2004 Hurricane Season: Major Hurricanes

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

2004 Hurricane Season: Major Hurricanes

#1 Postby donsutherland1 » Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:08 pm

Building on my earlier post concerning that the 2004 season was likely to be an active one, I will note although I had not anticipated quite the number of major hurricanes this season as had developed. That was my error, and contrary to the reports in some news articles that the number of major storms was not foreseeable, I have to disagree. Had I more closely examined the global data, there was major clue that a much above normal season with regard to major hurricanes lay ahead.

Upon closer examination of the global indices that pointed to an active season, which I had noted toward that end on several occasions, one found among the following for the 2004 season:

• MEI: Likely to be positive but average under +0.600 for the season
• QBO: Below +10 for the season and above -20 for the season
• PDO: > 0

The above profile is one that has featured seasons with above normal major hurricane development.

From 1950-2003 (1950 is the first year when such global indices were regularly reported), there were four seasons that met such criteria: 1958, 1969, 1981, and 1995.

The number of major hurricanes for those seasons was as follows:

1958: 5
1969: 5
1981: 3
1995: 5

Average: 4.50

That average is almost 75% above the 1950-2003 average of 2.6 major hurricanes per season.

Consequently, although I did not expect the large number of major hurricanes for 2004, this error was the result of my own failure to have more closely examined the data for possible indications of a lot of major hurricanes. It was not on account of the idea that predicting above normal major hurricane development is largely unforeseeable.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#2 Postby dhweather » Sat Oct 09, 2004 2:01 pm

Don, I really think you do a great job in your analysis, pre and post storm. Thanks for your input!!
0 likes   

User avatar
James
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1531
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Contact:

#3 Postby James » Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:50 pm

I second that.
0 likes   

Anonymous

#4 Postby Anonymous » Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:01 pm

My forecast for 2004 was:
FINAL TALLY:
15 Named Storms
10 Hurricanes
6 Major Hurricanes
USA LANDFALLS: 7
USA HURRICANES: 6
USA MAJORS: 2

I knew we would have atleast 2 major US landfalls. Some said I was being crazy... but I was right. Infact, my 2 major hurricane tally was not enough!
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#5 Postby donsutherland1 » Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:26 pm

Thanks for the compliments, James and Dhweather. Great job Floydbuster.
0 likes   

Opal storm

#6 Postby Opal storm » Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:48 pm

The only thing I forecasted this year was that Pensacola would get hit by a hurricane,and sure enough they did.I just thought nearly 9 years without a hurricane was too long and that their luck would soon run dry,and boy did it :eek:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 625 guests