Corrupted Data in the models - SE FL at greater risk
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
logybogy
Corrupted Data in the models - SE FL at greater risk
Fascinating discussion on talkintropics radio show. Max Mayfield apparently is very, very, concerned about some faulty dropsones that went into the storm last night and screwed up the models. He said this in a teleconference with County Emergency Management Directors.
0 likes
-
Dean4Storms
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
I questioned this in some thread somewhere, how the GFS went from consistancy westward to all over the east coast. I posted that it seemed to me that the Recon. info. seemed to screw up the models. It makes sense to me.
0 likes
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
caneman
Dean4Storms wrote:I questioned this in some thread somewhere, how the GFS went from consistancy westward to all over the east coast. I posted that it seemed to me that the Recon. info. seemed to screw up the models. It makes sense to me.
Wouldn't this have been the GFDL? Thought I read this morning that it was the one that benefited from the droposondes. Would explain why they are the only Northerly outlier.
0 likes
-
logybogy
I wondered about that possibility this morning. It seemed odd that as landfall grew closer, the model variance grew wider. Of course, other things could explain that as well such as some models picking up on elements not being recognized by other models.
IIrc, BarometerBob said he had spoken with an Emergency Management person who told him that Mayfield was concerned about the variance in the models and something was mentioned about somehow all the new data they put in somehow corrupted the models. Not sure if that meant the data was corrupted or the engine running the model somehow became corrupted by some event, or what was meant by that hearsay statement.
IIrc, BarometerBob said he had spoken with an Emergency Management person who told him that Mayfield was concerned about the variance in the models and something was mentioned about somehow all the new data they put in somehow corrupted the models. Not sure if that meant the data was corrupted or the engine running the model somehow became corrupted by some event, or what was meant by that hearsay statement.
0 likes
-
piedmontnc
- Tropical Wave

- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:50 pm
Dean4Storms wrote:I questioned this in some thread somewhere, how the GFS went from consistancy westward to all over the east coast. I posted that it seemed to me that the Recon. info. seemed to screw up the models. It makes sense to me.
I'll second that. I remember reading your post. I suspected something when they would not change their track very much even with the models turning north.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hammy, KirbyDude25 and 146 guests





