Evening Ivan Forecast... 135KT in SE GOM
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Derek Ortt
Evening Ivan Forecast... 135KT in SE GOM
http://www.nwhhc.com/atl092004forecast.html
I appologize for no track graphics, we had a major network outage today at RSMAS and I was unable to access MATLAB or any other plotting program to make anything
I appologize for no track graphics, we had a major network outage today at RSMAS and I was unable to access MATLAB or any other plotting program to make anything
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
- CalmBeforeStorm
- Category 2

- Posts: 600
- Age: 72
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
- Location: Stuart, Florida
Derek Ortt wrote:this is going to be horrible for very many people, already has leveled the island of Grenada and caused significant damage to others
You seem to be basing your forecast on the persistant westerly movement. Did you note that the GFS doesn't start moving the storm WNW until after 65w but still manages to get the storm well east of Florida?
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
i have found so many errors in the GFS model (absolute BS initial conditions, I am working on a note for submission to MWR regarding its BS initial conditions for Isabel), that I have 0 confidence in the model and will never take it seriously, unless it is in agreement with the Canadian and a few others
0 likes
- CalmBeforeStorm
- Category 2

- Posts: 600
- Age: 72
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
- Location: Stuart, Florida
Derek Ortt wrote:i have found so many errors in the GFS model (absolute BS initial conditions, I am working on a note for submission to MWR regarding its BS initial conditions for Isabel), that I have 0 confidence in the model and will never take it seriously, unless it is in agreement with the Canadian and a few others
It did nail the virtual stalkl of Frances just off the Florida coast.
0 likes
Derek Ortt wrote:i have found so many errors in the GFS model (absolute BS initial conditions, I am working on a note for submission to MWR regarding its BS initial conditions for Isabel), that I have 0 confidence in the model and will never take it seriously, unless it is in agreement with the Canadian and a few others
Isn't GFS the "product" of combining the MRF and another model?
0 likes
-
Derek Ortt
-
PurdueWx80
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:i have found so many errors in the GFS model (absolute BS initial conditions, I am working on a note for submission to MWR regarding its BS initial conditions for Isabel), that I have 0 confidence in the model and will never take it seriously, unless it is in agreement with the Canadian and a few others
It did nail the virtual stalkl of Frances just off the Florida coast.
And consistently brought the storm to the Carolina/GA coastline. It has been too far north all season.
0 likes
- CalmBeforeStorm
- Category 2

- Posts: 600
- Age: 72
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
- Location: Stuart, Florida
Derek Ortt wrote:GFS is a combination of AVN and MRF
GFS was atrocious for longer than 4 days for Frances. It had the storm inland over SC. I'm still waiting for the SC landfall
Not to criticize but at one point you stated that Frances wouls either weaken and run into South America or recurve out to sea. You did much better later.
0 likes
Between Derek and AF MET laying out the ground work had Frances pegged for FL days before the NHC ever thought.The NHC did not get it right till they had to look at it in there face.The fact why there models was off was due to bad dropsonde data corrupting the models.While the rest of the models like CMC,UKMET and LBAR devoid of this info got the storm halfway right.Synoptics plays a big part of the forcast in my eyes.Look and think about the picture do not rely on the computer to spit out the numbers for yea.God gave us a brain that for most of us if we use is better than the computer.
0 likes
- CalmBeforeStorm
- Category 2

- Posts: 600
- Age: 72
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
- Location: Stuart, Florida
casper wrote:Between Derek and AF MET laying out the ground work had Frances pegged for FL days before the NHC ever thought.The NHC did not get it right till they had to look at it in there face.The fact why there models was off was due to bad dropsonde data corrupting the models.While the rest of the models like CMC,UKMET and LBAR devoid of this info got the storm halfway right.Synoptics plays a big part of the forcast in my eyes.Look and think about the picture do not rely on the computer to spit out the numbers for yea.God gave us a brain that for most of us if we use is better than the computer.
The NHC was showing a north of WPB landfall at least 72 hours in advance and only aired on the speed by not trusting the GFS's near stall.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: gatorcane, pepecool20, ronjon and 71 guests




