GFS Out of Rehab? Is it on to Something?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#21 Postby MWatkins » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:03 pm

ToHellWithWishCasters151 wrote:Not surprizing that you agree with this model. It has it headed for S FL exactly what your wanting and been wanting for some time now. Just wait when the model shifts back into the atlantic out to sea or shifts towards the other gulf coast states, then you will be the first to say that the gfs is wrong. It really is ashame that you have become sort of a wishcaster as of late, i used to take you seriously but now idk...When a supposed "good" forcaster as yourself aims it for south fl(your living area) instead of the most likely area at this time(the panhandle or mobile(sp) then i have to start asking questions. Maybe the people in FL have just gone insane from all the hits you've taken in the last month. If i am wrong and it does hit S FL then more credit to you and i will surely eat the crow thats served to me.


You are welcome to your opinion...but you should really go back and read my first sentence.

I am simply giving a reason that the solution should not be summarily ignored since everyone here thinks the dang model doesn't know what it's doing. I did NOT call for a SFL landfall. A track closer to 82W is what will probably occur...again note that an SFL landfall is not mentioned ANYWHERE in the post.

Also...note the following is what is happening now...no opinion involved. And also note...no mention of a SFL landfall.

Ivan is definitely behind the NHC schedule from 11AM. We have just hit our first 12 hour verification point since the "forecast thinking" shifted westward some. Consider the most recent advisory:

AT 8 PM AST...0000Z...THE CENTER OF HURRICANE IVAN WAS LOCATED BY AN AIR FORCE RESERVE HURRICANE HUNTER AIRCRAFT NEAR LATITUDE 15.2 NORTH...LONGITUDE 72.8 WEST

And now the forecast point from the 11AM:

FORECAST VALID 10/0000Z 15.3N 73.3W

The hurricane is well right of that number now...since northwise it is almost there (15.2 vs 15.3) and already a half of a degree slow (72.8 vs 73.3).

Just pointing out the not so obvious.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

Dave C
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Middleboro, Mass.(midway between Cape Cod and Boston)

#22 Postby Dave C » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:04 pm

Tohellwithwishcasters151,to say someone wants a hurricane to hit somewhere is an unacceptable insult. That is what I gather from your post. I think you owe M Watkins an apology.
0 likes   

Guest

#23 Postby Guest » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:06 pm

ALhurricane wrote:ToHellWithWishCasters151,

I think your comments toward Mike are completely off base with no facts supporting it. I don't know if you are trying to get a rise out of people by posting that, but frankly it is out of line.

I know Mike can speak for himself, but let me just say that he is very intelligent and highly respected on this board. If you really think Mike is -removed- this storm to S FL, then you really don't know him at all.

Why don't you actually READ his post instead of inferring what you want out of it. You might learn something....


I have read the post and read plenty of mike's forecasts. Believe i know he is highly resepected and he has enough good forecasts to gain that respect. I agree my post was a bit harsh, but i felt it had to be said. Thats me though i speak my mind. IMO he has been -removed- this storm all week. Like i said if i am wrong and it hits S FL then more credit to mike and i will eat crow.
0 likes   

Rainband

#24 Postby Rainband » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:08 pm

ToHellWithWishCasters151 wrote:
ALhurricane wrote:ToHellWithWishCasters151,

I think your comments toward Mike are completely off base with no facts supporting it. I don't know if you are trying to get a rise out of people by posting that, but frankly it is out of line.

I know Mike can speak for himself, but let me just say that he is very intelligent and highly respected on this board. If you really think Mike is -removed- this storm to S FL, then you really don't know him at all.

Why don't you actually READ his post instead of inferring what you want out of it. You might learn something....


I have read the post and read plenty of mike's forecasts. Believe i know he is highly resepected and he has enough good forecasts to gain that respect. I agree my post was a bit harsh, but i felt it had to be said. Thats me though i speak my mind. IMO he has been -removed- this storm all week. Like i said if i am wrong and it hits S FL then more credit to mike and i will eat crow.
Mike is NOT a wishcaster he is a very respected individual. I am still waiting for the apology to him :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1336
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

#25 Postby CourierPR » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:11 pm

Good grief. One West Palm Beach met just said that the high is building in toward Florida and will force Ivan west. Another met said that a trough is coming down to erode the ridge. What gives?
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#26 Postby MWatkins » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:11 pm

IMO he has been -removed- this storm all week.


If not calling for a track near 90 west in 3 days...and following the vast majority of the guidance instead of a lonely model from the Great White North is -removed-...then...guilty as charged.

You are welcome to go back and find any posts that "forecast" or "wishcast" a SFL landfall. You will not find one.

That is all I'm going to say on the subject...if you have a problem with any analysis I bring to the table...please focus on the analysis instead of name calling. I have always done the same.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

Guest

#27 Postby Guest » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:13 pm

Its not a secret that that we have people I disagree with on this board, i think everyone knows that. I respect mike and his forecasts but lately i have just felt the wishcaster vibe. Like i said maybe all the impact has caused the forecasters in FL to go insane. All i did here was give an opinion and i shouldn't be shot down for it.
0 likes   

FungusMoldlyColdcuts

#28 Postby FungusMoldlyColdcuts » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:14 pm

Um sorry but Mr. Watkins is not a wishcaster. I understand where you are coming from ToHellWithWishcasters. I agree there are many people on this board who do infact, wishcast storms and have no basis.

I have pointed out routinely that this synoptic setup is much different than that of Frances. The surging ULL is actually further south than gridded by the GFS about 4 days ago. At least the GFS accurately pointed towards this development unlike other models (ahem NOGAPS GGEM etc etc). GFS performed quite well with Charley if you remember. Why don't people remember GFS as the 'outlier' model which entirely accurately predicted Frances slowing. Please, the GFS has it's downfalls as every other model. Mike is simply pointing out the fact that the GFS could easily hold some water here, be it the hurricanes track or the synoptics and subtle changes in the grids. he is using reasoning for this and THAT IS WHAT METEOROLOGISTS DO, be it if the model is presumed accurate or not.
0 likes   

FungusMoldlyColdcuts

#29 Postby FungusMoldlyColdcuts » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:14 pm

If you totally discounted the GFS while charley was south of Cuba, we would have had landfall near Pensacola. with the damn UKMet and NOGAPS surging the storm due north. Let's be reasonable here.
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#30 Postby yoda » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:15 pm

I think its time to lock this thread...
0 likes   

User avatar
ameriwx2003
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 980
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am

#31 Postby ameriwx2003 » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:16 pm

First Mike Watkins is not a wishcaster!!!!!.. secondly the GFS has trended slightly west from the 0Z run to the 18 Z RUN.. The 12Z EURO and the 18Z GFS are close now with there solutions.

0Z GFS run

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _120.shtml

18 Z GFS run

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... _102.shtml

12Z Euro

http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts ... 4090912!!/

MW I would be interested in your take on the intensity of Ivan once it gets in the SE Gulf( providing it do)es.. It seems there is some debate about if there will or will not be increasing shear in the Gulf..
0 likes   

NorthGaWeather

#32 Postby NorthGaWeather » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:34 pm

FungusMoldlyColdcuts wrote:Um sorry but Mr. Watkins is not a wishcaster. I understand where you are coming from ToHellWithWishcasters. I agree there are many people on this board who do infact, wishcast storms and have no basis.

I have pointed out routinely that this synoptic setup is much different than that of Frances. The surging ULL is actually further south than gridded by the GFS about 4 days ago. At least the GFS accurately pointed towards this development unlike other models (ahem NOGAPS GGEM etc etc). GFS performed quite well with Charley if you remember. Why don't people remember GFS as the 'outlier' model which entirely accurately predicted Frances slowing. Please, the GFS has it's downfalls as every other model. Mike is simply pointing out the fact that the GFS could easily hold some water here, be it the hurricanes track or the synoptics and subtle changes in the grids. he is using reasoning for this and THAT IS WHAT METEOROLOGISTS DO, be it if the model is presumed accurate or not.


Hmm...the NOGAPS had the best handle early this morning on the low.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#33 Postby southerngale » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:37 pm

ToHellWithWishCasters151 wrote:Its not a secret that that we have people I disagree with on this board, i think everyone knows that. I respect mike and his forecasts but lately i have just felt the wishcaster vibe. Like i said maybe all the impact has caused the forecasters in FL to go insane. All i did here was give an opinion and i shouldn't be shot down for it.

Enough! Mike is not a wishcaster and in case you missed the various threads regarding this, simply don't call ANYONE a wishcaster on this board, whether you think it or not. In this case, it's just absurd anyway. The NHC projected path and the models all point to that "vicinity" and nobody knows exactly where it's going.
In other cases, it's common sense that people are more concerned with a hit in their area and would make more comments and ask more questions with that in mind. That does not make them a wishcaster and we will not allow our members to be afraid to post for fear of being called a wishcaster.

I think Rainband already warned you...lay off.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#34 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:39 pm

ToHellWithWishCasters151 wrote:Not surprizing that you agree with this model. It has it headed for S FL exactly what your wanting and been wanting for some time now. Just wait when the model shifts back into the atlantic out to sea or shifts towards the other gulf coast states, then you will be the first to say that the gfs is wrong. It really is ashame that you have become sort of a wishcaster as of late, i used to take you seriously but now idk...When a supposed "good" forcaster as yourself aims it for south fl(your living area) instead of the most likely area at this time(the panhandle or mobile(sp) then i have to start asking questions. Maybe the people in FL have just gone insane from all the hits you've taken in the last month. If i am wrong and it does hit S FL then more credit to you and i will surely eat the crow thats served to me.


I know I'll get flamed for saying but I believe it must be said.
I DON'T agree with everything this guy posted about Mike but some of what he says does have merit. I have always liked reading Mike's post but for some reason he has been biased toward a S. Florida landfall. In my opinion a good forecaster always looks at different scenarios and does NOT just focus on one. Especially when you have a storm that is still several days away from landfall. Many on this board including Mike have been saying a S. Florida/Florida landfall even before Ivan entered the Carribean!!! Again if you want to flame me then so be it.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#35 Postby southerngale » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:43 pm

stormcenter...if that's where he thinks it is going, should he abandon that idea just because he lives there? Of course not!
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#36 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:47 pm

southerngale wrote:stormcenter...if that's where he thinks it is going, should he abandon that idea just because he lives there? Of course not!


southerngale if Mike is right I will be the first to apologize but for his
sake (because he lives in the Miami area) I HOPE he is wrong.
Actually I hope no one feels the full wrath of Ivan he ends up being like Frances/Lilli and weakening before landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
WeatherNLU
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:50 pm

#37 Postby WeatherNLU » Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:49 pm

This is so stupid. MW is biased towards a S FL landfall because that what his meteorological instincts tell him. I am biased towards a FL panhandle landfall, because that's what mine tell me. I don't know where MW went to school for ATMS but I imagine he got the same education I did. When you can put your knowledge into the situation and feel comfortable with your forecast, that's all that matters.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#38 Postby southerngale » Thu Sep 09, 2004 8:09 pm

But why judge him in the first place? That's just wrong. He has a very respectable reputation, not to mention just an all around great guy. It's not like he lives in Galveston and is forecasting it to hit there. He's in Miami. Have you seen the model maps? :eek:

Anyway, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Let's all just keep the insulting comments about our forecasters and members off the board please. Thanks! :)
0 likes   

Guest

#39 Postby Guest » Thu Sep 09, 2004 8:13 pm

Is this a weather forum, because in a weather form i thought we were suspose to comment on our thoughts about others forecasts. oh well...
0 likes   

Anonymous

#40 Postby Anonymous » Thu Sep 09, 2004 8:16 pm

Why do you all seem to jump on EVERYBODY and ANYBODY that criticizes a S2K forecaster / mod/ whatever? If he said this to a normal member you all would not be so edgy and pissed off.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Teban54 and 207 guests