-Eric

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Ola wrote:It is very interesting that the NHC has discounted the so called "tropical" models for this one on every run for the last couple of days. Im not saying they should not, because that map does look weird and it would be very very uncommon for a system to do that in that area, but I would like an explanation of why they have discounted the BAM models after 48 hours for many runs already. Just to learn why they are not trusted on this scenario. I guess it could be something about those models not being able to predict intensity of high presure ridges as the Globals can.

ericinmia wrote:
Hmm
The model map just updated... and noe the A98E is pointing on a more north-west direction... This is the same model that originally for days and days, had this storm hooking south into the carribean.
1. Before it was picking up on something suggesting to it that the storm would be forced south.
2. Now whatever that was is gone, or has changed to a large degree. The storm is now headed on an flipped vector, from its original.
-Eric

It is very interesting that the NHC has discounted the so called "tropical" models for this one on every run for the last couple of days. Im not saying they should not, because that map does look weird and it would be very very uncommon for a system to do that in that area, but I would like an explanation of why they have discounted the BAM models after 48 hours for many runs already. Just to learn why they are not trusted on this scenario. I guess it could be something about those models not being able to predict intensity of high presure ridges as the Globals can.
Weatherboy1 wrote:If I'm not mistaken (I posted this in another thread as well), the tropical models (Bamm, etc.) are all run off the GFS forecast grid. That means they are all based on the same global forecast, with subtle variations in how Frances would react within that environment. Other globals, such as the UKMET and NOGAPS, are much further N with the system ... though the UKMET has shifted radically to the W from its original forecast. So, they're including those outputs into their thinking (as well as the GFDL, which is further N).
Bottom line -- at this point, I think it is prudent for them to still forecast a more northerly track ... but warn in their discussions (as they did at 11) that the possibility exists for the track to be shifted further south. I think a lot will depend on what the 12 UTC global runs show.
Users browsing this forum: Team Ghost, Yellow Evan and 317 guests