Republican's are lucky that..

Guest · #1 Postby **Guest** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 7:48 am

Bill Clinton can't run again!

lol.. Love or hate him, I'm sure 90% here hate him but the man is a master on the mic. Bet the house if he could run against W there wouldn't even be a race, it would be a laugher.

chadtm80 · #2 Postby **chadtm80** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:17 am

Dont think it would be a Laugher, I think many are tired of his dead butt.. However I will give you that the man is a GREAT speaker.. To bad the words coming out of his mouth are dead wrong.. A good speaker does not make a good leader

#3 Postby **vbhoutex** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:41 am

chadtm80 wrote:Dont think it would be a Laugher, I think many are tired of his dead butt.. However I will give you that the man is a GREAT speaker.. To bad the words coming out of his mouth are dead wrong.. A good speaker does not make a good leader

AMEN!!!!And he proved that quite well!!!

Josephine96 · #4 Postby **Josephine96** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:06 am

Clinton was a good president and a good speaker.. they went hand and hand..

Skywatch_NC · #5 Postby **Skywatch_NC** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:12 am

Bush is a good speaker and President, too...hand in hand.

Eric

j · #6 Postby j » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:23 am

We are ALL lucky he can't run again

#7 Postby **wx247** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:41 am

Skywatch_NC wrote:Bush is a good speaker and President, too...hand in hand.

Eric

I politely disagree about his speaking skills. Say what you want about how good of a president he is... the man can't speak very well.

Skywatch_NC · #8 Postby **Skywatch_NC** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:45 am

wx247 wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:Bush is a good speaker and President, too...hand in hand.

Eric

I politely disagree about his speaking skills. Say what you want about how good of a president he is... the man can't speak very well.

With all due respect...for ie: I didn't see Clinton go up there to say anything about Reagan at his funeral there in DC...Bush and his Dad both sounded good to me. To me Clinton looks like one of those "talking-head" types. GW is able to put emotion into his speaking.

Lindaloo · #9 Postby **Lindaloo** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:47 am

True Garrett, which means he is not a bunch of hot air. Unlike Clinton who is all talk no action.

Guest · #10 Postby **Guest** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:13 am

Skywatch_NC wrote:
wx247 wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:Bush is a good speaker and President, too...hand in hand.

Eric

I politely disagree about his speaking skills. Say what you want about how good of a president he is... the man can't speak very well.

With all due respect...for ie: I didn't see Clinton go up there to say anything about Reagan at his funeral there in DC...Bush and his Dad both sounded good to me. To me Clinton looks like one of those "talking-head" types. GW is able to put emotion into his speaking.

Umm that wasn't Clinton's decision bud. Bush has his good traits as well but don't even try putting him in the same league as Clinton with the gift to gab, this is actually one of Bush's shortcomings.

GalvestonDuck · #11 Postby **GalvestonDuck** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:23 am

To me, Clinton almost always sounded like he was giving some kind of high school book report. I never could stand to hear him give a speech.

I've worked with nurses who were highly skilled at their duties, but their interpersonal skills and bedside manner left something to be desired. Then there were those who were sweet as pie, but weren't really "trauma-minded" -- they generally stayed with the urgent care treatment side of the ER. Then there were those who were both well-skilled and extremely caring, which was a majority of the ER nurses. I only ever knew one who didn't have either as a strong trait -- and he ended up getting fired for drug theft anyway.

It's the same with politicians, I'm sure. Some are all talk (and good at it when they talk), but no action. Some are horrible public speakers, but they know how to get the job done. Every once in a while, there are those who can do it all. And once in a blue moon, there are those where we all look back and say, "What the heck were we thinking when we put him in office?"

Skywatch_NC · #12 Postby **Skywatch_NC** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:23 am

MdWx wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:
wx247 wrote:
Skywatch_NC wrote:Bush is a good speaker and President, too...hand in hand.

Eric

I politely disagree about his speaking skills. Say what you want about how good of a president he is... the man can't speak very well.

With all due respect...for ie: I didn't see Clinton go up there to say anything about Reagan at his funeral there in DC...Bush and his Dad both sounded good to me. To me Clinton looks like one of those "talking-head" types. GW is able to put emotion into his speaking.

Umm that wasn't Clinton's decision bud. Bush has his good traits as well but don't even try putting him in the same league as Clinton with the gift to gab, this is actually one of Bush's shortcomings.

Just a matter of opinion...I agree to disagree. :wink:

#13 Postby **CaptinCrunch** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:28 am

Need I say more, (http://www.jibjab.com) Bush is a mumbling idiot, when Bush speaks I can think of only one word "Hillbilly" or Boomhower on King of the Hill

Skywatch_NC · #14 Postby **Skywatch_NC** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:33 am

CaptinCrunch wrote:Need I say more, (http://www.jibjab.com) Bush is a mumbling idiot, when Bush speaks I can think of only one word "Hillbilly" or Boomhower on King of the Hill

Not his fault if he (Bush) hails from TX. :wink:

I can certainly understand him any day...than I would Boomhower.

Guest · #15 Postby **Guest** » Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:31 am

Clinton's speech was good but great.

Parts of it needed cohesion, and I thought he could have built up the end better.

It was also a bit too lighthearted at times and too self-aggrandizing

But overall a B/B+

Republican's are lucky that..

Republican's are lucky that..

Who is online