Charley - A Perfect Reason Why.....

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23080
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Charley - A Perfect Reason Why.....

#1 Postby wxman57 » Sat Aug 14, 2004 5:26 am

Remember the thread about "what intensity hurricane would YOU ride out?" Many of you said a Cat 1 or a Cat 2, but not higher. So, based on that premise, those who would ride out a Cat 1 or 2 would have made the decision on Thursday to ride Charley out in Charlotte Harbor.

I tried to make the point that you can't make your evacuation decision based on the current intensity of a hurricane, or even on the forecast intensity. Hurricanes can strengthen 2 categories in just a few hours, as Charley did. If you live along the coast and your home cannot withstand 100+ mph wind or you're in an area that could be inundated by a Cat 3 or 4 storm surge, then you need to leave - perhaps even for a strong tropical storm. Because a strong tropical storm a day or two out could easily become a Cat 3-4 hurricane by the time it makes landfall, leaving no time for you to evacuate.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7240
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: Charley - A Perfect Reason Why.....

#2 Postby jlauderdal » Sat Aug 14, 2004 5:37 am

wxman57 wrote:Remember the thread about "what intensity hurricane would YOU ride out?" Many of you said a Cat 1 or a Cat 2, but not higher. So, based on that premise, those who would ride out a Cat 1 or 2 would have made the decision on Thursday to ride Charley out in Charlotte Harbor.

I tried to make the point that you can't make your evacuation decision based on the current intensity of a hurricane, or even on the forecast intensity. Hurricanes can strengthen 2 categories in just a few hours, as Charley did. If you live along the coast and your home cannot withstand 100+ mph wind or you're in an area that could be inundated by a Cat 3 or 4 storm surge, then you need to leave - perhaps even for a strong tropical storm. Because a strong tropical storm a day or two out could easily become a Cat 3-4 hurricane by the time it makes landfall, leaving no time for you to evacuate.


People shouldnt forget about the track. NHC had the affected area in the cone and they always say tht there can be errors in the track and thus the cone. I saw Max get tough last night on TV with the cone when asked about the Tampa situation. Good for him. Floridians should know better. You have to feel really bad for the people that rely on others to watch out for them like the nursing homes. Now the people runnign those places need to be held accountable. NHC is not on the hook for this one.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#3 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Aug 14, 2004 5:47 am

NHC should not be accountable at all for the track. However, some accountability is needed for NOT calling this a cat 3 at 11 a.m. when data from 10 a.m. suggested that the winds had in fact increased from 110 to 120-125 m.p.h. Maybe that 2 hours would have saved a few lives. Sad thing is we will never get the chance to know
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

#4 Postby soonertwister » Sat Aug 14, 2004 5:50 am

People are dead from this storm. Gone from this earth forever. Those who wish to scapegoat will always find a reason to blame someone else for their tragedy. Those in charge of others, such as hospitals and nursing homes, must use a higher standard of caution for those in their care. For all others who have been victimized by this storm, invariably they have in one way or another chosen their own fates, except for children and others powerless to control their own destinies, who may have been sacrificed by their own parents' or guardians' lack of common sense.

They chose to buy or rent homes in unprotected areas like barrier islands and low-lying areas near a hurricane-vulnerable coast. They chose not to protect their property from harm until it was too late to do so, or simply ignored the threat altogether. We should never underestimate the ability of people to deny that they are in harm's way. It's been shown over and over that people commit suicide by not heeding the warning signs that have been provided to them. You warn, then you get out of the way. As cruel as it sounds, if you have become a victim of Charley, it was very likely you that made that happen.

It's terribly sad but true. The majority of people who drown in flash floods drive into deep water by their own conscious choice. They've only been told a million times not to do that before they actually go and die.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7240
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#5 Postby jlauderdal » Sat Aug 14, 2004 6:00 am

Derek Ortt wrote:NHC should not be accountable at all for the track. However, some accountability is needed for NOT calling this a cat 3 at 11 a.m. when data from 10 a.m. suggested that the winds had in fact increased from 110 to 120-125 m.p.h. Maybe that 2 hours would have saved a few lives. Sad thing is we will never get the chance to know


You are right about maybe it would have saved a few lives. However, I know evac zones are based on intensity but wether its a 2 or three people need to prepare accordingly and understand that it can intensify rapidly. The problem in this case wasn;t the intensity it was the fact that people assumed it was going to Tampa and prepared that way which is a huge mistake.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148497
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#6 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 14, 2004 6:06 am

Derek Ortt wrote:NHC should not be accountable at all for the track. However, some accountability is needed for NOT calling this a cat 3 at 11 a.m. when data from 10 a.m. suggested that the winds had in fact increased from 110 to 120-125 m.p.h. Maybe that 2 hours would have saved a few lives. Sad thing is we will never get the chance to know


Derek when they do later the anaylisis and do the final report on Charley maybe they will make the upgrade at 11 AM in that final report.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Three Blind Mice
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Wrightsville Beach, NC

#7 Postby Three Blind Mice » Sat Aug 14, 2004 6:15 am

Hey, I think we should all realize those guys are probably sick about the turn of events. Hindsight is always perfect. Imagine you had a job where literally millions of people were depending on you and you were dealing with something as fickle as Hurricanes. But today alot of S. Florida families are dealing with cold realities of death. God bless those hit by Charley.

Don't just watch this tragedy from afar. HELP!! Lots of worthwhile agencies that will need our support.
0 likes   

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#8 Postby coriolis » Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:04 am

soonertwister wrote:People are dead from this storm. Gone from this earth forever. Those who wish to scapegoat will always find a reason to blame someone else for their tragedy. Those in charge of others, such as hospitals and nursing homes, must use a higher standard of caution for those in their care. For all others who have been victimized by this storm, invariably they have in one way or another chosen their own fates, except for children and others powerless to control their own destinies, who may have been sacrificed by their own parents' or guardians' lack of common sense.

They chose to buy or rent homes in unprotected areas like barrier islands and low-lying areas near a hurricane-vulnerable coast. They chose not to protect their property from harm until it was too late to do so, or simply ignored the threat altogether. We should never underestimate the ability of people to deny that they are in harm's way. It's been shown over and over that people commit suicide by not heeding the warning signs that have been provided to them. You warn, then you get out of the way. As cruel as it sounds, if you have become a victim of Charley, it was very likely you that made that happen.

It's terribly sad but true. The majority of people who drown in flash floods drive into deep water by their own conscious choice. They've only been told a million times not to do that before they actually go and die.


Nah, for most of 'em it's denial, not a death wish. This is an interesting topic, though. Do you want to take it outside, er, to the off topic?
0 likes   
This space for rent.

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#9 Postby GalvestonDuck » Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:17 am

soonertwister wrote:They chose to buy or rent homes in unprotected areas like barrier islands and low-lying areas near a hurricane-vulnerable coast.


This coming from someone living in tornado alley (or so I'd assume with a name like soonertwister [Oklahoma])?

"...unprotected areas like barrier islands..." Might not be invincible and I sure as heck would evacuate to save my life, but we have one hell of seawall that has offered protection to homes and landmarks since 1900.

I'll tell you what I tell vbhoutex -- Living here is no more dangerous than living in tornado alley, in flood plains, in the mountains where mudslides or avalanches occur, on fault lines where earthquakes shake the earth, in forests where fires burn, or up north with blizzards paralyze lives throughout the winter. If we could all find ONE nice cozy safe place on earth where we could live without EVER being at risk for a natural disaster, we'd end up being so darned overcrowded, underfed, diseased, and crime-ridden, it wouldn't be worth it. Or we'd all be packed into one nice, tight little perfect terrorist target, just right for dropping any sort of NBC weapon into.

BTW - the Red Cross' most responded-to disaster: simple one-home fires. The Galveston County Red Cross responds to at least 70 fires a month in our area, providing assistance and support to victims. It doesn't take a large-scale natural disaster to take a home or a life. And there's nowhere that's 100% safe to live.

Yes, I'll agree...they should have acted to protect their homes, or at most, their lives. But they can't be blamed for where they lived.

~Barrier-island-living Duck and proud of it
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#10 Postby Dean4Storms » Sat Aug 14, 2004 8:55 am

You must keep in mind, some people won't leave no matter what it looks like or what the officials are telling them. I'll leave whenever I see a "possibility" of a Cat 3 or stronger living here close to the beach and bay.
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
goodlife
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:41 pm
Location: Mandeville, Louisiana
Contact:

#11 Postby goodlife » Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:00 am

If I didn't hear this 100 times yesterday I didn't hear it once..
I listened to wtsp.com for a while and then switched to nbc-2.com
Over and over on both stations they repeated and repeated....GET OUT NOW....if you live in a mobile home...even if you're not in the storm's direct path..you NEED to get out.
I would never stay in a trailer during a storm...that's just absurd.
NHC nor any meteorologist anywhere is to blame for this utter destruction and loss of life. Mother Nature is going to do exactly as Mother Nature pleases...and she doesn't intend for us to be able to pinpoint her every move.
All in all....I think the NHC did a great job. The hurricane passed right in that cone where they said it would.
How many warnings do you have to give people before they listen?? I bet they will next time...those who are still alive to do so!
0 likes   

User avatar
zoeyann
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 610
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 9:27 am
Location: Houma, Louisiana
Contact:

#12 Postby zoeyann » Sat Aug 14, 2004 10:31 am

wxman57- that is an excellent point. Sorry to say that I have always been one of those people who made my decision based on intensity, and directional forecasts. Lili(2002) gave the people over here a scarebut we got lucky. and now this. It has certainly made me change my thinking. I am just sorry for the people in Florida who felt they could ride out a 2 and got a 4 instead. The only good thing that can come out of this tragdy is that other people can learn for their mistakes so that more lives won't have to be lost the next time one of these systems affect someone
0 likes   

User avatar
seaswing
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 561
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 11:56 am
Location: High Springs, FL/just NW of Gainesville

#13 Postby seaswing » Sat Aug 14, 2004 10:48 am

cycloneye wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:NHC should not be accountable at all for the track. However, some accountability is needed for NOT calling this a cat 3 at 11 a.m. when data from 10 a.m. suggested that the winds had in fact increased from 110 to 120-125 m.p.h. Maybe that 2 hours would have saved a few lives. Sad thing is we will never get the chance to know


Derek when they do later the anaylisis and do the final report on Charley maybe they will make the upgrade at 11 AM in that final report.


Just like Andrew in '92--wasn't it a cat 5 when they did their research? to little, to late.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#14 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Aug 14, 2004 3:29 pm

soonertwister wrote:People are dead from this storm. Gone from this earth forever. Those who wish to scapegoat will always find a reason to blame someone else for their tragedy. Those in charge of others, such as hospitals and nursing homes, must use a higher standard of caution for those in their care. For all others who have been victimized by this storm, invariably they have in one way or another chosen their own fates, except for children and others powerless to control their own destinies, who may have been sacrificed by their own parents' or guardians' lack of common sense.

They chose to buy or rent homes in unprotected areas like barrier islands and low-lying areas near a hurricane-vulnerable coast. They chose not to protect their property from harm until it was too late to do so, or simply ignored the threat altogether. We should never underestimate the ability of people to deny that they are in harm's way. It's been shown over and over that people commit suicide by not heeding the warning signs that have been provided to them. You warn, then you get out of the way. As cruel as it sounds, if you have become a victim of Charley, it was very likely you that made that happen.

It's terribly sad but true. The majority of people who drown in flash floods drive into deep water by their own conscious choice. They've only been told a million times not to do that before they actually go and die.


Yet, there will be lawyers out there who will go to the victims and encourage them to file lawsuits. As if this were all preventable.

You can't prevent nature. You can only prepare.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#15 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Aug 14, 2004 3:34 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:You must keep in mind, some people won't leave no matter what it looks like or what the officials are telling them. I'll leave whenever I see a "possibility" of a Cat 3 or stronger living here close to the beach and bay.


Same here. I live well inland. However, when asked if I'd ever want to be in a hurricane, I said "Yes, but only in a Category 1".

By Category 1, I mean the whole system. If I was on the coast and it looked like the storm had potential to get higher, I'd evacuate.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

It can always go higher

#16 Postby Steve Cosby » Sat Aug 14, 2004 3:49 pm

HurricaneBill wrote:If I was on the coast and it looked like the storm had potential to get higher, I'd evacuate.


That's something people are not getting: it CAN ALWAYS go higher for reasons other than sea temperature and lack of shear or anything else.

Bastardi has harped on this several times in the past: the frictional effects on a hurricane as it nears landfall can, and do, have a magnifying effect on the winds. He's talking about this in the morning update about Charley going into NC.

My personal belief is that I would only stay if it was at minimal storm status or something like that.

Of course, I go to the bath tub at least when a Severe Thunderstorm approaches.
0 likes   

User avatar
opera ghost
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#17 Postby opera ghost » Sat Aug 14, 2004 3:54 pm

The thing about a place like this and the decision to ride out a storm is that most of us are pretty well informed. We all suspected/knew that Charley might intensify further.

While I'd say- I would ride out a Cat 2 storm... I don't think anyone HERE was thinking of Charley as a Cat 2 storm. I would ride out a storm with a maximum expected intensity of 2. I said well before landfall that it wouldn't surprise me if Charley made Cat5.

Now people who aren't that well informed need to be given this advice- but you're preachin' to the choir here. :)
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cajungal, Google Adsense [Bot], Teban54 and 172 guests