forcast models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- charleston_hugo_veteran
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1590
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:47 pm
- Location: Charleston, S.C.
Re: forcast models
BUD wrote:based on the models does know if any of them are that accurate
i'm a newbie...from what most are saying it seems as though the NHC (as a combination of models) has been pretty good this year...some mentioned one or two models sticking out (i'm not sure which ones)...and 95% i think will agree that there is a lot of water between the U.S. and Ivan
0 likes
- charleston_hugo_veteran
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1590
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:47 pm
- Location: Charleston, S.C.
Euro Link
http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts ... 4082800!!/[url][url]http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts/d/char
ts/medium/deterministic/msl_uv850_z500!Geopotential%20500%20hPa!168!North%20America!pop!od!oper!public_plots!2004082800!!/[/url][/url]
ts/medium/deterministic/msl_uv850_z500!Geopotential%20500%20hPa!168!North%20America!pop!od!oper!public_plots!2004082800!!/[/url][/url]
0 likes
-
weatherfsu
- Tropical Low

- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 3:45 pm
From what I have seen, the models all have their flaws. The FSU SuperEnsemble is very accurate, but it is not available to the public. Basically it takes several models, removes biases from them, crunches them together, and comes up with a result.
You will hear the NHC referencing this a lot, and tayloring their forecasts after it...even if a lot of the individual models don't agree.
You will hear the NHC referencing this a lot, and tayloring their forecasts after it...even if a lot of the individual models don't agree.
0 likes
- Aquawind
- Category 5

- Posts: 6714
- Age: 62
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
- Location: Salisbury, NC
- Contact:
I wish NHC wrote a model analysis of each storm as it progressed for the 3 and 5 day forecasts..Then after landfall a complete model analysis..even if it was only in statistical terms..I would enjoy hearing about the individual forecast analysis at 24 hour incriments up to 5 days and then a general overview..at least providing the statistical data for a public format would provide for some interesting debate..I know the data is available..I am talkin about something highly available and in a consistant format breakdown..some overview verbage would be accepted as well..
0 likes
- Stormsfury
- Category 5

- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
The GFDL is horrid past 72 hours ...
EURO (ECMWF) is by far, the best MR model out there ... time and time again, verification scores consistently rank #1 ... precautionary note (NEVER use the ECMWF in the SR inside of Day 3) ...
One link for the ECMWF model (Plymouth Make your own Maps)
http://www.stormsfury1.com/Weather/Models/ECMWF.html
EURO (ECMWF) is by far, the best MR model out there ... time and time again, verification scores consistently rank #1 ... precautionary note (NEVER use the ECMWF in the SR inside of Day 3) ...
One link for the ECMWF model (Plymouth Make your own Maps)
http://www.stormsfury1.com/Weather/Models/ECMWF.html
0 likes
- weatherwoman
- Category 1

- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 9:09 pm
- Location: Newport North Carolina
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Noots and 119 guests




