Breaking News - 4:20 CST

Guest · #1 Postby **Guest** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:20 pm

Pentagon is putting a halt to SHOCK AND AWE campaign. Don't know the reason - there also seems to be some confusion to if Iraqi is under any leadership right now.

This is from CNN - at home watching TV now.

Patricia

chadtm80 · #2 Postby **chadtm80** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:23 pm

Hmmmm who knows.. Could mean many things... (even maybe sadams death)

nystate · #3 Postby **nystate** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:27 pm

ticka1 wrote:Pentagon is putting a halt to SHOCK AND AWE campaign. Don't know the reason - there also seems to be some confusion to if Iraqi is under any leadership right now.

This is from CNN - at home watching TV now.

Patricia

According to Fox News and MSNBC the "Shock and Awe" campaign has not even started yet. Pentagon says you wont be able to miss it!

chadtm80 · #4 Postby **chadtm80** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:29 pm

Ya.. i saw that to nystate..... But earlier they did say it had started.... Were going to get mixed reports all through this

rainstorm · #5 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:30 pm

it could be saddam has accepted exhile and we will not occupy iraq, leading to total chaos. a victory for saddam? i hope i am wrong. is this another half-measure?

#6 Postby **bfez1** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:30 pm

What????
What the heck is going on???? Is Saddam dead?????
ticka, keep us posted

rainstorm · #7 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:32 pm

defeat for us?

chadtm80 · #8 Postby **chadtm80** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:34 pm

No rainstorm...

rainstorm · #9 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:41 pm

chadtm80 wrote:No rainstorm...

his sons for safe passage. my biggest fear is that saddam will go into comfy exhile, the un will step in and tell us to stop, and we will be left with a mess. bush has total victory in his hands. we can be in baghdad in 2 days. dont do waht bush sr did in 91

#10 Postby **wx247** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:42 pm

The very latest as I have it... The shock and awe campaign has been delayed because we are in negotiations with members of the Iraqi Army, Republican Guard, and Sr. Republican Guard about surrendering. This has nothing to do with Saddam, who most officials believe is still alive and is not leaving.

Derek Ortt · #11 Postby **Derek Ortt** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:43 pm

This is not negotiating time, this is unconditional surrender time

#12 Postby **BreinLa** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:44 pm

Sadamm won't go anywhere

#13 Postby **wx247** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:45 pm

You do what you have to in order to save innocent Iraqi lives!

rainstorm · #14 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:47 pm

wx247 wrote:The very latest as I have it... The shock and awe campaign has been delayed because we are in negotiations with members of the Iraqi Army, Republican Guard, and Sr. Republican Guard about surrendering. This has nothing to do with Saddam, who most officials believe is still alive and is not leaving.

but we need to be in baghdad, not the un. if the un is in charge saddam will be able to influence any new govt. get moving bush!!

Guest · #15 Postby **Guest** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:48 pm

Yes Wx that is the latest I have heard too. It seems some high ranking members of the REPULICAN GUARD are wanting to surrounder.

When and if I hear anymore I will post it. Sadamn is said to be alive and supposely the media is reporting that is him on the tape last night - but we don't know how old that tape was....seems like it was edited - someone said there a freeze frame during it.

#16 Postby **wx247** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 5:51 pm

rainstorm wrote:
wx247 wrote:The very latest as I have it... The shock and awe campaign has been delayed because we are in negotiations with members of the Iraqi Army, Republican Guard, and Sr. Republican Guard about surrendering. This has nothing to do with Saddam, who most officials believe is still alive and is not leaving.

but we need to be in baghdad, not the un. if the un is in charge saddam will be able to influence any new govt. get moving bush!!

What are talking about when you mention the UN? I am speaking of negotiations between the US forces and the Iraqi forces.

--Garrett

Derek Ortt · #17 Postby **Derek Ortt** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 6:00 pm

You accept nothing less than unconditional surrender unless you are losing. Other factors are secondary. Civilians die in war, that is a sad reality

#18 Postby **wx247** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 6:02 pm

I am not going to argue... I have faith in my country and that they are doing the right thing. :roll:

chadtm80 · #19 Postby **chadtm80** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 6:03 pm

Agree wx247... The goverment knows what it is doing... A lot more than we do

nystate · #20 Postby **nystate** » Thu Mar 20, 2003 6:06 pm

Fox News just said that shock and awe will go on. :?

Breaking News - 4:20 CST

Breaking News - 4:20 CST

Re: Breaking News - 4:20 CST

the un may have put a stop to the war

maybe, but it is possible we are negotiating with saddam and

negotiating is fine

Re: negotiating is fine

Who is online