Short research on years w/ NO JUN or JUL TCs

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
ameriwx2003
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 980
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am

#21 Postby ameriwx2003 » Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:57 pm

There is a graph on this page showing the most active part of the season. As the Graph shows Spring training is about over and the real season is about to begin:):)

http://deved.meted.ucar.edu/hurrican/st ... asons1.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#22 Postby Trader Ron » Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:28 am

Vbhoutex wrote:

Is this just your own thoughts Rainstorm? If it isn't just something you think is logical and pulled out of your own brain, please back it up with a link to where you got it from or tell us who you are getting your information from. I believe USAWx1 made the point quite well that at a minimum we will have a slightly above average year. Personally everything I have seen and probably 90% of the different folks I correspond with, read, etc. are still saying an above normal activity year is in store. Like I stated elsewhere, we are all spoiled by the last few years that we remember and they were unusual years with early starts. They are not the norm-what we are seeing this year is the norm compared to them.[/quote]

Why is it when someone downplays the season,they get flamed?

I've seen someone say we will be "Inundated" in the next few weeks.This was posted over TWO weeks ago. I'm still waiting. What was his reason for saying we will be "Inundated" ?
Another person said. The "Lid" is about to come off. I'm still waiting.
It's funny these people "NEVER" get questioned for their logic. :)
0 likes   

Rainband

#23 Postby Rainband » Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:43 am

Excellent data USAwx1 :D
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29133
Age: 74
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#24 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:20 am

Trader Ron wrote:Vbhoutex wrote:

Is this just your own thoughts Rainstorm? If it isn't just something you think is logical and pulled out of your own brain, please back it up with a link to where you got it from or tell us who you are getting your information from. I believe USAWx1 made the point quite well that at a minimum we will have a slightly above average year. Personally everything I have seen and probably 90% of the different folks I correspond with, read, etc. are still saying an above normal activity year is in store. Like I stated elsewhere, we are all spoiled by the last few years that we remember and they were unusual years with early starts. They are not the norm-what we are seeing this year is the norm compared to them.


Why is it when someone downplays the season,they get flamed?

I've seen someone say we will be "Inundated" in the next few weeks.This was posted over TWO weeks ago. I'm still waiting. What was his reason for saying we will be "Inundated" ?
Another person said. The "Lid" is about to come off. I'm still waiting.
It's funny these people "NEVER" get questioned for their logic. :)[/quote]

I am presuming this is directed at me so I will respond.

1. I HAVE NEVER FLAMED ANYONE ON THIS BOARD OR ANY OTHER BOARD. I AM OFFENDED BY YOUR REMARK!! I asked her to back up her remarks with more than just an off the cuff remark. I do that with many here in case you haven't noticed.

2. I have multiple duties on this site that I do my best to keep up with besides living a "normal" life with my family and my full time job. I do not have time to read and respond to every post on this site, nor do I feel compelled to. If I did I would have much higher post count than I do.

If you have a problem with my posting you have two options. PM me about it and we can discuss it or PM either Chad or Marshall and they will deal with me as they see fit in the situation since they are the ultimate decision makers on this site. Do not make your complaints about me or my posting public!! I do not do that with others and I ask the same respect!!
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#25 Postby Trader Ron » Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:36 am

Well, Well...
It seems i touched a nerve. First of all, it wasn't directed at you in general. I was responding to some of the posters on here who flame people because they downplay a given season. I believe in balance, thats all.
One more thing. Someone forcasted we will have NINE named storms in August. It funny that person didn't give a reason. :)
It's the same way with Wall St. Most of the so-called experts are ALWAYS Bullish. Tell that to the people who have lost their shirt in 2001 and 2002.
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

Re: Short research on years w/ NO JUN or JUL TCs

#26 Postby donsutherland1 » Mon Jul 26, 2004 10:21 pm

Outstanding analysis, USAwx1. I believe this underscores why one should be patient.

At this time, it makes about as much sense to write off the hurricane season as it does to write off New York City's snowfall prospects if only a trace of snow fell in November and a trace or less in October (23/49 such years saw NYC wind up with 25" or more of snowfall; 15 such years saw NYC receive 30" or more).
0 likes   

rainstorm

#27 Postby rainstorm » Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:12 pm

well, if an el nino breaks out soon then the peak of the season wont be all that big. the east pac is on fire now, and i dont think that bodes well. 12% of the season is over, and if i am right, no african waves will develop for sometime. dry air, increasing shear from the east pac, dry monsoon, and a strong tutt. and, i am less convinced now that a ridge is coming to the east.
0 likes   

User avatar
USAwx1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 936
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Marineland, FL

#28 Postby USAwx1 » Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:59 pm

rainstorm wrote:well, if an el nino breaks out soon then the peak of the season wont be all that big. the east pac is on fire now, and i dont think that bodes well. 12% of the season is over, and if i am right, no african waves will develop for sometime. dry air, increasing shear from the east pac, dry monsoon, and a strong tutt. and, i am less convinced now that a ridge is coming to the east.


Actually that ridge is a positive IF looking for a landfall along the SE coast, SC, GA, FL.

Yes the WPAC is warming and El Nino is coming on, however the fact still remains that there is a Significant split in the SSTA over the region.

Image

2002 is very similar and that season had SIGNIFICANT activity, look at Isidore and Lili. If we take into consideration the ENSO as a whole The warm and cold pools SHOULD cancel each other out and yield pretty much neutral conditions through the remainder of the season.

And what was that you said "12% of the season is over". Ill remind you for my own health (since I'm a know-nothing idiot that is below you on the intelligence scale) that it is 12% of 100% and were only going on 2 months into a season which spans 6.
Last edited by USAwx1 on Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
USAwx1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 936
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Marineland, FL

#29 Postby USAwx1 » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:00 pm

21JUL2004 20.7 -.9 25.2 -.2 27.7 .7 29.4 .9
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#30 Postby senorpepr » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:24 pm

Thanks for sharing the great info. Great work as always.
0 likes   

User avatar
USAwx1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 936
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Marineland, FL

#31 Postby USAwx1 » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:25 pm

senorpepr wrote:Thanks for sharing the great info. Great work as always.


Thanks SP.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CFLHurricane, Team Ghost and 63 guests