GULIANI VP, CHENEY CIA DIRECTOR? was i right?

chadtm80 · #41 Postby **chadtm80** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:06 pm

lol.. ok, ok.. J brilliant Idea!!! Has anyone heard anything else on fox or any other station about this?

#42 Postby **vbhoutex** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:27 pm

Brilliant???? As much as I like the scenario(and I would DEFINITELY vorte for that ticket), looking down the road, I do not think this country as a whole is ready for an all female Presidential race. I'm not saying there are not qualified women out there because there OBVIOUSLY are. I just don't think that this country will go that way. IF it does happen in 2008 it would be RICE IN A LANDSLIDE imo.

Wnghs2007 · #43 Postby **Wnghs2007** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:30 pm

vbhoutex wrote:Brilliant???? As much as I like the scenario(and I would DEFINITELY vorte for that ticket), looking down the road, I do not think this country as a whole is ready for an all female Presidential race. I'm not saying there are not qualified women out there because there OBVIOUSLY are. I just don't think that this country will go that way. IF it does happen in 2008 it would be RICE IN A LANDSLIDE imo.

I can see your point. We still need more time to get used to the idea of a female presidential race. And my feeling is that will take a long time happening. I mean 1 female canidate is enough but two might be a little out of hand for right now. :wink:

rainstorm · #44 Postby **rainstorm** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:38 pm

Wnghs2007 wrote:
vbhoutex wrote:Brilliant???? As much as I like the scenario(and I would DEFINITELY vorte for that ticket), looking down the road, I do not think this country as a whole is ready for an all female Presidential race. I'm not saying there are not qualified women out there because there OBVIOUSLY are. I just don't think that this country will go that way. IF it does happen in 2008 it would be RICE IN A LANDSLIDE imo.

I can see your point. We still need more time to get used to the idea of a female presidential race. And my feeling is that will take a long time happening. I mean 1 female canidate is enough but two might be a little out of hand for right now.

huh??????????? :grr:

chadtm80 · #45 Postby **chadtm80** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:42 pm

He didnt say two females.. He said One female and one Hillary Clinton.

j · #46 Postby j » Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:43 pm

Brilliant chad! lmao

Guest · #47 Postby **Guest** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:58 pm

Brilliant???? As much as I like the scenario(and I would DEFINITELY vorte for that ticket), looking down the road, I do not think this country as a whole is ready for an all female Presidential race. I'm not saying there are not qualified women out there because there OBVIOUSLY are. I just don't think that this country will go that way. IF it does happen in 2008 it would be RICE IN A LANDSLIDE imo.

David, I disagree. In some places gay marriage is legal now. That used to be an out there thought, like that would never happen. An all women ticket doesn't sound that far fetched of an idea to me.

I can see your point. We still need more time to get used to the idea of a female presidential race. And my feeling is that will take a long time happening. I mean 1 female canidate is enough but two might be a little out of hand for right now.

KC, that sounds borderline sexist.

But you know what, it's all good. A woman will win the Presidency in the coming years. Swallow your pride men, this is a woman's world too.

...Jennifer...

Wnghs2007 · #48 Postby **Wnghs2007** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:09 pm

chadtm80 wrote:He didnt say two females.. He said One female and one Hillary Clinton.

LOL CHAD. Yeah that is what I meant. that alien thing called Hillary Clinton doesnt count as the first woman canidate because she is not one. She is a billary clintonion. ROFLMAO :roflmao:

GalvestonDuck · #49 Postby **GalvestonDuck** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:26 pm

Just curious (not that it'd happen) but knowing that not all people of my particular sexual/affectual preference share the same political views AND knowing my views on abortion, terrorism, and so forth from what you've read in my posts, who would you vote for -- me (or not necessarily me, but someone who was gay and had those views) or Hillary?

And yes, I know, she has experience on her side. I'm just speaking hypothetically. Would you vote for a gay candidate if he/she shared the same views as you on all other issues?

Guest · #50 Postby **Guest** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:33 pm

GalvestonDuck wrote:Just curious (not that it'd happen) but knowing that not all people of my particular sexual/affectual preference share the same political views AND knowing my views on abortion, terrorism, and so forth from what you've read in my posts, who would you vote for -- me (or not necessarily me, but someone who was gay and had those views) or Hillary?

And yes, I know, she has experience on her side. I'm just speaking hypothetically. Would you vote for a gay candidate if he/she shared the same views as you on all other issues?

yes.

j · #51 Postby j » Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:40 pm

GalvestonDuck wrote:Just curious (not that it'd happen) but knowing that not all people of my particular sexual/affectual preference share the same political views AND knowing my views on abortion, terrorism, and so forth from what you've read in my posts, who would you vote for -- me (or not necessarily me, but someone who was gay and had those views) or Hillary?

And yes, I know, she has experience on her side. I'm just speaking hypothetically. Would you vote for a gay candidate if he/she shared the same views as you on all other issues?

hmmm...tricky question....but I respect you for asking the way you did. Once again, you have shown the diplomatic way to present your case.

My answer is yes (vs Hillary that is)

chadtm80 · #52 Postby **chadtm80** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:44 pm

hmmm.. Tricky question in deed.. IF we held all the same views. Then yes..

GalvestonDuck · #53 Postby **GalvestonDuck** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 3:57 pm

Okay, maybe not all the same views.

But a candidate with all the same views as you personally (except maybe for gay rights issues, and even I don't hold the same views as most gays) VS. a democrat.

LOL! Yeah, J, of course, vs. Hillary, just about anyone could win.

#54 Postby **USAwx1** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 4:09 pm

chadtm80 wrote:He didnt say two females.. He said One female and one Hillary Clinton.

You know, its funny you bring that up seeing as how Hillary Clinton acts more like a MAN than some of the MALE politicians.

#55 Postby **vbhoutex** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 4:14 pm

Most definitely Duckie!!! And I wouldn't say that against just Hillary. The right person for the job IMO is the one I vote for, gay, straignt, green, black, etc. I may be a registered Republican, but I vote for the person who can fill the job best IMO.

GalvestonDuck · #56 Postby **GalvestonDuck** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 4:15 pm

USAwx1 wrote:
chadtm80 wrote:He didnt say two females.. He said One female and one Hillary Clinton.

You know, its funny you bring that up seeing as how Hillary Clinton acts more like a MAN than some of the MALE politicians.

She scares me in that regard! :eek:

chadtm80 · #57 Postby **chadtm80** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 5:01 pm

LOL, Duckie!!

#58 Postby **Stephanie** » Wed Jun 09, 2004 7:44 pm

Yes Duck. As David said, male, female, black, white, straight or gay - if you are qualified for the job and I agree with your positions, then I would vote for you!

GULIANI VP, CHENEY CIA DIRECTOR? was i right?

Who is online