Why is Frances moving W to WSW now?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Guest
Why is Frances moving W to WSW now?
The last few satellite loops look like its move west for sure now, so how long will this last?
0 likes
- lilbump3000
- Category 4

- Posts: 966
- Age: 38
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 10:09 am
- Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
- Contact:
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148497
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Wobbles.Hurricanes move on stairsteps.If you see after 6 frames that movement then is a trend.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
-
TheShrimper
- Category 2

- Posts: 516
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:05 pm
- x-y-no
- Category 5

- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
TheShrimper wrote:It is not "due" west, as lattitude is being gained in the movement. Overall, the movement seems to be between 290-300 heading.
LOL ... who knows, maybe you're rihgt and I'm wrong. I've always been a little shaky at eyeballing angles.
0 likes
-
tampastorm
- Category 1

- Posts: 434
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 9:22 pm
- Location: TAMPA
- CalmBeforeStorm
- Category 2

- Posts: 600
- Age: 72
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
- Location: Stuart, Florida
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:TheShrimper wrote:It is not "due" west, as lattitude is being gained in the movement. Overall, the movement seems to be between 290-300 heading.
Based on the latest vortex message the storm has moved due west since 11:00.
B. 18 DEG 47 MIN N
55 DEG 14 MIN W
Wrong.
It's the old "minutes of arc" error. VORTEX statements use minutes of arc..60 minutes to a degree.
NHC statements convert that into Tenths of a degree.
The VORTEX places Frances at 18.8 N, 55.2 W.
Frances has gained .2 degrees of latitude since 11AM. Hence, it's NOT moving due West.
0 likes
Derecho wrote:CalmBeforeStorm wrote:TheShrimper wrote:It is not "due" west, as lattitude is being gained in the movement. Overall, the movement seems to be between 290-300 heading.
Based on the latest vortex message the storm has moved due west since 11:00.
B. 18 DEG 47 MIN N
55 DEG 14 MIN W
Wrong.
It's the old "minutes of arc" error. VORTEX statements use minutes of arc..60 minutes to a degree.
NHC statements convert that into Tenths of a degree.
The VORTEX places Frances at 18.8 N, 55.2 W.
Frances has gained .2 degrees of latitude since 11AM. Hence, it's NOT moving due West.
Correct me if I am wrong, but do they use minutes because of the curvature of the earth? Minutes is used for angles.
Last edited by Ola on Sun Aug 29, 2004 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
Guest
You know Derecho, I respect your meterological abilities as well as many others on this board but, lets call it like it is, a chicken is a chicken, same as a duck is a duck, now any reasonably intelligent individual can see a complete westward motion, dominating any gain in latitude. Watch the loop for yourself. Its this type of denial that caught S. Florida with their pants down with Charley.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
If you average this loop out, you get due westward motion overall.
Brian
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
If you average this loop out, you get due westward motion overall.
Brian
0 likes
Frederic1979 wrote:You know Derecho, I respect your meterological abilities as well as many others on this board but, lets call it like it is, a chicken is a chicken, same as a duck is a duck, now any reasonably intelligent individual can see a complete westward motion, dominating any gain in latitude. Watch the loop for yourself. Its this type of denial that caught S. Florida with their pants down with Charley.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
If you average this loop out, you get due westward motion overall.
Brian
Movement bearings are calculated with something like 6 hour averages. A loop is not a 6 hour loop. If you could pick any time interval to calculate bearing you could have a diferent movement for a system every 30 minutes. In order for forecast and analisys to make sense and be valid you need consistency, and I mean use the same measuring parameters all the time so data can be compared.
0 likes
-
Guest
Ola wrote:Frederic1979 wrote:You know Derecho, I respect your meterological abilities as well as many others on this board but, lets call it like it is, a chicken is a chicken, same as a duck is a duck, now any reasonably intelligent individual can see a complete westward motion, dominating any gain in latitude. Watch the loop for yourself. Its this type of denial that caught S. Florida with their pants down with Charley.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
If you average this loop out, you get due westward motion overall.
Brian
Movement bearings are calculated with something like 6 hour averages. A loop is not a 6 hour loop. If you could pick any time interval to calculate bearing you could have a diferent movement for a system every 30 minutes. In order for forecast and analisys to make sense and be valid you need consistency, and I mean use the same measuring parameters all the time so data can be compared.
This loop is over 5 hrs in length, what are you talking about?
Brian
0 likes
-
Guest
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: duilaslol and 331 guests

