Cheney and Bush

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Do you believe President Bush and Vice President Cheney should answer questions from the 9/11 commission in public?

Yes
9
47%
No
6
32%
Not Sure
4
21%
 
Total votes: 19

Message
Author
User avatar
bfez1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6548
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:14 am
Location: Meraux--10 mi E of New Orleans-totally destroyed by Katrina
Contact:

Cheney and Bush

#1 Postby bfez1 » Thu Apr 29, 2004 11:30 am

I vote Yes!

Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:

Bush 'glad' he took the time to answer 9/11 commission's questions, says it was a an 'important' meeting.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#2 Postby Lindaloo » Thu Apr 29, 2004 12:01 pm

I voted yes. He has nothing to hide. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#3 Postby mf_dolphin » Thu Apr 29, 2004 12:05 pm

I voted No. I believe that the seperation of powers is an important concept in our form of government. The public hearings have just become a forum for public preening. President Bush and VP Cheney met with the committee and that's good enough for me. :-)
0 likes   

Guest

#4 Postby Guest » Thu Apr 29, 2004 12:09 pm

He should answer as many questions as he can, but I support his right to invoke executive privilege when the nation's security may be at risk, at his own discretion.
...Jennifer...
0 likes   

User avatar
streetsoldier
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 9705
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Under the rainbow

#5 Postby streetsoldier » Thu Apr 29, 2004 12:36 pm

I voted a resounding NO. To require such disclosure, especially when we are at war, is idiotic...and potentially dangerous to our security.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29113
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#6 Postby vbhoutex » Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:23 pm

I read the question and voted wrong!!! I did not see the word public when i read it! :roll: :oops: I officially change my vote to NO!!!!!! fo Marshall's reason.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

Rainband

#7 Postby Rainband » Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:40 pm

streetsoldier wrote:I voted a resounding NO. To require such disclosure, especially when we are at war, is idiotic...and potentially dangerous to our security.
This is all pretty much public anyway. I say yes :wink:
0 likes   

Rainband

#8 Postby Rainband » Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:41 pm

mf_dolphin wrote:I voted No. I believe that the seperation of powers is an important concept in our form of government. The public hearings have just become a forum for public preening. President Bush and VP Cheney met with the committee and that's good enough for me. :-)
I vote yes. :P Government for the people by the people. If anything is a national security issue ..they can skip that!!! I wanna hear what they have to say!! :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
JQ Public
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4488
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Cary, NC

#9 Postby JQ Public » Fri Apr 30, 2004 10:24 pm

I voted yes. I mean there is no secret that we're at war on terrorism, and if they knew smthg back then i am sure they have already done smthg about it. If not then they have no excuses...its been three years almost. So, yes they should answer questions.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests