on more landfalls next season. We shall see. Interesting stuff though.
0 likes   

Anonymous

Re: Bottom line...

#8 Postby Anonymous » Thu Oct 28, 2004 10:53 pm

hurricanetrack wrote:The 2004 hurricane season was the costliest ever.

Let's assume for a minute that the strong ridge in the eastern US holds for another year or so- why not? The trough was there for year after year it seemed. Can we expect more of the same for a few years to come.

That, to me, is where hurricane forecasting should go- looking for indications that a protective trough or an inviting ridge will be in place during a particular season. No trough= more landfalls right? And all it takes is a six week period like we saw this season for all heck to break loose.

I will really be interested to see how dry Florida is come Spring. If May is record dry, then I put money on more landfalls next season. We shall see. Interesting stuff though.


MORE OF THE SAME OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS :)
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#9 Postby senorpepr » Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:46 am

Why the smile?
0 likes   

Anonymous

#10 Postby Anonymous » Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:07 am

senorpepr wrote:Why the smile?


Nevermind... :wink:
0 likes   

Terry
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1450
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:25 pm
Location: Lakeland and Anna Maria Island, FL
Contact:

#11 Postby Terry » Fri Oct 29, 2004 10:47 am

I'd like to see the total estimate costs of each hurricane, including flood insurance paid out, deductible and out of pocket costs.

For example, I just paid $4800 to have three trees removed that were damaged and partially uprooted during Jeanne. Not covered under insurance. Multiply that upteen thousand times just to get the non-insured tree damage in Florida alone.

Expensive year.
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#12 Postby Andrew92 » Fri Oct 29, 2004 11:56 am

I've been saying this to myself since Charley hit, and after Jeanne hit, it multiplied four times. I can't wait to see the official Tropical Cyclone Reports from the NHC to see what the damage figures were like according to them. And now it's gotten into "I don't wanna wait anymore" mode.

-Andrew92
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, kevin and 565 guests