Charley's death toll

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Charley's death toll

#1 Postby HurricaneBill » Mon Aug 16, 2004 1:44 pm

It's getting very weird. Earlier, they were saying stacks of bodies were at mobile homes in Punta Gorda. Now, I think that area has said only 4 deaths. I also heard they finished the searches in the mobile homes and are moving on to other areas.

They refuse to say if any bodies are in the refrigerated trucks.

I'm not gonna go claiming there's a mass conspiracy like that wacko did with Hurricane Andrew's death toll. (Honestly, if the government was trying to cover up the death toll of Andrew, don't you think the media would have figured it out?)

I just want to know what is going on. Was there a large loss of life or no?
0 likes   

mascpa
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 500
Age: 70
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:43 am
Location: Jupiter, FL
Contact:

Loss of life

#2 Postby mascpa » Mon Aug 16, 2004 1:49 pm

The most recent number I have seen is 17.
0 likes   

tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 798
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

#3 Postby tallywx » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:01 pm

Time to revive the "Hurricane Andrew Coverup" article for a good laugh:

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/hurricane.html
0 likes   

rbaker

#4 Postby rbaker » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:19 pm

personally, I don't think there is going to be a massive lost of life, because alot of those mobile homes were empty, because they are occupied by the snow birds in the winter, not in August.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29133
Age: 74
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#5 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:20 pm

Part of the problem they are encountering here is the fact that many of the residents were probably up north at this time of year and have not been able to report back in due to the massive communications infrastructure destruction by Charley. Also many who did evacuate to other locations are probably not having an easy time getting back to whatever they have to go back to an become accounted for besides the comm problems noted above.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

Matthew5

#6 Postby Matthew5 » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:20 pm

It is very hard for me to believe that a cat5 hurricane, like Andrew, did not cause more death. If we look at histroy, there been many of times where thousands(In some cases hundreds of thousands) died with alot less. Look at the tropical low that hit Hati this May 3,300 people died. Charley went right across central Florida which doe's have more towns and citys then the southern part of the states in which Andrew went over. It is just very hard to Believe :(
0 likes   

User avatar
EmeraldCoast1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:35 am
Location: Pensacola, FL

#7 Postby EmeraldCoast1 » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:29 pm

Storm surge is what kills most people that are still around in a storm. We all know that now. Accidents are the second leading cause, i.e. tree falling when someone steps outside to take a look or auto accidents / electrocution.

Most people, and I'm talking the overwhelming majority, survive through these storms because they stay inside and use their heads. Most structures are safe enough for human beings to have a reasonable chance of survival if the structure is breached. How many times have we heard first hand accounts of someone describing what is like having the roof blow off of their house? The point is...THEY LIVED.

Comparing a mobile home park in Port Charlotte, Florida, United States to a village in Haiti is crazy. Plenty of poor people live in shacks on hills that become deadly mudslides during hurricanes.
0 likes   

User avatar
opera ghost
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#8 Postby opera ghost » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:40 pm

6000 died in 1900 on Galveston island. Why? Because they weren't evacuated and the storm surge essentially washed the barrier island clean.... anything the storm surge didn't kill the winds probably got. (get on the roof to escape the surge- get blown off the roof by the wind)

If you are out of the way of the dangerous waters- and have some protection from the dangerous winds- most people will survive a hurricane. There's always your surprise- a Uhaul gets picked up and thrown down on the house killing everyone- but for the most part the building codes in permanant structures have advanced to the point where people outside of ground zero can usually live through it.

It doesn't surprise me in the least that we have so few deaths in this day and age. Information, available shelter, and advanced building codes together cut down the deaths drastically.

Had there been todays storm information and access to the people- the 1900 hurricane might have been a disaster- but the island would have been evacuated well in advance and the loss of life would have been much MUCH smaller.
0 likes   

rbaker

#9 Postby rbaker » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:42 pm

inland flooding is now considered by the nhc to be the leading cause of death during a hurricane.
0 likes   

c5Camille

#10 Postby c5Camille » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:46 pm

yes... i believe that Camille killed quite a few
people... in many states as it progressed NNE...
I believe the flooding in West Virginia was deadly...
0 likes   

caneman

#11 Postby caneman » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:50 pm

One day, storm surge will kill again. As there are still too many people who don't evacuate. It is unbelievable to me that more people didn't die in this from storm surge. Any ideas on how high it actually was? I've heard anything from 7 ft. to 14ft.
0 likes   

User avatar
opera ghost
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#12 Postby opera ghost » Mon Aug 16, 2004 2:52 pm

I don't think they're going to know for a while yet- still trying to get into all the areas damaged. I'd guess we'll have some hard numbers to look at (surge, casualities, wind spread maps, etc etc) a month-2 months after landfall. For the moment the focus is on helping those in the worst hit areas :)
0 likes   

Guest

#13 Postby Guest » Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:01 pm

350 MPH winds?! .... what is the National Hurricane Bureau?....
emergency alert !?! that is what my 7 year old use to say when he played fireman when he was 4 y.o.


tallywx wrote:Time to revive the "Hurricane Andrew Coverup" article for a good laugh:

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/hurricane.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#14 Postby Lindaloo » Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:04 pm

tallywx, how do you know that nexus article is bogus??
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38264
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#15 Postby Brent » Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:12 pm

tallywx wrote:Time to revive the "Hurricane Andrew Coverup" article for a good laugh:

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/hurricane.html


I was doing a search on Andrew back on a boring winter day and stumbled across that. What a pile of you know what.

The Florida death toll is 17. I'm surprised(but thankful) it isn't higher. Storm surge and flooding though is the biggest killer and neither one was a big problem because A. The areas suspectible to surge were completely evacuated and B. The storm was moving fast and the flooding was only isolated.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
opera ghost
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#16 Postby opera ghost » Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:13 pm

Well the likelyhood of 350mph winds... come on Linda :) You've been around here long enough ot know that's just not feasable. Especially not "quickly escalated" from 214. 136mph jump from a windspeed that's generally considered next to impossible to a windspeed never heard of in the atlantic?

"On the afternoon of September 2, 1935, hundreds of people stood on the train platform in Matecumbe Key, Florida, anxiously awaiting the arrival of an evacuation train. The U.S. Weather Bureau had sent warning that a powerful hurricane was moving in from the Caribbean, and no one along the low-lying beaches of the Keys wanted to be in its path.
For hours, they waited at Islamorada Station as the train was held up in Homestead, delayed by red tape. By the time it finally arrived, so too had the most intense hurricane to strike the U.S. coastline in recorded history.
As the Labor Day Hurricane blew in, its winds roared with unimaginable force - more than 200 mph. Those waiting on the train platform were literally sandblasted beyond recognition, their clothes and skin sheared away. Even the smallest objects became deadly projectiles. Sheet metal and lumber were hurled through the air, impaling some victims against trees, decapitating others.
It was a gruesome scene, and one, thankfully, which has not been replayed to that extent since."

If the Labor day hurricane sandblasted victims to death with windspeeds in excess of 200mph- I can't beleive that *anything* anything or anyone at all would have remained at 350mph.
0 likes   

7635
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 1:00 pm
Location: morganton nc

#17 Postby 7635 » Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:20 pm

cnn reports some of the 17 died after the hurricane pass from car accdents and heart attacks?could this be a way to up the death toll?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurrilurker
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:32 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

#18 Postby Hurrilurker » Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:20 pm

tallywx wrote:Time to revive the "Hurricane Andrew Coverup" article for a good laugh:

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/hurricane.html

That would be hilarious if it were not totally true!!! :grrr:

My favorite part? "I'll shoot your damn asses!"
Last edited by Hurrilurker on Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Guest

#19 Postby Guest » Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:21 pm

I would say that storm surge was the biggest killer back in the day when there was little to no warning & hurricanes caught people off guard on the coast & out by the barrier islands.Today wind from a storm like this should be the biggest concern for bodily harm as we have all seen the images of what wind like this can do.
0 likes   

User avatar
Scott_inVA
Storm2k Forecaster
Storm2k Forecaster
Posts: 1238
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 5:44 pm
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Contact:

#20 Postby Scott_inVA » Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:34 pm

c5Camille wrote:yes... i believe that Camille killed quite a few
people... in many states as it progressed NNE...
I believe the flooding in West Virginia was deadly...


Virginia.

~153 people died in Virginia. Six were in Rockbridge County where I am located and can show folks the creeks still running that Camille created.

Next door is Nelson County; that's where most died (125-135). Houses remain buried today with victims inside from mudslides. 31 inches of rain fell in about 16 hours on the mountains here. At that time, Camille was "just" a Tropical Depression.

Scott
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kevin and 61 guests