Martha Stewart

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Do you think Martha Stewart got the punishment she deserved?

Yes
10
43%
No
13
57%
Not sure
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 23

Message
Author
User avatar
bfez1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6548
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:14 am
Location: Meraux--10 mi E of New Orleans-totally destroyed by Katrina
Contact:

Martha Stewart

#1 Postby bfez1 » Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:31 pm

I think it's a pretty fair sentence, after all she didn't kill anyone.
0 likes   

User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

#2 Postby TexasStooge » Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:35 pm

I think 5 months is enough to fix her little red wagon...or is it?

We'll just wait & see.
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter

VanceWxMan

#3 Postby VanceWxMan » Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:38 pm

money talks.. :roll: if that was a regular joe they would have given the full sentence.

Aaron
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38117
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#4 Postby Brent » Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:41 pm

NO! She should have gotten about a year, maybe a little more in a PRISON, not a Minimum security jail. :grr:
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#5 Postby yoda » Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:44 pm

Hmm.. well it was interesting to say the least... Martha SHOULD JUST SAY THANK YOU Judge and walk away.. but NO she has to appeal... getting 5 months instead of up to 40 (was it that high..?) is fine by me in my book.... but she should have gotten more..

:grr: :grr:
0 likes   

User avatar
JQ Public
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4488
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Cary, NC

#6 Postby JQ Public » Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:51 pm

I say no b/c i thought she deserved less. There are bigger fish to fry such as Kenneth Lay of Enron and the Tyco CEO. There are others. If they get anything less than what she does I think it'll be a real injustice. She's already lost her namesake from the company and all her shows and a couple homes...not to mention humiliation. How many of you wouldn't have done smthg if you knew your stock was going to go under?
Last edited by JQ Public on Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Guest

#7 Postby Guest » Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:51 pm

I think her sentence is fair. I'm just glad she didn't get off scott-free.
...Jennifer...
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#8 Postby GalvestonDuck » Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:56 pm

JQ Public wrote:I say no b/c i thought she deserved less. There are bigger fish to fry such as Kenneth Lay of Enron and the Tyco CEO. There are others. If they get anything less than what she does I think it'll be a real injustice. She's already lost her namesake from the company and all her shows and a couple homes...not to mention humiliation. How many of you wouldn't have done smthg if you knew your stock was going to go under?


I don't think Ken Lay knew what was going on with Andrew Fastow and Jeff Skilling. I honestly think (until I hear more proof than just guilt by association) he's not guilty of wrongdoing.
0 likes   

User avatar
JQ Public
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4488
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Cary, NC

#9 Postby JQ Public » Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:07 pm

Everything goes through the big wigs...nothing happens without their approval. Even if he dind't know he should have some input...especially on fudging documents etc. I still don't know what Enron does...they sure fooled me.

Martha's "wrongdoing" had nothing to do with her company...her company was doing honest business.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#10 Postby GalvestonDuck » Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:13 pm

True, but Ken Lay didn't go back to being CEO until August 2001 after dupe-head Skilling had to bow out.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29114
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#11 Postby vbhoutex » Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:38 pm

GalvestonDuck wrote:
JQ Public wrote:I say no b/c i thought she deserved less. There are bigger fish to fry such as Kenneth Lay of Enron and the Tyco CEO. There are others. If they get anything less than what she does I think it'll be a real injustice. She's already lost her namesake from the company and all her shows and a couple homes...not to mention humiliation. How many of you wouldn't have done smthg if you knew your stock was going to go under?


I don't think Ken Lay knew what was going on with Andrew Fastow and Jeff Skilling. I honestly think (until I hear more proof than just guilt by association) he's not guilty of wrongdoing.


If indeed you are right GD(and I can't disagree at this point)then he truly has to be one of the WORST CEO'S THIS PLANET HAS EVER SEEN!!! And come to think of it, with the assumption that he really did nothing wrong, he has indeed proven my allegation.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
Pburgh
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5403
Age: 80
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:36 am
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.

#12 Postby Pburgh » Fri Jul 16, 2004 7:53 pm

Well I wish you didn't have to serve any time at all!! Afterall, I pay for that prison time. I think they should hit this kind of crime where it hurts - in the pocketbook. I'm not talking about $250,000. I'm saying they should be fined millions and millions of dollars!!!!! For her crime I'd say $50,000 million would be good.
0 likes   

User avatar
streetsoldier
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 9705
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Under the rainbow

#13 Postby streetsoldier » Fri Jul 16, 2004 9:24 pm

Pburgh, that sounds like a VERY good idea...have the court divest Stewart of all of her holdings, her business, and all but one of her homes (she has 6 to choose from) in "real and punitive damages"; it would be interesting to see if she can "make it" as a normal, low-to-mid income citizen again.
0 likes   

User avatar
WEATHER53
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: College Park, MD

#14 Postby WEATHER53 » Fri Jul 16, 2004 9:42 pm

It reminds me a bit about Clarence Thomas' signature comment.
The amount of money she benefitted from amounts to about a person making $30,000 benefitting in the realm of $30-$50. Now, no arguement with if you break the law you break the law but it is most odd that all the resources that were musted happened to be against one of the, if not the, most successful business Women in America. The number of men of her business and social stature that have not benefitted from inside stock info is probably zero.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests