Moderator: S2k Moderators
yoda wrote:I see... did we need to go way back to April though?
What about this, although Ashcroft denies it?
Still, some of the blame rested with Ashcroft, according to Pickard. A second staff report quoted Pickard as saying Ashcroft told him in the summer of 2001 that “he did not want to hear” additional information about possible attacks, an allegation he repeated in his public testimony Tuesday.
Wnghs2007 wrote:My god Yoda, Be quite before you embarress yourself. 8 Friggen Months In offic. Just 8!!!!!!!!!!!! Clinton Had 8 YEARS to Stop anything Like 9/11 but no His stupid staff and the liar himself did. NOTHING!!!!! He let Usama go free. Saudia Arabia had him for us in 1996 but no Clinton let him go. You make me laugh when you accuse Bush!:lol:
Lindaloo wrote:yoda wrote:I see... did we need to go way back to April though?
What about this, although Ashcroft denies it?
Still, some of the blame rested with Ashcroft, according to Pickard. A second staff report quoted Pickard as saying Ashcroft told him in the summer of 2001 that “he did not want to hear” additional information about possible attacks, an allegation he repeated in his public testimony Tuesday.
8 months of Ashcroft versus 8 years of Freeh and Janet Reno. Hmmmmm. I believe Ashcroft.
FWBHurricane wrote:IMO we caught Saddam..which is a big WMD to me. I want proof to know if this is false or not, i dont want it comming out of some radical democrate always trying to make things they arent. Clinton did squat during his terms...two terrorist attacks and doing nothing about it. Wouldnt it kinda click when you get another attack by the same terrorist. HELLO?! We should have gotten the bastards a long time ago...but clinton chose to sit in his oval office and have fun with Monica...Bush's rating on the handling of the War on Terror has skyrocketed...Kerry at a measly 35% and Bush at 50% for the month of July.
yoda wrote:
Excuse me, since when did Saudia Arabia have UBL in 1996? Please show me a source so I can believe you. Explain to me when Clinton had Usama in his sites... In addition, even top counter-terror officials said that even IF UBL had been killed, 9/11 would have still went on along with other terrorist threats. Saudia Arabia is like a double-edged sword to us KC. They foment terrorists and terrorism, while giving us oil while we (the US) look the other way! Also, could you at least spell correctly? I also find it interesting that Saddam posed more of a threat than UBL, and we were also able to find Saddam in like 6 months, and we have been searching for Usama for almost 3 years!! I believe that Bush went after Saddam after he couldn't find UBL.
AND MY GOD!!!!!!!! YOU GO THROUGH THOSE HELLACIOUS MOUNTAINS OF AFGHANISTAN AND THEN LETS SEE YOU TALKING ABOUT NOT FINDING ANY ONE!!!!! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4595429 wrote:These contacts with Sudan, which went on for years, have become a source of controversy. Former Sudanese officials claim that Sudan offered to expel Bin Ladin to the United States. Clinton administration officials deny ever receiving such an offer. We have not found any reliable evidence to support the Sudanese claim.
Wnghs2007 wrote:yoda wrote:
Excuse me, since when did Saudia Arabia have UBL in 1996? Please show me a source so I can believe you. Explain to me when Clinton had Usama in his sites... In addition, even top counter-terror officials said that even IF UBL had been killed, 9/11 would have still went on along with other terrorist threats. Saudia Arabia is like a double-edged sword to us KC. They foment terrorists and terrorism, while giving us oil while we (the US) look the other way! Also, could you at least spell correctly? I also find it interesting that Saddam posed more of a threat than UBL, and we were also able to find Saddam in like 6 months, and we have been searching for Usama for almost 3 years!! I believe that Bush went after Saddam after he couldn't find UBL.
LOL you get funnier and funnier by the moment. UBL was given to us by Sudan.Not Suadia, but still close enough.And we just let him go. THANKS MR. CLINTON!!!!!!!!http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4595429 wrote:These contacts with Sudan, which went on for years, have become a source of controversy. Former Sudanese officials claim that Sudan offered to expel Bin Ladin to the United States. Clinton administration officials deny ever receiving such an offer. We have not found any reliable evidence to support the Sudanese claim.
FWBHurricane wrote:Thats BS yoda and you know it! Bush's ratings on the handling of Iraq have gone up so much since we caught saddam and made a new government...he has done better than his father and better than kerry would have ever done...Kerry would have been like Clinton and shruged saying " Oh well.... " Bush leads in foreing policy as well..thats the two he leads in The Handling of the War and Foriegn Policys. Most of us can see right through kerry...him and his promises.
FWBHurricane wrote:There are many things Bush leads in..Moral Climate...War Handling...Foreign policy...Job ratings ( by about 2 points though but still in the lead ). And what.....confused on what BS stands for..i will be glad to spell it for you!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests
