While some have argued that the EC Model has an "undeserved" reputation, those who are familiar with the Model and its performance recognize that little could be farther from the truth.
When it comes to performance, there is real sizzle to back the EC's sex appeal among Mets:
Historic Performance:
<img src="http://wwwt.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/STATS/html/graphics/aczhist.sm.gif">
Recent Performance:
<img src="http://wwwt.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/STATS/html/graphics/acz5.gif">
In the end, so long as the EC continues to provide such outstanding performance, it will continue to enjoy an outstanding reputation among Models just as Paris and Rome do with regard to being fashion trendsetters.
The EC Model: Continues to Provide Superior Performance
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
donsutherland1
- S2K Analyst

- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
-
Guest
-
donsutherland1
- S2K Analyst

- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
Ummm...that's very nice, but......
So where's the average TC track forecast error?
Probably not even workable as a statistic since the EC's apparent lack of bogussing means a very high number of runs with an actual storm not even trackable on the model, I'd guess.
I could do it myself with Stormtrakker, but unfortunately none of the public EC maps on the web allow the use of the modeltrack lat-lon feature.....
So where's the average TC track forecast error?
Probably not even workable as a statistic since the EC's apparent lack of bogussing means a very high number of runs with an actual storm not even trackable on the model, I'd guess.
I could do it myself with Stormtrakker, but unfortunately none of the public EC maps on the web allow the use of the modeltrack lat-lon feature.....
0 likes
Re: The EC Model: Continues to Provide Superior Performance
donsutherland1 wrote:While some have argued that the EC Model has an "undeserved" reputation, those who are familiar with the Model and its performance recognize that little could be farther from the truth.
When it comes to performance, there is real sizzle to back the EC's sex appeal among Mets:
In the end, so long as the EC continues to provide such outstanding performance, it will continue to enjoy an outstanding reputation among Models just as Paris and Rome do with regard to being fashion trendsetters.
I wonder if Peter at EMC would agree that this is an apples to apples comparison for the operational environment?
M
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met

- Posts: 23080
- Age: 68
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Derecho wrote:Ummm...that's very nice, but......
So where's the average TC track forecast error?
Probably not even workable as a statistic since the EC's apparent lack of bogussing means a very high number of runs with an actual storm not even trackable on the model, I'd guess.
I could do it myself with Stormtrakker, but unfortunately none of the public EC maps on the web allow the use of the modeltrack lat-lon feature.....
I agree, the data provided don't indicate how the ECMWF stacks up against other models in predicting the formation and track of tropical cyclones. I recall just last week the EC driving Charley into Houston and stalling it there for 2 days.
0 likes
-
donsutherland1
- S2K Analyst

- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
Re: The EC Model: Continues to Provide Superior Performance
Wxcsi,
The point is that the EC does not have an "undeserved" reputation. One can argue over specific parameters, but this is a high-performing model. It isn't perfect and some might find weaknesses (e.g., one need only examine model biases for some), but it is very solid.
As for the comments about storm tracks, no model is perfect on those. The ECMWF had a bad run with respect to Charley. But there are many occasions on which it has solid run-to-run continuity and nails storm tracks. One should not judge it on the basis of a single bad run.
The point is that the EC does not have an "undeserved" reputation. One can argue over specific parameters, but this is a high-performing model. It isn't perfect and some might find weaknesses (e.g., one need only examine model biases for some), but it is very solid.
As for the comments about storm tracks, no model is perfect on those. The ECMWF had a bad run with respect to Charley. But there are many occasions on which it has solid run-to-run continuity and nails storm tracks. One should not judge it on the basis of a single bad run.
0 likes
Re: The EC Model: Continues to Provide Superior Performance
donsutherland1 wrote:Wxcsi,
The point is that the EC does not have an "undeserved" reputation. One can argue over specific parameters, but this is a high-performing model. It isn't perfect and some might find weaknesses (e.g., one need only examine model biases for some), but it is very solid.
As for the comments about storm tracks, no model is perfect on those. The ECMWF had a bad run with respect to Charley. But there are many occasions on which it has solid run-to-run continuity and nails storm tracks. One should not judge it on the basis of a single bad run.
All one has to do is consider how the ECMWF will outpreform the GFS when it comes to major east coast low pressure systems during the winter. especially WRT run-to-run continuity.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Team Ghost and 214 guests





