Low near 97.6w 22.2n clearly visible...........

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Low near 97.6w 22.2n clearly visible...........

#1 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:50 am

and very near Tampico. This low is just along the coast in Mexico and seems to be nearly stationary at the present. You can clearly see it on this visible loop.......watch the darker grey lower level swirl.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Guest

#2 Postby Guest » Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:54 am

I see more of a the center being at 19.5N 96W.

http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#3 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:57 am

Redder wrote:I see more of a the center being at 19.5N 96W.

http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html


No, it isn't. You have to focus on the darker lower level clouds. The bright white clouds are higher level and thus not at the surface.
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Guest

#4 Postby Guest » Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:59 am

Dean4Storms wrote:
Redder wrote:I see more of a the center being at 19.5N 96W.

http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html


No, it isn't. You have to focus on the darker lower level clouds. The bright white clouds are higher level and thus not at the surface.


OK
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#5 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:00 am

Try the Zoom in feature at the link I provided above and zoom in and watch just inland and north of where you see that little bit of a thumb sticking out along the east coast of Mexico, I think you'll see what I'm referencing.
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Guest

#6 Postby Guest » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:04 am

Dean4Storms wrote:Try the Zoom in feature at the link I provided above and zoom in and watch just inland and north of where you see that little bit of a thumb sticking out along the east coast of Mexico, I think you'll see what I'm referencing.


I did and from my view I see a swirl and low level injection at a point ESE of Vera Cruz.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Low near 97.6w 22.2n clearly visible...........

#7 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:06 am

Dean4Storms wrote:and very near Tampico. This low is just along the coast in Mexico and seems to be nearly stationary at the present. You can clearly see it on this visible loop.......watch the darker grey lower level swirl.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html



O.K. if this is the case now what should we expect?
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: Low near 97.6w 22.2n clearly visible...........

#8 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:11 am

Stormcenter wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:and very near Tampico. This low is just along the coast in Mexico and seems to be nearly stationary at the present. You can clearly see it on this visible loop.......watch the darker grey lower level swirl.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html



O.K. if this is the case now what should we expect?



This is where the models begin to initialize a low and take it NNE toward southern LA as the trough in the plains draws it northward along the back side of the ridge over the eastern CONUS. Currently there is too much shear for much development, but it does bear watching.
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#9 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:18 am

Redder wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:Try the Zoom in feature at the link I provided above and zoom in and watch just inland and north of where you see that little bit of a thumb sticking out along the east coast of Mexico, I think you'll see what I'm referencing.


I did and from my view I see a swirl and low level injection at a point ESE of Vera Cruz.


I see what you are referencing and actually Vera Cruz has the lowest pressure between Tampico and itself. VC @ 1013mb and Tampico @ 1015mb. So it could be that we have a broad area of low pressure with a battle taking place for a center.
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Guest

#10 Postby Guest » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:23 am

Im glad you see it, and I see what your talking about as well. This could get interesting for E Tx and Louisiana later this week. We've had a ton of rain and I hope it developes just a bit to keep the rain away from S. Tex because we dont need anymore :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
~SirCane
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 9:55 pm
Location: Pensacola, FL
Contact:

#11 Postby ~SirCane » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:28 am

Reminds me too much of where Opal began. Don't need an Opal right now!!
0 likes   

Guest

#12 Postby Guest » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:41 am

No Opal thats for sure, I was talking about a fast moving tropical storm. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#13 Postby Stormsfury » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:43 am

Clearly visible? ...

All I see is a choatic mess with NO apparent low level circulation ... AT BEST, I observe low level clouds moving SW, and that's SW of the congealed showers and thunderstorms ...

A SFC low will likely take shape and might be in process of doing so, conditions aloft are still not particularly favorable for tropical development ... enhancement of the SBJ will laden this conglamorated mass with tons of tropical moisture ... irregardless of development or not, this is a supersoaker a coming ...

SF
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#14 Postby WeatherEmperor » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:51 am

I agree with Stormfury. Although not impossible, I dont look for much development out of this right away. Now if it sits and spins there longer that would be a different story.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#15 Postby wxman57 » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:51 am

Stormsfury wrote:Clearly visible? ...

All I see is a choatic mess with NO apparent low level circulation ... AT BEST, I observe low level clouds moving SW, and that's SW of the congealed showers and thunderstorms ...

A SFC low will likely take shape and might be in process of doing so, conditions aloft are still not particularly favorable for tropical development ... enhancement of the SBJ will laden this conglamorated mass with tons of tropical moisture ... irregardless of development or not, this is a supersoaker a coming ...

SF


I agree, SF, nothing there yet. I'm looking at some much higher resolution imagery here with surface obs plotted and all I see is an area of convergence in that area. No evidence of a circulation yet, surface of aloft. I think we'll get a low form out there, though, but probably not until late tomorrow or Friday.
0 likes   

Guest

#16 Postby Guest » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:56 am

Well I DONT agree with either of YOU! :wink:
0 likes   

Guest

#17 Postby Guest » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:57 am

8-)
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#18 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:57 am

Looking at the latest infrared satellite
loop there seems to be alot of deep
convection building deep in the BOC.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#19 Postby wxman57 » Wed Oct 06, 2004 11:01 am

Stormcenter wrote:Looking at the latest infrared satellite
loop there seems to be alot of deep
convection building deep in the BOC.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html


Yep, convergence is increasing - the first step toward developing an LLC. Now we'll have to get the squalls to persist in one area for another 24 hours or so.
0 likes   

Guest

#20 Postby Guest » Wed Oct 06, 2004 11:04 am

I hope you peeps know Im kidding, but when all CAPS are used I like to do the same.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 263 guests